Jump to content

Talk:Construction set: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
add copied
m Stub uprated to Start using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Toys|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Toys|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Lego|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Lego|class=start|importance=low}}
{{Copied|from=Psychological benefits of construction toys|from_diff=563169494|to=Construction set|to_diff=563169585|July 6, 2013}}
{{Copied|from=Psychological benefits of construction toys|from_diff=563169494|to=Construction set|to_diff=563169585|July 6, 2013}}


Revision as of 16:49, 14 December 2013

WikiProject iconToys Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Toys To-do:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconLego Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion vote in 2005

For the 1 July 2005 Vote for deletion resulting in move (keep), see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Constructions set. -- Jonel | Speak 03:12, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Major revision

My major revision was prompted by my realization that I have never seen a strut system based on a D6h node. Eassin 21:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining the notation

I think it would be worthwhile to explain what the notation in the examples means, e.g. C2v (*22) nodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.36.192.101 (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Add Cleversticks

Please consider adding Cleversticks to the list of construction toys Arlington row (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split between industrial and toys

Someone should divide the article content between "toys" and industrial components. --70.142.41.253 (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

== Construction Set Comparison ==
Could someone please make a graph which compares
1) What each set does or does not have
2) The size of each of the units it has
I want to buy the best set I can for some novice practise engineering but am not sure what is the best novice option
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.124.73.132 (talk) 05:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is useful to list sets by category like that. Most systems have components in more than one category - for example Technical Lego is listed separately from Lego, althhough it is compatible with the Lego brick-and-stud system. Similarly Fischertechnik is listed only as a brick-and-stud system, but it also has panels and struts held together by plastic twist fasteners in a similar manner to the Meccano nuts and bolts. So I agree we need a matrix to say what features each system has and doesn't have, rather than the division into (somewhat arbitrary) categories. Philbelb (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Construction_set&oldid=586064114"