Schur product theorem: Difference between revisions
link to text at EUDML |
m Checkwiki 61 + General Fixes using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], particularly in [[linear algebra]], the '''Schur product theorem''' states that the [[ |
In [[mathematics]], particularly in [[linear algebra]], the '''Schur product theorem''' states that the [[Hadamard product (matrices)|Hadamard product]] of two [[positive definite matrices]] is also a positive definite matrix. The result is named after [[Issai Schur]]<ref name="Sch1911">{{Cite doi|10.1515/crll.1911.140.1}}</ref> (Schur 1911, p. 14, Theorem VII) (note that Schur signed as J. Schur in ''Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik''.<ref>{{Cite doi|10.1007/b105056}}, page 9, Ch. 0.6 ''Publication under J. Schur''</ref><ref>{{Cite doi|10.1112/blms/15.2.97}}</ref>) |
||
== Proof == |
== Proof == |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It is easy to show that for matrices <math>M</math> and <math>N</math>, the Hadamard product <math>M \circ N</math> considered as a bilinear form acts on vectors <math>a, b</math> as |
It is easy to show that for matrices <math>M</math> and <math>N</math>, the Hadamard product <math>M \circ N</math> considered as a bilinear form acts on vectors <math>a, b</math> as |
||
: <math>a^T (M \circ N) b = \operatorname{Tr}(M \operatorname{diag}(a) N \operatorname{diag}(b))</math> |
: <math>a^T (M \circ N) b = \operatorname{Tr}(M \operatorname{diag}(a) N \operatorname{diag}(b))</math> |
||
where <math>\operatorname{Tr}</math> is the matrix [[ |
where <math>\operatorname{Tr}</math> is the matrix [[Trace (linear algebra)|trace]] and <math>\operatorname{diag}(a)</math> is the [[diagonal matrix]] having as diagonal entries the elements of <math>a</math>. |
||
Since <math>M</math> and <math>N</math> are positive definite, we can consider their square-roots <math>M^{1/2}</math> and <math>N^{1/2}</math> and write |
Since <math>M</math> and <math>N</math> are positive definite, we can consider their square-roots <math>M^{1/2}</math> and <math>N^{1/2}</math> and write |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Let <math>M = \sum \mu_i m_i m_i^T</math> and <math>N = \sum \nu_i n_i n_i^T</math>. Then |
Let <math>M = \sum \mu_i m_i m_i^T</math> and <math>N = \sum \nu_i n_i n_i^T</math>. Then |
||
: <math>M \circ N = \sum_{ij} \mu_i \nu_i (m_i m_i^T) \circ (n_i n_i^T) = \sum_{ij} \mu_i \nu_j (m_i \circ n_j) (m_i \circ n_j)^T</math> |
: <math>M \circ N = \sum_{ij} \mu_i \nu_i (m_i m_i^T) \circ (n_i n_i^T) = \sum_{ij} \mu_i \nu_j (m_i \circ n_j) (m_i \circ n_j)^T</math> |
||
Each <math>(m_i \circ n_j) (m_i \circ n_j)^T</math> is positive (but, except in the 1-dimensional case, not positive definite, since they are [[ |
Each <math>(m_i \circ n_j) (m_i \circ n_j)^T</math> is positive (but, except in the 1-dimensional case, not positive definite, since they are [[Rank (linear algebra)|rank]] 1 matrices) and <math>\mu_i \nu_j > 0</math>, thus the sum giving <math>M \circ N</math> is also positive. |
||
==== Complete proof ==== |
==== Complete proof ==== |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Linear algebra]] |
[[Category:Linear algebra]] |
Revision as of 01:51, 27 November 2013
In mathematics, particularly in linear algebra, the Schur product theorem states that the Hadamard product of two positive definite matrices is also a positive definite matrix. The result is named after Issai Schur[1] (Schur 1911, p. 14, Theorem VII) (note that Schur signed as J. Schur in Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik.[2][3])
Proof
Proof using the trace formula
It is easy to show that for matrices and , the Hadamard product considered as a bilinear form acts on vectors as
where is the matrix trace and is the diagonal matrix having as diagonal entries the elements of .
Since and are positive definite, we can consider their square-roots and and write
Then, for , this is written as for and thus is positive. This shows that is a positive definite matrix.
Proof using Gaussian integration
Case of M = N
Let be an -dimensional centered Gaussian random variable with covariance . Then the covariance matrix of and is
Using Wick's theorem to develop we have
Since a covariance matrix is positive definite, this proves that the matrix with elements is a positive definite matrix.
General case
Let and be -dimensional centered Gaussian random variables with covariances , and independt from each other so that we have
- for any
Then the covariance matrix of and is
Using Wick's theorem to develop
and also using the independence of and , we have
Since a covariance matrix is positive definite, this proves that the matrix with elements is a positive definite matrix.
Proof using eigendecomposition
Proof of positivity
Let and . Then
Each is positive (but, except in the 1-dimensional case, not positive definite, since they are rank 1 matrices) and , thus the sum giving is also positive.
Complete proof
To show that the result is positive definite requires further proof. We shall show that for any vector , we have . Continuing as above, each , so it remains to show that there exist and for which the inequality is strict. For this we observe that
Since is positive definite, there is a for which is not 0 for all , and then, since is positive definite, there is an for which is not 0 for all . Then for this and we have . This completes the proof.
References
- ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1515/crll.1911.140.1, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1515/crll.1911.140.1
instead. - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/b105056, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1007/b105056
instead., page 9, Ch. 0.6 Publication under J. Schur - ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1112/blms/15.2.97, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1112/blms/15.2.97
instead.