Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amvona (site): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:03, 5 November 2013

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amvona (site)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amvona.com has been described as "one of the most famous faith-based news sites today". On six occasions, articles about the site were posted at Amvona, but all were deleted, some after discussion (1, 2). A citation in this new article tells of the latest development in the history of the site: Photoflex settled a lawsuit brought against it by Amvona, paying $100,000.00 US Dollars. The story also tells us that Amvona "closed its retail presence in 2010 to focus on its blog". This is the reason the new Wikipedia article is called "Amvona (site)". The site is the brainchild of the Rev. Fr. Emmanuel Gregory Lemelson, whose posts have been reposted by theburningplatform.com and Zero Hedge. Lemelson has created a profile for the company on the prestitious CrunchBase Web site.

In 2009, prior to the divestiture of its photographic accessories business, the company was the subject of a full-length article in the North Attleboro, Massachusetts Sun Chronicle. The article hails amvona.com's "new marketing-social networking platform that blends some of the personal networking attibutes of Facebook with characteristics of commercial sites like Amazon.com and zillow."

In 2008, Mashable applauded Amvona (site) for its site-specific search. The search platform, dubbed "Amvona Trails", was the only search engine designed to show results only from the amvona.com site. Another achievement in search engine technology was Discovery, which the company called "revolutionary"; the company designed the Corridor, an online gallery where photographers can arrange their images by "clicking and dragging thumbnails into collections." —rybec 22:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable fails WP:NWEB Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources could be found that indicate this site has significance to pass the GNG. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was  '''delete'''. --[[User:BDD|BDD]] ([[User talk:BDD|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 ===[[Amvona (site)]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
 :{{la|Amvona (site)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amvona (site)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 October 29#{{anchorencode:Amvona (site)}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amvona_(site) Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 17: / Line 23: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Delete''' No reliable sources could be found that indicate this site has significance to pass the GNG. [[User:Livitup|<span style="color:#006">Liv</span><span style="color:#06F">it</span><span style="color:#006">'''⇑'''</span>]][[User talk:Livitup|<sup>Eh?</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Livitup|<sub>What?</sub>]] 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>