Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3MB (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:05, 22 October 2013

3MB

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same concern as past two deletion nominations: Sources in article add nothing in terms of notability to the previously-deleted one. Fails WP:GNG — Richard BB 14:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in the previous AfD it seemed that people knew this passed the GNG but nobody cared enough to get sources. Here's some:[1][2][3][4]. Should be enough to cover all concerns.LM2000 (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep they fit everything for an individual tag team page. They have a theme and have promos for them. After a year they might be floundering but they are established. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG KEEP (edited): They haven't had an article until now. Even though they lose a lot, this page is worth keeping. They are still an established tag team. D-Generation X and The Brothers of Destruction may have been way more notable, but this article is still worth keeping. 76.220.66.126 (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They aren't really notable, the page is poorly sourced barely sourced as it is. They're are barley a team. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 03:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Keep''' in the previous AfD it seemed that people knew this passed the GNG but nobody cared enough to get sources.  Here's some:[http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/bios/t/three-man-band/][http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/bios/t/three-man-band/][http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/news/299799/WWE-Teasing-Drew-McIntyre-Separating-from-3MB.htm][http://www.wrestleview.com/wwe-news/37588-3mb-members-appearing-at-nxt-house-show-on-11-30].  Should be enough to cover all concerns.[[User:LM2000|LM2000]] ([[User talk:LM2000|talk]]) 21:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' they fit everything for an individual tag team page. They have a theme and have promos for them. After a year they might be floundering but they are established. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 16:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
-*'''KEEP''': They haven't had an article until now. Even though they lose a lot, this page is worth keeping. They are still an established tag team. [[D-Generation X]] and [[The Brothers of Destruction]] may have been way more notable, but this article is still worth keeping. [[Special:Contributions/76.220.66.126|76.220.66.126]] ([[User talk:76.220.66.126|talk]]) 03:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
+*'''STRONG KEEP (edited)''': They haven't had an article until now. Even though they lose a lot, this page is worth keeping. They are still an established tag team. [[D-Generation X]] and [[The Brothers of Destruction]] may have been way more notable, but this article is still worth keeping. [[Special:Contributions/76.220.66.126|76.220.66.126]] ([[User talk:76.220.66.126|talk]]) 03:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' They aren't really notable, the page is poorly sourced barely sourced as it is. They're are barley a team. --[[User:Miss X-Factor|Miss X-Factor]] ([[User talk:Miss X-Factor|talk]]) 03:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 <hr style="width:55%;" />