Template talk:WikiProject Visual arts: Difference between revisions
Freshacconci (talk | contribs) →Importance ratings: agree |
m Substing templates: {{EP}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Please add <nowiki>{{Portal|Arts}}</nowiki> to this template, below the main portal link for Visual arts. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please add <nowiki>{{Portal|Arts}}</nowiki> to this template, below the main portal link for Visual arts. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 07:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
: |
: [[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please be more specific about what needs to be changed.<!-- Template:EP --> Use <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template:WikiProject_Visual_arts/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template%3AWikiProject+Visual+arts&summary=Create+sandbox+version+of+%5B%5BTemplate%3AWikiProject+Visual+arts%5D%5D the sandbox]</span>. [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 01:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Importance ratings == |
== Importance ratings == |
||
Revision as of 13:21, 17 January 2014
 | Visual arts Template‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
missing C-class category
{{editprotected}} The template is not evaluating "c" as a category. As per discussion on the project page this should be corrected. The missing code appears to be
|c|C=[[Category:C-Class visual arts articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
Thanks Enki H. (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done. --- RockMFR 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Importance parameter
Should this not have a field for "importance", as in Template:WikiProject Pornography, and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? Ty 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. Johnbod (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Please replace image
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The current image (File:WPVisualArts.png) should be replaced with its SVG version, File:WPVisualArts.svg. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Please add portal
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add {{Portal|Arts}} to this template, below the main portal link for Visual arts. — Cirt (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Use the sandbox. Anomie⚔ 01:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Importance ratings
I've removed this parameter, I hope correctly, as the project has decided more than once that we don't do these. It was added 10 days or so ago. Please don't re-add without discussing at the main project talk page, not here. Johnbod (talk) 13:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Concur with Johnbod on this. I don't see the point of importance ratings as they are ambiguous and poorly assigned. VA articles have never had them and have not suffered because of this.freshacconci talktalk 16:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)