Jump to content

User talk:Djing1985: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kimchi.sg (talk | contribs)
add in
Copied from my talk page
 
Line 27: Line 27:


:You may have better luck keeping your new articles from being re-deleted if you politely ask for a review of the deletions at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] instead of re-creating them straightaway. [[User talk:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi]].[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kimchi.sg&action=edit&section=new sg] 18:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
:You may have better luck keeping your new articles from being re-deleted if you politely ask for a review of the deletions at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] instead of re-creating them straightaway. [[User talk:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi]].[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kimchi.sg&action=edit&section=new sg] 18:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

== Starting to get on my nerves ==

Why is it deleted just answer me that?! Have you read those books and discredited me? Or even looked on google?

Secondly dont just threaten user with being blocked its pathetic (appart from teh fact that in order to block me you would have to block a 1000+ computer as i am sitting right next to a university library....and that would mean you would block a considerable amount of uni posters), this is my first day here and i have done everything to this article to make it suiatble it has gone trhough considerable change since its first release, and yet people come along disagree and just delete it!

In my personal opinion admins have far too much power you just delete it and then expect me not to complain, its pathetic....now answer me this why do you not like it? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Djing1985|Djing1985]] ([[User talk:Djing1985|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djing1985|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>

:You will have ample opportunity to argue your case for this article if you follow the deletion review process. Thanks [[User:TigerShark|TigerShark]] 18:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:39, 11 June 2006

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Bassett may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. FreplySpang 16:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you want to leave a note on someone's talk page without messing up previous conversations, the easiest way is to use the "+" tab at the top of the screen. FreplySpang 16:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at our page on Your first article for some suggestions on how to write articles that meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. FreplySpang 16:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you mean by "setting up the message feature," but information on how to use "talk pages" is at Help:Talk page. The "Mark Bassett" article that you have posted does not meet our standards for inclusion. If you intend to improve it with reliable references, please prepare the article off-line, either on your own computer or in your user space on Wikipedia. More information about user pages and user space is at Wikipedia:User page. FreplySpang 16:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, I recommend that you should look at the page on Your first article. I think you may have misunderstood the kinds of articles that we accept. FreplySpang 16:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Bassett

[edit]

You have recently created the article Mark Bassett. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. TigerShark 18:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right first why delete a page that is under discusion!!!???
I have read the delation policy and totla disagree with why your deleteing it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djing1985 (talkcontribs) .
Why delete my page it is no offensive and in no way is wrong if you dont understand it, i suggest you go pick up the refrences and read them! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djing1985 (talkcontribs) .
The content was previously deleted in accordance with the deletion policies. If you feel that the article should be undeleted then follow the process mentioned above. Do not keep recreating the article without following the process, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks TigerShark 18:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Get the facts before you act!

[edit]

The page you delted has been edited several times after each time it was deleted, did you even read the discusion?

give me a good reason why it was delted and i will see if i can change it but for now i will continue to repost it as i see fit because i consider it to be correct, if you have a problem with it change it!! dont just delete it!

Jack! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djing1985 (talkcontribs) .

If you keep recreating it without following the correct process, you will be blocked. Thanks TigerShark 18:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You may have better luck keeping your new articles from being re-deleted if you politely ask for a review of the deletions at Wikipedia:Deletion review instead of re-creating them straightaway. Kimchi.sg 18:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Starting to get on my nerves

[edit]

Why is it deleted just answer me that?! Have you read those books and discredited me? Or even looked on google?

Secondly dont just threaten user with being blocked its pathetic (appart from teh fact that in order to block me you would have to block a 1000+ computer as i am sitting right next to a university library....and that would mean you would block a considerable amount of uni posters), this is my first day here and i have done everything to this article to make it suiatble it has gone trhough considerable change since its first release, and yet people come along disagree and just delete it!

In my personal opinion admins have far too much power you just delete it and then expect me not to complain, its pathetic....now answer me this why do you not like it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djing1985 (talkcontribs) .

You will have ample opportunity to argue your case for this article if you follow the deletion review process. Thanks TigerShark 18:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]