Jump to content

User talk:Earthsphere: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 63: Line 63:
:As to your second question, I am very glad you are being so careful with copyright! In this case, it's not a problem. The source can copyright ''creative'' content, which includes how things are worded, so it's important not to copy the exact wording. And if a list is subjective (for instance, if someone made a list of the "50 best C.Z. paintings" in their opinion), then that list might be copyrighted. But this one is an objective list. It's a list of all paintings by C.Z. in the Lithuanian Art Museum, sorted by date. That information is not creative, and is not subject to copyright, so it's not a problem to include it here. (See ''[[Feist v. Rural]]'' for more information.)
:As to your second question, I am very glad you are being so careful with copyright! In this case, it's not a problem. The source can copyright ''creative'' content, which includes how things are worded, so it's important not to copy the exact wording. And if a list is subjective (for instance, if someone made a list of the "50 best C.Z. paintings" in their opinion), then that list might be copyrighted. But this one is an objective list. It's a list of all paintings by C.Z. in the Lithuanian Art Museum, sorted by date. That information is not creative, and is not subject to copyright, so it's not a problem to include it here. (See ''[[Feist v. Rural]]'' for more information.)
:Thanks again for your remarkable contributions to Wikipedia. <span class="nowrap">&ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup></span> 00:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks again for your remarkable contributions to Wikipedia. <span class="nowrap">&ndash; [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup></span> 00:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Quadell. Understood, that is how I saw it but wanted to be sure. I finished this article, now just have some linking and clean up to to do. Again thanks for the complements! It was great working with you. Best regards! [[User:Earthsphere|Earthsphere]] ([[User talk:Earthsphere#top|talk]]) 19:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:41, 26 November 2013

Your submission at AfC Soviet Jewelry (August 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at AfC Soviet jewelry was accepted

Soviet jewelry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Czeslaw Znamierowski (November 19)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Earthsphere, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Hello, Earthsphere. You have new messages at Quadell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at AfC Czeslaw Znamierowski was accepted

Czeslaw Znamierowski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Quadell (talk) 19:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Earthsphere. I am very impressed with the additions you've been making at Czeslaw Znamierowski. I have combined some of the references. I hope this makes it easier for you to add sources for new material. I'll continue to assist with formatting help. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Quadell (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a reply for you at User talk:Quadell#Earthshpere. Quadell (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quadell hi. Thanks for continuing to help with the article, especially linking the sources - a question about them: I see that you are linking each source to the official page which is great, but what if that page goes offline for what ever reasons. Just a thought, no biggie. On a more important matter, I added a three column table in the artworks chapter and in the first column I listed all C.Z. artworks that are int the Lithuanian Art Museum (source #2). I wanted you to take a look to make sure I did not violate any copyrights. I translated, edited, modified and added to each artwork so this was not a copy/paste job. I also provided a source reference to each artwork. They are however in the exact order as on the museums site because I'm keeping everything in the chronological order and that is how they were already. Please let me know if that is acceptable, and if not how to present it because that list of artworks is important to the overall article. Cheers! Earthsphere (talk) 01:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As to your first question, if the online source for the book or newspaper article goes offline, we'll still have the name of the newspaper and the article, so it's not terrible. But there's also a way to make a "web archive", so if the original source disappears, you still have an archive available. I'm not sure how to do that exactly, but if I figure it out I'll let you know.
As to your second question, I am very glad you are being so careful with copyright! In this case, it's not a problem. The source can copyright creative content, which includes how things are worded, so it's important not to copy the exact wording. And if a list is subjective (for instance, if someone made a list of the "50 best C.Z. paintings" in their opinion), then that list might be copyrighted. But this one is an objective list. It's a list of all paintings by C.Z. in the Lithuanian Art Museum, sorted by date. That information is not creative, and is not subject to copyright, so it's not a problem to include it here. (See Feist v. Rural for more information.)
Thanks again for your remarkable contributions to Wikipedia. Quadell (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Quadell. Understood, that is how I saw it but wanted to be sure. I finished this article, now just have some linking and clean up to to do. Again thanks for the complements! It was great working with you. Best regards! Earthsphere (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]