Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
recommend relist |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> |
||
====[[:Holy Knights]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|Holy Knights|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Holy_Knights|article=}} |
|||
The band now satisfies criterion 5 of [[WP:MUSIC]] by virtue of releasing a second album via [[Scarlet Records]] [http://www.scarletrecords.it/bands/Holy%20Knights/band.htm]. Therefore, the articles for the band and their first album, [[A Gate Through the Past]] should now be restored. The closing admin has been contacted - to no avail. [[User:Óðinn|Óðinn ]] ([[User talk:Óðinn|talk]]) 05:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Mystic Bourbon Liqueur]]==== |
====[[:Mystic Bourbon Liqueur]]==== |
||
:{{DRV links|Mystic Bourbon Liqueur|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mystic_Bourbon_Liqueur|article=}} |
:{{DRV links|Mystic Bourbon Liqueur|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mystic_Bourbon_Liqueur|article=}} |
||
Revision as of 05:39, 2 December 2013
The band now satisfies criterion 5 of WP:MUSIC by virtue of releasing a second album via Scarlet Records [1]. Therefore, the articles for the band and their first album, A Gate Through the Past should now be restored. The closing admin has been contacted - to no avail. Óðinn (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
The article was neutral and non-promotional and was the subject of an ongoing discussion. The deletion was premature. Blitzlaw (talk) 03:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- temporarily restored for discussion at Deletion Review DGG ( talk ) 03:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Overturn speedy deletion and relist at AfD. The article did have one independent source (Triangle Business Journal) and I think that it would have been more appropriate to allow the AfD discussion to run for a full week rather than speedily deleting the article as promotional. It's possible that the article might have had its promotional aspects toned down and become more neutral during the AfD period. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)