Jump to content

Talk:Haneda Airport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mongolia service: new section
Line 98: Line 98:


As far as I can tell, the charter flights between HND and Mongolia were for very limited periods and were not conducted in 2013, so I have removed these from the airlines and destinations list. [[User:Sekicho|Sekicho]] ([[User talk:Sekicho|talk]]) 04:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the charter flights between HND and Mongolia were for very limited periods and were not conducted in 2013, so I have removed these from the airlines and destinations list. [[User:Sekicho|Sekicho]] ([[User talk:Sekicho|talk]]) 04:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

== United, Virgin Atlantic, and Air France future services ==

Please read [[WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT]], all new services must have a exact date (Day, Month, Year) in order to qualify for listing. Please take this up at the project talk page if anyone have any objections. [[Special:Contributions/68.119.73.36|68.119.73.36]] ([[User talk:68.119.73.36|talk]]) 21:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:58, 28 October 2013

Former good article nomineeHaneda Airport was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
WikiProject iconAviation: Airports B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airport project.
WikiProject iconJapan: Infrastructure / Tokyo C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:00, January 11, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Infrastructure task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Tokyo task force.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Passenger Figures

The 62.8 million passenger figures comes from ACI's 2003 traffic report at the URL below, which Wikimedia refuses to format as a link because of the (technically illegal) caret: Jpatokal 16:44, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

GA Review

While there are two in-text citations related to specific assertions, the article as a whole is largely unreferenced and therefore does not meet the GA criteria. Otherwise, I think it's quite well done and, once the referencing is done, it should be re-submitted. - Mocko13 03:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I'd be interested to know the role of this airport during WW2 -- the gap between 1930 and the postwar era needs to be filled.

IvyGold (talk) 04:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flights to Honolulu

Sorry, but [1] is speculation dated from April, not fact. I can't find any HND-HNL flights on the HNL website [2] nor on JAL's site. Jpatokal 13:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using Debito.org as a source for ID checks

Regarding [3]

I removed the statement because I am unsure if we should use debito.org to source that. Why not remove the statement now and then add it back if you find a Japan Times article which states this? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Past Routes in the International section

Past / historical services are not notable per project guidenines, and have been removed from all other airport articles. I plan to remove these from here as well. Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 11:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. I did not create a dab page, so if anyone feels that is needed instead of a hat note, fell free to do so. I have cleaned up the incoming links, but the article introduction also needs to be reworked. Vegaswikian (talk) 16:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Tokyo International AirportHaneda Airport — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unclear which airport this refers to as virtually all international flights to Tokyo go to Narita Airport. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@ Jpatokal do you have a source for the international flights returning to Haneda? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Start here ;) Tokyo International Airport#Future international development Jpatokal (talk) 08:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The same guideline (which is tagged as a draft, FWIW) also says "Try to use a name that is sourced from a government agency, or the airport operator", which in this case is Tokyo Int'l. Jpatokal (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably you mean a site such as the official airport website, which uses "Haneda Airport" in large letters above "Tokyo International Airport" on the top page, and uses "Haneda Airport" in the text within the site (such as here). --DAJF (talk) 10:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Of note the airport code is also HND which clearly refers to Haneda rather than Tokyo International. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 01:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I await your move requests to shift Soekarno–Hatta International Airport to Cengkareng (CGK) and O'Hare International Airport to Orchard Place Airport (ORD). Jpatokal (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not all airport codes are sensible, some like CGK are based on a non-English word or like PEK or SGN are based on the old spelling. This one is sensible. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Say what? CGK is named after a place called Cengkareng, and HND is named after a place called Haneda. Both are equally non-English... and equally "sensible". Jpatokal (talk) 08:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious to know how you arrived at those figures, as I get 72,200 Google hits for "Tokyo International Airport" (note the quotes) and 169,000 for "Haneda Airport". --DAJF (talk) 05:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You get 2 million Google hits if you search for Tokyo International Airport without quotes. The fact that that searches top hit is for Narita airport kinda proves my point. And given that there is a mix of hits for Haneda and Narita further down means that this term is confusing. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 07:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very well then (except for that Narita airport thing, which is totally irrelevant), but if you have never heard of either term, "Tokyo International Airport" is easier to recognize immediately. Tokyo International Airport means that "it is the main airport in Tokyo and it is international". Haneda Airport means "um... well... it's an airport and... its Japanese". So in this case, I think it is more important that WP:ENGLISH be applied here. --WikiDonn (talk) 18:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Narita is the main airport in Tokyo for international flights. Haneda airport is mostly used for internal flights. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WikiDonn, the point is that "Haneda Airport" is the name used widely used in the English language media precisely because calling it "Tokyo International Airport" results in people like yourself mistakenly assuming that it is the main international airport for Tokyo - which it isn't. Narita Airport isn't irrelevant at all, as searching for "Tokyo International Airport" without the quotes will trawl up a large number of pages related to Narita Airport instead of Haneda. --DAJF (talk) 22:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I want to ask a question: We explain in the first paragraph the various names for this airport. Is there any problems solved by renaming this article that are not served by the simple redirect from Haneda Airport? —fudoreaper (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well it would reduce the need for piping in links to this article, as an awful lot of the links from many articles are currently in the form [[Tokyo International Airport|Haneda Airport]] precisely because the name "Tokyo International Airport" is not that widely used or recognized in English (as demonstrated by WikiDonn's confusion above). --DAJF (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@ Fudoreaper, we can then turn this into a disambiguation page which points at both Narita and this airport as its confusing. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 07:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good idea to me. --WikiDonn (talk) 18:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This discussion demonstrates why the change makes sense. Not sure that a disambiguation page is needed though, a hatnote on each article should be sufficient. Skinsmoke (talk) 19:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most international airports in Wikipedia include the name of the city in the article title, even though commonly for instance London's main airport would be referred to as simply Heathrow Airport. In this case the official website uses the title Haneda Airport (Tokyo International Airport), which would seem to suggest that is the official title. There are instances of Tokyo Haneda Airport being used in general websites, [4], [5], [6]. Cjc13 (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Geography Lessons

The introduction uses parenthetical indications that the Seoul being referenced in the opening paragraph is the Seoul in (S.Korea) and the Shanghai in question is the Shanghai in (PRC). Why do we need to be told that Seoul is in South Korea? How many Seouls are there? Why is it necessary to specify that Shanghai is in China? How many Shanghais might there be that would confuse the reader? This is amateurish and sloppy (but fitting of Wikipedia). Keep up the good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.220.193.142 (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Complex Controlling System in the Tower

I once heard a minor tidbit news. It's a news that the new expansion of the Haneda Airport in October 2010 would make the duties in the control tower more difficult and complex. And it could be a potential safety problem. Does anybody have a link to that news in Japanese or English? Komitsuki (talk) 00:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates should always contain the YEAR

The article contains a lot of date information. But those dates do not include the year. This is incomplete information. Reading an article and guessing like is it 2010 or 2011 is not good. (84.163.142.46 (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Mongolia service

As far as I can tell, the charter flights between HND and Mongolia were for very limited periods and were not conducted in 2013, so I have removed these from the airlines and destinations list. Sekicho (talk) 04:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United, Virgin Atlantic, and Air France future services

Please read WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, all new services must have a exact date (Day, Month, Year) in order to qualify for listing. Please take this up at the project talk page if anyone have any objections. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]