User talk:200.55.213.30

Attention:

This IP address, 200.55.213.30, is registered to Nido de Aguilas and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Nido de Aguilas to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Administrator is claimed to be rarce@nido.cl and any vandalism should be reported to that person.

This user has been repeatedly warned against vandalism and blanking. The user often blanks this discussion page or removes specific comments which makes it harder to keep track of the number of times the user has been warned and blocked. Nevertheless, with the latest block in place, I am hoping that the user has cooled down enough to give up the vandalism. We can hope. --Yamla 19:48, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

You hope WAYYYYYY too much. --User:200.55.213.30, 10:02, September 12, 2005 (unsigned comment)

I don't know where to put this, but I(not the guy vandalizing) would like to note that this is a high school's IP address, in case anyone didn't know.

I've added that information to the top of the page. Could you please let us know which high school, along with the contact information for the school administer, so that appropriate disciplinary actions can be taken against the vandals at that school? If you personally would like to be unblocked, set yourself up with an account and leave a message on my talk page. Note that with vandals operating from this IP address, your account may occasionally be blocked as a side-effect. It won't be anything personal, though. --Yamla 16:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The school is called Nido de Aguilas and I'm not sure who's in charge of the computers, but one of the people in charge is rarce@nido.cl

April 2005

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!.

Pavel Vozenilek 18:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

August 2005

Ricardo Lagos

Hi, your changes on the article mentioned above are considered to be vandalism. Repeated vandalism on Wikipedia will result in a ban from further editing.--BaronLarf 16:53, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

--BaronLarf 17:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

September 2005

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Yamla 22:42, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- GraemeL ^(talk) 16:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the article [[]]. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- GraemeL ^(talk) 17:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.. Thryduulf 17:01, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. - jredmond 17:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Attack on own user's talk page

I don't know if this counts as vandalism, but the user added over four megabytes of garbage to the user's own discussion page. This causes problems with wikipedia, let alone the fact that Wikipedia's bandwidth is being used up for garbage. As the user has been warned numerous times and blocked several times, I am requesting an additional block.

So I should get banned for vandalizing my own page. Cool. DO you think it is cool? Cause I do! I think that I should get completely banned. Do you think so? Cause I do. I like waffles. Do you like waffles. Cause I do. I think wikipedia is misinformation. do you think so? Cause I do. --Unsigned comment from User:200.55.213.30, 10:00, September 12, 2005. I snipped several megabytes of vandalism. --Yamla 17:07, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for two weeks from editing Wikipedia. Despite multiple warnings to cease your vandalism, you chose to ignore them. Text dumping on Wikipedia - regardless in which namespace it is done - is thoroughly unappreciated here. So is repeated insertion of inflammatory material to articles.

Once the block expires, you are free to make constructive edits to the encyclopedia. Should you choose to continue your previous inappropriate editing behaviour, you will be blocked much longer. Thanks for your understanding. --HappyCamper 17:43, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

Theoretically for how much time can i get banned?--Unsigned comment from User:200.55.213.30, 13:04, September 13, 2005.

We can make indefinite blocks, should the situation warrant. - jredmond 17:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

October 2005

This message is regarding the article Wario. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [ contribs • block • block log ] -- ≈ jossi fresco ≈ 15:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the article Iannis Xenakis. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribs • block • block log ] -- GraemeL ^(talk) 15:33, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ashenai (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 16:03, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

BLOCKED for ONE WEEK!

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. FireFox 16:09, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Donde Estan Los Ladrones

• I have told you repeatedly that if this track is a hidden track, you must specify which pressing it's on. It's definitely not on the American version, as I know multiple people who have the album, and not one reports that track to be on it. Danny Lilithborne 07:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Why?

Anonymous user at 200.55.213.30, why do you bother with the vandalism? You waste your own time, you waste our time, and everything gets reverted anyway. Half the time, someone has blocked you from editing. Do you really have nothing better to do with your life? --Yamla 17:09, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Nay, I say unto thou, nay. 200.55.213.30 15:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

10 November 2005 vandalism warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Edgar Allan Poe. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JoanneB 16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Continued vandalism

You have been warned countless times about vandalism. You have been blocked repeatedly. You have promised to continue vandalising pages. It seems that you have no intention of ever performing any legitimate edits. For this reason, I have requested another block. Should you perform any more acts of vandalism, I will request a permanent block. Please stop. --Yamla 16:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

OK, whatever, I'll stop. Chill. -- unsigned comment from 200.55.213.30 09:00, 15 November 2005 (MST)

You don't even say thank you, Yamla. -- unsigned comment from 200.55.213.30 13:05, 16 November 2005 (MST)

You didn't stop vandalising articles. Why should I thank you for not stopping vandalising? --Yamla 16:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

I did, liar.

Here are some of the instances of vandalism perpetrated by you since you stated you'd stop vandalising:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

How does this count as stopping, and why does this continual vandalism warrant a thank you from me? --Yamla 16:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

20 Feb 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Sure Thing. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Where ^(talk) 15:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Yo no se de lo que usted esta hablando. Comuniquese en español por favor.

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. This block is for a full month as you have previously been blocked multiple times. If you persist in vandalising the Wikipedia, we can block you permanently. --Yamla 15:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the recent block

Dear Yamla, I have been enraged beyond what is healthy for your life due to ther lastest block against me. I was never told of any block, and I believe it is Wikipedia policy to announce blocks on user's talk pages. As soon as I'm unblock, I will request that you be removed from your post as admin. With the minimum necessary amount of respect, --Ricardo Lagos

I'm sorry you feel it necessary to threaten my life. However, given that you have been warned more than twenty times to stop vandalising articles. You have previously promised to stop, only to immediately continue vandalising. You have implied that you have no intention of stopping your vandalism. And you were indeed told about the block. The block notice is immediately above your most recent comment. Now, it is quite possible there is some reason to believe you do not warrant this seventh block. If so, please state your case here and I or another admin will look into it. --Yamla 16:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The block above is not, I believe, the one I'm talking about. Now, as I have said before, I'll report you as soon as I'm unblocked. As this is currently not the case, I shall continue gathering evidence against you. With the minimum necessary amount of respect, --Edgar Allan Poe.

The only block currently active on this IP address is the one listed above. It was placed at 08:52, February 20, 2006 (this is PROBABLY mountain standard time) by me. It is the first block I have placed on this account, though six other editors have placed previous blocks. As you can see, you were notified within three minutes. Now, as I say, if you have some valid reason to claim this block was not jusified, please speak up. Note, though, that the claims of vandalism are legitimate. --Yamla 16:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

You are correct, I'm apologize deeply. I misunderstud the duration of the block and falsely thought there was another block. --Ricardo Lagos.

Your recent edit to Sweden was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. /Magore 20:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Stomach. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Venezuela

Your recent edit to Venezuela was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)