Talk:Bachi Karkaria: Difference between revisions
m Resp to sus maven |
Raising a few Qs about the real sustainability of WiPe |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Yeah, its not only about well researched Articles but also about well informed Talk and about better layout on all pages (particularly some user pages) :P [[User:VivekM|VivekM]] ([[User talk:VivekM|talk]]) 13:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
Yeah, its not only about well researched Articles but also about well informed Talk and about better layout on all pages (particularly some user pages) :P [[User:VivekM|VivekM]] ([[User talk:VivekM|talk]]) 13:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Questions== |
|||
Would the powers that be amongst the (x raised to n)Wikipedians consider this: Whatever issues the editors and/or the bots and/or the Board or any entity have with the content of the any particular article, should come at the head of the Talk page and not in boxes heading the Article itself which uglify in so many ways so many things - to begin with, the contributions of those who have made the Article possible at all? Or is the whole army of them unwittingly slave labour for an ulteriour purpose? Or is the whole thing actually only and merely a gargantuan Sandbox primarily for all the ungrown people of the world - of whatever age? What I mean is: nothing seems to have changed. Oh, and Mr. Wales, please, next time you are addressing Wikipedians (in India at least) please do not waste half their time with your passport problems. Other people around the world also experience them from time to time - no one usually takes to the Podium with them. PS: I'm sending this off in a hurry so it is not reviewed or edited by me, so basically i disclaim everything i've just said but I do state what I feel. Rgds All. [[User:VivekM|VivekM]] ([[User talk:VivekM|talk]]) 13:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:51, 4 February 2014
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Hang on
Bachi Karkaria is a very senior and well known columnist in India's largest newspaper. She brings with her years of experience and there must be a wiki page on her.
Conflict of interest suspected
This Article has been substantially created by one person, who has not contributed anywhere else to WP --Greenmaven (talk) 07:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
So? Keep suspecting if you so please. I'm hereby thanking the gentle-souled person to whom credit is due for creating it. PS: Ok, so we know from your UP and the belles and wit-salles on it as to what time it is now at where you live at, but is that not only half the info - and why so, pray? Rgds ... 117.194.71.76 (talk) 13:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, its not only about well researched Articles but also about well informed Talk and about better layout on all pages (particularly some user pages) :P VivekM (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Questions
Would the powers that be amongst the (x raised to n)Wikipedians consider this: Whatever issues the editors and/or the bots and/or the Board or any entity have with the content of the any particular article, should come at the head of the Talk page and not in boxes heading the Article itself which uglify in so many ways so many things - to begin with, the contributions of those who have made the Article possible at all? Or is the whole army of them unwittingly slave labour for an ulteriour purpose? Or is the whole thing actually only and merely a gargantuan Sandbox primarily for all the ungrown people of the world - of whatever age? What I mean is: nothing seems to have changed. Oh, and Mr. Wales, please, next time you are addressing Wikipedians (in India at least) please do not waste half their time with your passport problems. Other people around the world also experience them from time to time - no one usually takes to the Podium with them. PS: I'm sending this off in a hurry so it is not reviewed or edited by me, so basically i disclaim everything i've just said but I do state what I feel. Rgds All. VivekM (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Mid-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors