Jump to content

Talk:HMAS Kuttabul (naval base): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
assess towards B class
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


{{todo|priority=5}}
{{todo|priority=5}}

== Photograph ==
[[User:Adam.J.W.C.|***Adam***]] revertion to bad photography in article [[User:Hpeterswald|Hpeterswald]] ([[User talk:Hpeterswald|talk]]) 19:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:05, 28 October 2013

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / South Pacific Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
WikiProject iconAustralia: Sydney / Military history Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconHMAS Kuttabul (naval base) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Photograph

***Adam*** revertion to bad photography in article Hpeterswald (talk) 19:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]