Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Everingham Prize: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Northamerica1000|Northamerica1000]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|(talk)]]</sup> 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
*'''Merge'''/'''Redirect''' to [[International Conference on Computer Vision]] per nom and Agyle.[[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 23:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:08, 7 February 2014
- Mark Everingham Prize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was dePRODed by its author. While this prize may well be notable, there are concerns that insufficient third-party sources exist in order to comply with Wikipedia's notability criteria for stand-alone articles, and where the named recipients may not be notable according to WP:BLP, WP:LISTPEOPLE, and WP:NLIST. One solution may be merging to the main article at IEEE Computer Society. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAMI Young Researcher Award. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV, held in odd numbered years) and the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV, held in even numbered years). Fails to meet notability as a stand-alone article. Notably more awkward than with awards given at one conference consistently, but the division of the twin conferences is somewhat awkward in general. Within the articles, you could have a single paragraph explaining the award, linking to the sibling conference's Mark Everingham Prize section, and listing the awards given at that particular conference. ––Agyle (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to International Conference on Computer Vision per nom and Agyle.4meter4 (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)