Talk:Kathy Clark: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:51, 21 December 2013

I'm writing regarding the proposed author page for Kathy Clark (American author).

It was patterned after all the other author pages in content but has been flagged for deletion. I ma unclear as to what or what to do about it. The references or links are to various award sites and external sites where some of the more recent books have been referenced but the first 23 and the screenplays do not have references other than their buy links which is not what this is abut.

I need to know what to do to make it right.

Nightwriter93 (talk) 04:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Bob Wernly for Kathy Clark[reply]

@Nightwriter93:That's because it needs verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject meets notability requirements. Cite where you got the information. Especially useful will be links to any awards. A review by the New York Times would not hurt. ANy reviews or profiles by major national papers. The more in=depth coverage from sources not connected with the subject, the better. Dloh cierekim 04:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:46, 21 December 2013 edit Nightwriter93 (talk \| contribs) 82 edits ←Created page with 'I'm writing regarding the proposed author page for Kathy Clark (American author). It was patterned after all the other author pages in content but has been flag...'		Revision as of 04:51, 21 December 2013 edit undo Deepfriedokra (talk \| contribs) Administrators 173,295 edits REPLY-- it's always about WP:42 Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[User:Nightwriter93\|Nightwriter93]] ([[User talk:Nightwriter93\|talk]]) 04:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Bob Wernly for Kathy Clark		[[User:Nightwriter93\|Nightwriter93]] ([[User talk:Nightwriter93\|talk]]) 04:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Bob Wernly for Kathy Clark
			:{{reply\|Nightwriter93}}That's because it needs [[WP:42\|verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject]] meets [[WP:GNG\|notability requirements]]. Cite where you got the information. Especially useful will be links to any awards. A review by the New York Times would not hurt. ANy reviews or profiles by major national papers. The more in=depth coverage from sources not connected with the subject, the better.[[User:Dlohcierekim\| <font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim\|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 04:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)