Viennese Actionism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:10, 22 October 2013

Viennese Actionism was a short and violent movement in 20th-century art. It can be regarded as part of the many independent efforts of the 1960s to develop "action art" (Fluxus, Happening, Performance, Body Art, etc.). Its main participants were Günter Brus, Otto Mühl, Hermann Nitsch and Rudolf Schwarzkogler. As "actionists", they were active between 1960 and 1971. Most have continued their artistic work independently from the early 1970s onwards.

Documentation of the work of these four artists suggests that there was no consciously developed sense of a movement or any cultivation of membership status in an "actionist" group. Rather, this name was one applied to various collaborative configurations among these four artists. Malcolm Green has quoted Hermann Nitsch's comment, "Vienna Actionism never was a group. A number of artists reacted to particular situations that they all encountered, within a particular time period, and with similar means and results."^[1]

Art and the Politics of Transgression

The work of the Actionists developed concurrently with—but largely independently from—other avant garde movements of the era that shared an interest in rejecting object-based or otherwise commodifiable art practices. The practice of staging precisely scored "Actions" in controlled environments or before audiences bears similarities to the Fluxus concept of enacting an "event score" and is a forerunner to Performance Art.

The work of the Viennese Actionists is probably best remembered for the wilful transgressiveness of its naked bodies, destructiveness and violence. Often, brief jail terms were served by participants for violations of decency laws, and their works were targets of moral outrage. In June 1968 Günter Brus began serving a six-month prison sentence for the crime of "degrading symbols of the state", and later fled Austria to avoid a second arrest. Otto Mühl served a one-month prison term after his participation in a public event, "Art and Revolution" in 1968. After his "Piss Action" before a Munich audience, Mühl became a fugitive from the West German police. Hermann Nitsch served a two-week prison term in 1965 after his participation with Rudolph Schwarzkogler in the Festival of Psycho-Physical Naturalism. The "Destruction in Art Symposium", held in London in 1966, marked the first encounter between members of Fluxus and Actionists. It was a landmark of international recognition for the work of Brus, Mühl and Nitsch.

While the nature and content of each artist's work differed, there are distinct aesthetic and thematic threads connecting the Actions of Brus, Mühl, Nitsch, and Schwarzkogler. Use of the body as both surface and site of art-making seems to have been a common point of origin for the Actionists in their earliest departures from conventional art practices in the late 50s and early 60s. Brus' "Hand Painting Head Painting" action of 1964, Mühl and Nitsch's "Degradation of a Female Body, Degradation of A Venus" of 1963 are characterized by their efforts to reconceive human bodies as surfaces for the production of art. The trajectories of the Actionists' work suggests more than just a precedent to later performance art and body art, rather, a drive toward a totalizing art-practice is inherent in their refusing to be confined within conventional ideas of painting, theatre and sculpture. Mühl's 1964 "Material Action Manifesto" offers some theoretical framework for understanding this:

...material action is painting that has spread beyond the picture surface. The human body, a laid table or a room becomes the picture surface. Time is added to the dimension of the body and space.^[2]

A 1967 revision of the same manifesto Mühl wrote:

... material action promises the direct pleasures of the table. Material action satiates. Far more important than baking bread is the urge to take dough-beating to the extreme.^[2]

Brus and Mühl participated in the "Kunst und Revolution" (Art and Revolution) event in Vienna, June 1968, issuing the following proclamation:

... our assimilatory democracy maintains art as a safety valve for enemies of the state ... the consumer state drives a wave of "art" before itself; it attempts to bribe the "artist" and thus to rehabilitate his revolutionising "art" as an art that supports the state. But "art" is not art. "Art" is politics that has created new styles of communication.^[2]

Actionists and Experimental Film in Vienna

Much of the existing moving-image documentation of Viennese Actionist work survives because of strong ties between the Actionists and art/experimental filmmaking of the 1960s. The Austrian filmmaker Kurt Kren participated in the documentation of Actions as early as 1964, producing a body of Actionist related works that stand as historic avant-garde films in their own right for their use of rapid editing. As well, Otto Muehl produced a significant body of Actionist related film work that has been celebrated in Amos Vogel's Film as a Subversive Art. Films of and related to Actionist performance remain available through the Vienna based Sixpack film distributor and the U.S. distribution cooperatives Canyon Cinema and The Film-makers' Coop. In 2005 the Actionist films of Kurt Kren were issued on video by the Austrian publisher INDEX DVD.

Feminist Actionism and Video Art

Amongst artists like Otto Muehl, Kurt Kren, Hermann Nitsch, and Otmar Bauer, female artist, Valie Export, experimented with video art through the frame of Actionim. In response to the primary of the male body, Export created her own version of Actionism: Feminist Actionism. In her manifesto, Export surveys a history of female artists within Surrealism, Kinetics, Tachism, Happenings, Art Informel and other contemporary movements, she finds the traces of feminine objectification within a phallocentric world. She declares: “Feminist Actionism shall free men's products, that is, women, from their thing-character. Just as action aims at achieving the unity of actor and material, perception and action, subject and object, Feminist Actionism seeks to transform the object of male natural history, the material "woman," subjugated and enslaved by the male creator, into an independent actor and creator, subject of her own history.” As opposed to Viennese Actionism, which used materiality and the object to overcome subject-hood, Export’s Feminist Actionism removed women from their object status by ‘enacting,’ to gain subject-hood through ‘doing.’ She enables herself by mutilating her body and placing it in asexual and violently unfamiliar contexts.

In her video and film work is concerned with the fragmentation of femininity. In opposition to Muehl and Kren’s rapid montage-like films exhibiting shocking, violent and sexual images of the human body, Export’s videos are slower, focusing on the violence tearing within the female body. In her video Mann & Frau & Animal (1970-73), a nude female body lays in a bathtub. The camera slowly surveys the metallic knobs and snaking hoses of the tube, the water trickles on, and finally Export begins to masturbate with the shower hose. The performance is simple, mundane, and strangely pure. As the orgasmic peak is approaching the female moans become animal shrieks or the grunts of a possible male spectator and the vagina is overtaken by blackness, slime, and blood. The finale is the photograph of a vagina and the image of a bloodly hand dripping onto the photo. The unadorned body is transformed into an image of a savage beast. Export explicitly comments of the cultural civilizing of female sexuality and, consequently, the construction of female representation.

In another video, Remote... Remote (1973), Export sits before an image of two children with a bowl of milk nestled between her legs. She begins to peel or scrape her fingertips with a knife as if they were potatoes, obsessively carving her cuticles. She continues to dip her bloodly fingers into the bowl of milk, polluting its pure whiteness. As Andrew Grossman says, “What is "remote" in the film's title becomes the penis, mystified by a century of Freudianism and now revealed as a ragged sham. Our social strivings are not Freudian sublimations of phallic frustration — rather, the weeping phallus is an inferior sublimation of the technological, gender-superseding finger. This, truly, is EXPORT's feminism, suggesting that beneath the beautiful, adaptable, versatile finger is a degraded, savage totem better left to the ancients.” ^[3] Export’s work deviates from Muehl or Kren-- she sees the body, not as an extension of the canvas, but as something that must “resist masochistic devolutions into bloodly phallic tragedy.”

As her work progresses, she is in direct dialogue with the medium and structure of video and television. In her video Syntagma (1983) she illustrates the tearing, fracturing, and divided self of the female body through video monitors, mirrors, split-screens, and superimpositions. In the opening sequence, a pair of female hands struggle to push apart two strips of celluloid film to emerge in the center. In her made-for- TV video, A Perfect Pair (1987), she uses with graphic media, TV narrative and advertisement to illustrate a dystopian future where people are stamped with products and logos. Her characters are tattooed, or programed with digital holograms of their sponsors. Export uses video technology and it’s cultural narratives depicted on film or TV to explore the status of the female body in representation and identity formation. Export has a much stronger focus on film narrative then her male counterparts, parodying it to expose how they support the structure of the state that constructs correct femininity and correct “art” (as referenced by Malcolm Green above). Export experiments with politics of resistance through more subtle satire, deviating from the serious and jarring nature of Viennese Actionism.

