Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Christians: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ColonelHenry (talk | contribs) |
delete |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am nominating the article Free Christians for deletion as it has been deemed to be a hoax article by several Wikipedia users. See [[Talk:Free_Christians_(Britain)#Requested_move|here]] for more info. --[[User:Nived 90|Devin Murphy]] ([[User talk:Nived 90|talk]]) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
I am nominating the article Free Christians for deletion as it has been deemed to be a hoax article by several Wikipedia users. See [[Talk:Free_Christians_(Britain)#Requested_move|here]] for more info. --[[User:Nived 90|Devin Murphy]] ([[User talk:Nived 90|talk]]) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
* '''DELETE''' It doesn't seem to be notable to begin with, but if it is a hoax (as it appears), it '''ought to be speedy deleted under CSD G3.'''--[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 20:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
* '''DELETE''' It doesn't seem to be notable to begin with, but if it is a hoax (as it appears), it '''ought to be speedy deleted under CSD G3.'''--[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 20:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - even if it is not a hoax (the ''[[World Christian Encyclopedia]]'' reference seems to be genuine), this is almost entirely original research. [[User:StAnselm|<b>St</b>]][[Special:Contributions/StAnselm|Anselm]] ([[User talk:StAnselm|talk]]) 20:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:33, 27 January 2014
I am nominating the article Free Christians for deletion as it has been deemed to be a hoax article by several Wikipedia users. See here for more info. --Devin Murphy (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- DELETE It doesn't seem to be notable to begin with, but if it is a hoax (as it appears), it ought to be speedy deleted under CSD G3.--ColonelHenry (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - even if it is not a hoax (the World Christian Encyclopedia reference seems to be genuine), this is almost entirely original research. StAnselm (talk) 20:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)