Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhiathArodaki: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sopher99 (talk | contribs)
Remove incorrect header
Line 19: Line 19:


I request an spi,to confirm that Daki122 is a sockpuppet.[[User:Alhanuty|Alhanuty]] ([[User talk:Alhanuty|talk]]) 18:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I request an spi,to confirm that Daki122 is a sockpuppet.[[User:Alhanuty|Alhanuty]] ([[User talk:Alhanuty|talk]]) 18:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

==== HEADER ====
{{SPIquick}}


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======

Revision as of 04:54, 5 December 2013

GhiathArodaki

GhiathArodaki (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhiathArodaki/Archive.



01 December 2013

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


both editors are stubborn in forcing their point of view and they didn't care for block,and both tend to take a pro-Assad stance in their edits,not editing in good faith,I recommend an spi investigation,and also,both have Daki in their names,increasing suspicision,please investigate and check if Daki is a sock puppet of giatharrodaki.Alhanuty (talk) 04:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Alhanuty (talk) 04:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I request an spi,to confirm that Daki122 is a sockpuppet.Alhanuty (talk) 18:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I agree, kind of looks obvious. Sopher99 (talk) 13:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments