Talk:UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Arbor to SJ (talk | contribs) →Requested move: cmt |
Paulmcdonald (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
**ESPN also uses "UT Martin" [http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/schedule/_/id/2634/tennessee-state-tigers] [[User:Arbor to SJ|Arbor to SJ]] ([[User talk:Arbor to SJ|talk]]) 19:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
**ESPN also uses "UT Martin" [http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/schedule/_/id/2634/tennessee-state-tigers] [[User:Arbor to SJ|Arbor to SJ]] ([[User talk:Arbor to SJ|talk]]) 19:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak Oppose''' - The direction at [[WP:CBBALL]] has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by [[User:AllisonFoley]]. I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage). To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin." Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move. I am not hard over on this opinion, though. [[User:Rikster2|Rikster2]] ([[User talk:Rikster2|talk]]) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Weak Oppose''' - The direction at [[WP:CBBALL]] has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by [[User:AllisonFoley]]. I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage). To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin." Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move. I am not hard over on this opinion, though. [[User:Rikster2|Rikster2]] ([[User talk:Rikster2|talk]]) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' the term "UT" is too generic and unclear. Is there a University of Texas-Martin? Or University of Tallahassee-Martin? Or Tahiti? Or could it be confused with Utah... or could there be any of these in the future, or in the past? Or a professional or other amateur team that could fit the "UT-Martin" style? "Tennessee-Martin" fits our standard naming convention because it really helps when looking up the subject. It's clear, it's obvious.--[[User:Paulmcdonald|Paul McDonald]] ([[User talk:Paulmcdonald|talk]]) 15:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:00, 4 November 2013
College basketball Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Requested move
The request to rename this article to UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
- Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks men's basketball → UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball
- Template:Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks men's basketball coach navbox → Template:UT Martin Skyhawks men's basketball coach navbox
- Template:Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football navbox → Template:UT Martin Skyhawks football navbox
– Consistency with UT Martin Skyhawks, the way the University of Tennessee at Martin self-identifies for athletics. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support Per common usage. As far as I can see, no real reason not to. 2010 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team, 2011 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks football team, 2012–13 Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks men's basketball team, and the family of Category:Tennessee–Martin Skyhawks should all be moved as well. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per common usage. ESPN the worldwide leader, USA Today, and Sporting News all use Tennessee–Martin. Also, UT can be confused with the University of Texas similar to UT Arlington. I think the entire family should use Tennessee–Martin. -AllisonFoley (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- ESPN also uses "UT Martin" [1] Arbor to SJ (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - The direction at WP:CBBALL has been to use the self-identifying names where they are clear (e.g. USC, LSU, BYU, etc.) but this case has conflicting usage as pointed out by User:AllisonFoley. I think we should wait until the abbreviated name is fully in the public eye (in other words, adopted by most reputable news services as acceptable usage). To me there is a big drop in brand awareness from "USC" to "UT Martin." Part of the point is clarity, and I'm not sure that would be achieved by this move. I am not hard over on this opinion, though. Rikster2 (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose the term "UT" is too generic and unclear. Is there a University of Texas-Martin? Or University of Tallahassee-Martin? Or Tahiti? Or could it be confused with Utah... or could there be any of these in the future, or in the past? Or a professional or other amateur team that could fit the "UT-Martin" style? "Tennessee-Martin" fits our standard naming convention because it really helps when looking up the subject. It's clear, it's obvious.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)