Talk:UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:05, 30 October 2013

College basketball Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The request to rename this article to UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

– Consistency with UT Martin Skyhawks, the way the University of Tennessee at Martin self-identifies for athletics. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per common usage. As far as I can see, no real reason not to. 2010 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team, 2011 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team, 2012–13 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks men's basketball team, and the family of Category:Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks should all be moved as well. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per common usage. ESPN the worldwide leader, USA Today, and Sporting News all use Tennessee–Martin. Also, UT can be confused with the University of Texas similar to UT Arlington. I think the entire family should use Tennessee–Martin. -AllisonFoley (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - The direction at WP:CBBALL has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by User:AllisonFoley. I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage). To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin." Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move. I am not hard over on this opinion, though. Rikster2 (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * '''Support''' Per common usage. As far as I can see, no real reason not to. [[2010 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team]], [[2011 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team]], [[2012–13 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks men's basketball team]], and the family of [[:Category:Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks]] should all be moved as well. [[User:Ejgreen77|Ejgreen77]] ([[User talk:Ejgreen77|talk]]) 18:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * '''Oppose''' Per common usage. ESPN the worldwide leader, USA Today, and Sporting News all use Tennessee–Martin. Also, UT can be confused with the University of Texas similar to UT Arlington. I think the entire family should use Tennessee–Martin. -[[User:AllisonFoley|AllisonFoley]] ([[User talk:AllisonFoley|talk]]) 18:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
-*'''Weak Oppose''' - The direction at [[WP:College Basketball]] has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by [[User:AllisonFoley]].  I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage).  To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin."  Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move.  I am not hard over on this opinion, though. [[User:Rikster2|Rikster2]] ([[User talk:Rikster2|talk]]) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
+*'''Weak Oppose''' - The direction at [[WP:CBBALL]] has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by [[User:AllisonFoley]].  I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage).  To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin."  Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move.  I am not hard over on this opinion, though. [[User:Rikster2|Rikster2]] ([[User talk:Rikster2|talk]]) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)