Talk:Language proficiency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Adding picture == |
== Adding picture == |
||
How do you think I can add this picture in the article? |
How do you think I can add this picture in the article? [[:File:Proficiency.PNG]] [[User:Gudach|Gudach]] ([[User talk:Gudach|talk]]) 06:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Read [[WP:FILE]]. But I do not understand clearly what the image means. And where did it come from?--[[User:Любослов Езыкин|Lüboslóv Yęzýkin]] ([[User talk:Любослов Езыкин|talk]]) 13:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:21, 25 November 2013
Education Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Still working on this. Hoping to be done by 3.30 UTC.samwaltz 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
In civil aviation
Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (Language Proficiency Endorsement) that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Proficiency tests
Based on which criteria were the named "Proficiency tests" selected? Amount of native speaker population? Random addition? ... I think in all fairness there should be a certain "selective bias" exerted here, i.e. one might even "rank" the mentioned tests after one or the other criteria, as mentioned above. I say all this because, firstly Wikipedia is about relevance and secondly I truly believe that whatever Wikipedia serves to readers might - in some cases - lead them (learners) to pick up a certain language or not.. --Philipp Grunwald (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Adding picture
How do you think I can add this picture in the article? File:Proficiency.PNG Gudach (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Read WP:FILE. But I do not understand clearly what the image means. And where did it come from?--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)