Jump to content

Talk:Stable homotopy theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Alodyne (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Stub uprated to Start using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{maths rating|class=Stub|priority=Low|field=topology}}
{{maths rating|class=start|priority=Low|field=topology}}





Revision as of 05:59, 14 December 2013

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.


I feel like there ought to be a page dedicated to discussion of the _stable_ homotopy groups of spheres, in isolation from the unstable case. (At the moment, the page for _stable_ redirects to Homotopy Groups of Spheres.) I don't know all that much about it (since I'm not a homotopy theorist), but I know the theory underlying the computation of the stable stems is quite rich and technical, to the extent that it makes sense to discuss it in a separate place from the "naive" (meant non-perjoratively) theory of the unstable groups. Any thoughts, please let me know. Especially if you want to write the article. ;) --Artie p 16:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree completely. I've tried several times to begin such an article and also to expand this one, but I'm always stumped about how to go about it. Stable homotopy theory has developed in such an encyclopedic way that it's hard for me to see the right/best way to discuss it. I'm still thinking about it, perhaps I will post drafts at my talk page. Alodyne (talk) 00:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]