Jump to content

User talk:170.232.128.10: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cut it out: new section
No edit summary
Line 83: Line 83:
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MarianoRivero reported by User:Flat Out (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Flat Out|'''<font color="blue">Flat Out</font>]] [[User talk:Flat Out|<font color="red"><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">'''''let's discuss it'''''</span></font>]] 10:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.105.243.22|124.105.243.22]] ([[User talk:124.105.243.22|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MarianoRivero reported by User:Flat Out (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Flat Out|'''<font color="blue">Flat Out</font>]] [[User talk:Flat Out|<font color="red"><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">'''''let's discuss it'''''</span></font>]] 10:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.105.243.22|124.105.243.22]] ([[User talk:124.105.243.22|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Cut it out ==

I noticed that you posted a warning regarding edit warring [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:170.232.128.10&diff=prev&oldid=589509874 here] using my name and that you copied from another editors talk page. Do not do this again. [[User:Flat Out|'''<font color="blue">Flat Out</font>]] [[User talk:Flat Out|<font color="red"><span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">'''''let's discuss it'''''</span></font>]] 23:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:07, 6 January 2014

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 170.232.128.10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Wipsenade (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Breastfeeding with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. thoriyan 19:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abdisalam Ibrahim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Isopropyl alcohol , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

March 2013

Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ontario, Oregon because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Malushi, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/killision, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Google Voice may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in May 2014, which will stop service for 3rd party apps and devices like GVJack and Obitalk. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.obihai.com/2013/10/important-message-about-google-voice.html |title=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission David Malushi

Hello 170.232.128.10. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled David Malushi.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Malushi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chris Petersen because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius (talk) 14:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Boy Golden: Shoot to Kill, the Arturo Porcuna Story shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.243.22 (talk)

Your recent editing history at Girl, Boy, Bakla, Tomboy, the Arturo Porcuna Story shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.243.22 (talk)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MarianoRivero reported by User:Flat Out (Result: ). Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.243.22 (talk) [reply]