Jump to content

Talk:Sweet Nothing (Calvin Harris song): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 46: Line 46:


I've taken the first step see [[User talk:Cuchullain#Move review of Sweet Nothing (song)]]. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 00:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
I've taken the first step see [[User talk:Cuchullain#Move review of Sweet Nothing (song)]]. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 00:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Reaction was not too supportive of the Move review, so I've agreed to raise a new RM instead. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 13:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


==Requested move 10 February 2014==

{{Requested move/dated|Sweet Nothing (Calvin Harris song)}}

[[:Sweet Nothing (song)]] → {{no redirect|Sweet Nothing (Calvin Harris song)}} – The discussion of the second RM above strongly suggests to me that the first would not succeed if proposed today, to the point that I think this should be tested. The possibility of a move review was raised with the closer of the first RM, but they have requested for what seem to me to be valid reasons that we go to a fresh RM instead, see above. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 13:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

===Survey===
:''Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with'' <code><nowiki>*'''Support'''</nowiki></code> ''or'' <code><nowiki>*'''Oppose'''</nowiki></code>'', then sign your comment with'' <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>''. Since [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|polling is not a substitute for discussion]], please explain your reasons, taking into account [[Wikipedia:Article titles|Wikipedia's policy on article titles]].''

*

===Discussion===
:''Any additional comments:''

Revision as of 13:24, 10 February 2014

WikiProject iconSongs Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comments

Can someone please edit this article? It's really poorly written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.178.29.242 (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. This is clearly the way to go per WP:PRECISION and WP:NCM. Discussions of potential merge should continue below. Cúchullain t/c 18:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Sweet Nothing (Calvin Harris song)Sweet Nothing (song) – This is the only song titled Sweet Nothing. 68.44.51.49 (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Yeah, but their album and song don't even have articles right now. Feel free to make them, though! 68.44.51.49 (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I realise that, and there is a view that if something doesn't have an article en.wp should pretend it doesn't exist. I personally don't share that view, others do. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • And my point was with neither references nor notability I can't see this song notable enough to have an article, let alone a discussion regarding what the article title should be. As an aside, I also opined that it could be better to disambiguate by the artist name in any event, but I don't think there is much point going through that again, now. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved, and let's refer the above move to move review. Andrewa (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Sweet Nothing (song)Sweet Nothing – The song dwarfs the film in popularity and relevance by miles. Unreal7 (talk) 13:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? That's got nothing to do with this. There is only one other article called Sweet Nothing - a stub film which lacks info. Hence why I suggsted this. Unreal7 (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move review

I've taken the first step see User talk:Cuchullain#Move review of Sweet Nothing (song). Andrewa (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction was not too supportive of the Move review, so I've agreed to raise a new RM instead. Andrewa (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 10 February 2014

Sweet Nothing (song)Sweet Nothing (Calvin Harris song) – The discussion of the second RM above strongly suggests to me that the first would not succeed if proposed today, to the point that I think this should be tested. The possibility of a move review was raised with the closer of the first RM, but they have requested for what seem to me to be valid reasons that we go to a fresh RM instead, see above. Andrewa (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments: