Legal opportunity structure: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m [458]Combined duplicate references. | User-activated. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* |
* |
||
* |
* |
||
<!-- Just press the "Save page" button below without changing anything! Doing so will submit your article submission for review. Once you have saved this page you will find a new yellow 'Review waiting' box at the bottom of your submission page. If you have submitted your page previously, the old pink 'Submission declined' template or the old grey 'Draft' template will still appear at the top of your submission page, but you should ignore them. Again, please don't change anything in this text box. Just press the "Save page" button below. --> |
|||
{{AFC submission|||ts=20131021125827|u=Legmob1|ns=5}} |
|||
Revision as of 12:58, 21 October 2013
 | This article, Legal opportunity structure, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |
Legal opportunity structure or legal opportunity is a concept found in the study of law and social movements. It was first used in order to distinguish it from political opportunity structure or political opportunity, on the basis that law and the courts deserved to be studied in their own right rather than being lumped together with political institutions.[1] Legal opportunities are made up of: access to the courts, which may be affected in particular by the law on standing or locus standi, and costs rules; 'legal stock' or the set of available precedents on which to hang a case;[2] and judicial receptiveness. Some of these are more obviously structural than others - hence the term legal opportunity is sometimes preferred over legal opportunity structure.
Legal opportunity has been used as an independent variable to help to explain strategy choice by social movement organisations (SMOs) - e.g. why SMOS adopt litigation rather than protest or political lobbying as a strategy. Other variables or explanatory frameworks it is commonly found alongside include framing,[3] and resource mobilization. It can also be employed as a dependent variable.[4]
Legal opportunity theory has been applied to a wide range of policy areas which have seen legal mobilization by social movements, including the environmental,[1][5] animal rights,[1] women's,[1] LGBT,[1][2][6] labor,[6] civil rights,[7] and disability movements.[3]
References
- ^ a b c d e Hilson, Chris (2002) 'New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity' 9(2) Journal of European Public Policy 238-255.
- ^ a b Andersen, Ellen Ann (2005) Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
- ^ a b Vanhala, Lisa (2011) Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Evans Case, Rhonda and Givens, Terri E (2010) 'Re-engineering Legal Opportunity Structures in the European Union? The Starting Line Group and the Politics of the Racial Equality Directive' 48(2) JCMS 221-241.
- ^ Vanhala, Lisa (2012) 'Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK' 46(3) Law & Society Review 523–556
- ^ a b Wilson, Bruce M, and Cordero, Juan Carlos Rodríguez (2006) 'Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics' 39(3) Comparative Political Studies 325-351.
- ^ De Fazio, Gianluca (2012) 'Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States' 53(1) International Journal of Comparative Sociology 3-22.
| This article, Legal opportunity structure, has recently been created via the Articles for creation process. Please check to see if the reviewer has accidentally left this template after accepting the draft and take appropriate action as necessary.
Reviewer tools: Inform author |