Jump to content

Talk:Super Smash Bros. (video game): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 70: Line 70:
:Is there something wrong with [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]]? If this page ends up getting moved I'd prefer that it get moved to that. '''[[User:The Stick Man|<font color="0000DD">TheStickMan</font>]]'''[[User talk:The Stick Man|<font color="0000DD"><sup>[✆Talk]</sup></font>]] 17:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
:Is there something wrong with [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]]? If this page ends up getting moved I'd prefer that it get moved to that. '''[[User:The Stick Man|<font color="0000DD">TheStickMan</font>]]'''[[User talk:The Stick Man|<font color="0000DD"><sup>[✆Talk]</sup></font>]] 17:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
*<small>(Copying my reply from [[WT:NIN]])</small> - Per convention, I think it should be [[Super Smash Bros.]] as the series article, [[Super Smash Bros. (series)]] as a redirect to [[Super Smash Bros.]], and [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]] as the N64 game article (with [[Super Smash Bros. (Nintendo 64)]] as a redirect to [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]]; period-less titles (such as [[Super Smash Bros (series)]]) and abbreviations (such as [[SSB64]]) can be redirects as needed. <span style="13px Sylfaen;color:white;background-color:#000000;padding:0 3px 0 3px;">☺&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User:Salvidrim!|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;"><span style="color:white">Salvidrim!</span></span>]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:Salvidrim!|<span style="color:white">&#9993;</span>]]</span> 15:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
*<small>(Copying my reply from [[WT:NIN]])</small> - Per convention, I think it should be [[Super Smash Bros.]] as the series article, [[Super Smash Bros. (series)]] as a redirect to [[Super Smash Bros.]], and [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]] as the N64 game article (with [[Super Smash Bros. (Nintendo 64)]] as a redirect to [[Super Smash Bros. (video game)]]; period-less titles (such as [[Super Smash Bros (series)]]) and abbreviations (such as [[SSB64]]) can be redirects as needed. <span style="13px Sylfaen;color:white;background-color:#000000;padding:0 3px 0 3px;">☺&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User:Salvidrim!|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;"><span style="color:white">Salvidrim!</span></span>]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:Salvidrim!|<span style="color:white">&#9993;</span>]]</span> 15:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
**Because of the possibility that the upcoming Smash titles will be simply "Super Smash Bros." to a lot of people, I've come to feel that calling the N64 game "video game" could have some confusion. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie|New Age Retro Hippie]] <small>[[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie|(talk)]]</small> <small>[[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie|(contributions)]]</small> 19:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:54, 20 January 2014

Good articleSuper Smash Bros. (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSuper Smash Bros. (video game) is part of the Super Smash Bros. series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 18, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
April 21, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 29, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
February 3, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 10, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 25, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo GA‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Note icon
This article was a past project collaboration.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

From Dolls to Trophies?

In SSBM and B, all the characters come to life from trophication by being touched, in SSB however, characters come to life from plush-like dolls, as shown in the opening sequence and the 'Continue?' screen. Why the change? Also, what ever happened to the characters turning in motion at the bottom screen? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.217.224 (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I feel that the image should be replaced with one that shows off the game's four-player mode. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 18:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm cool with this if a good image is found. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 01:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find one with Ness in it though :( - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 07:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say he's necessary. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He's necessary to meee. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 11:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A move of this page to Super Smash Bros. (Nintendo 64)

I don't feel that Super Smash Bros. on 64 is anywhere near noteworthy enough to hold onto the main title of the article. As we do with Castlevania (video game), The Legend of Zelda (video game), and Metroid (video game), we should disambig this and move the series page to Super Smash Bros.. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 14:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something wrong with Super Smash Bros. (video game)? If this page ends up getting moved I'd prefer that it get moved to that. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 17:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]