Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakura Saunders: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
c
Mark Arsten (talk | contribs)
Relisting debate
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Sakura Saunders}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakura Saunders|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 16#{{anchorencode:Sakura Saunders}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sakura_Saunders Stats]</span>)
:{{la|Sakura Saunders}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakura Saunders|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 23#{{anchorencode:Sakura Saunders}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sakura_Saunders Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Sakura Saunders}})
:({{Find sources|Sakura Saunders}})
Seems to have limited to no notability. Most sources are from little known websites or blogs. [[User:Mrfrobinson|Mike]] ([[User talk:Mrfrobinson|talk]]) 15:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Seems to have limited to no notability. Most sources are from little known websites or blogs. [[User:Mrfrobinson|Mike]] ([[User talk:Mrfrobinson|talk]]) 15:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment''' Spent time searching and as nom said found unreliable/minor sources or trivial mentions. There are a lot of search results, so withholding vote to see what others might think or find. - [[User:Green Cardamom|<font color="#006A4E" size="2" face="Modern">'''GreenC'''</font>]] 21:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Spent time searching and as nom said found unreliable/minor sources or trivial mentions. There are a lot of search results, so withholding vote to see what others might think or find. - [[User:Green Cardamom|<font color="#006A4E" size="2" face="Modern">'''GreenC'''</font>]] 21:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 01:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />

Revision as of 01:42, 23 December 2013

Sakura Saunders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have limited to no notability. Most sources are from little known websites or blogs. Mike (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Spent time searching and as nom said found unreliable/minor sources or trivial mentions. There are a lot of search results, so withholding vote to see what others might think or find. - GreenC 21:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]