Notes

^ Brus Mühl Nitsch Schwarzkogler. Writings of the Viennese Actionsts London, Atlas Press, 1999. Malcolm Green, ed.
^ ^a ^b ^c Malcolm Green
^ [1]

External links

Ubuweb: The Vienna Actionists Contains video files of Action films by Kurt Kren, Otto Mühl and others. Also contains the complete text of a 2002 interview with Otto Mühl.
"archives muehl" Official Otto Muehl website
Orgies Mysteries Theatre Official Hermann Nitsch website
Hermann Nitsch’ ‘Orgien Mysterien Theater’ – The artist as a high priest? About the relation between art, religion, ritual and reality.
Bright Lights Film Journal Andrew Grossman, 2002 interview with Otto Mühl as it was originally published.
Sixpack Film, Vienna - English language site Austrian based film distributor, catalogue includes works of Kurt Kren and Gunter Brus.
Index DVD - English language site Distributor of Kurt Kren's Action films on video.
The Film-Makers' Cooperative New York City based distributor of films by Otto Mühl and Kurt Kren.
Canyon Cinema San Francisco based distributor of films by Kurt Kren.
Writings of the Vienna Actionists Atlas Press publication edited by Malcolm Green, still available.
Actionism in Arteseleccion
Thomas Dreher: Action Theater as Provocation: Grotesque Body Conception in Vienna Actionism/Aktionstheater als Provokation: groteske Körperkonzeption im Wiener Aktionismus (in German)
'Breaking Out of the Reality-Asylum: Hermann NItsch and the Orgies Mysteries Theatre', 1998. Essay by Paul Sakoilsky on Nitsch/Actionism and 'the 6-day play'. (2002 re-edit) published, Galerie Zimmerman Krotochwill Catalogue 08/2010

[1] Brus Mühl Nitsch Schwarzkogler. Writings of the Viennese Actionsts London, Atlas Press, 1999. Malcolm Green, ed.

[Malcolm_Green-2] Malcolm Green

[3] [1]

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Art and the Politics of Transgression==
-The work of the Actionists developed concurrently with—but largely independently from—other ''avant garde'' movements of the era who shared an interest in rejecting object-based or otherwise [[commodity|commodifiable]] art practices. The practice of staging precisely scored "Actions" in controlled environments or before audiences bears similarities to the Fluxus concept of enacting an "event score" and is a forerunner to [[Performance Art]].
+The work of the Actionists developed concurrently with—but largely independently from—other avant garde movements of the era that shared an interest in rejecting object-based or otherwise [[commodity|commodifiable]] art practices. The practice of staging precisely scored "Actions" in controlled environments or before audiences bears similarities to the Fluxus concept of enacting an "event score" and is a forerunner to [[Performance Art]].
 The work of the Viennese Actionists is probably best remembered for the wilful transgressiveness of its naked bodies, destructiveness and violence. Often, brief jail terms were served by participants for violations of decency laws, and their works were targets of moral outrage. In June 1968 Günter Brus began serving a six-month prison sentence for the crime of "degrading symbols of the state", and later fled Austria to avoid a second arrest. [[Otto Mühl]] served a one-month prison term after his participation in a public event, "Art and Revolution" in 1968. After his "Piss Action" before a [[Munich]] audience, Mühl became a fugitive from the West German police. Hermann Nitsch served a two-week prison term in 1965 after his participation with Rudolph Schwarzkogler in the Festival of Psycho-Physical Naturalism. The "Destruction in Art Symposium", held in London in 1966, marked the first encounter between members of Fluxus and Actionists. It was a landmark of international recognition for the work of Brus, Mühl and Nitsch.