Critical making: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Critical Making == |
== Critical Making == |
||
=== Introduction === |
=== Introduction === |
||
The term ''critical making'' is invented to bridge the gap between creative physical and conceptual exploration. The main focus of critical making is open design, which includes digital software and hardware. Software usually refers to the Arduino integrated development environment (IDE). Hardware refers to computer, Ardruino, or any other devices that are used in critical making activities. |
The term ''critical making'' is invented to bridge the gap between creative physical and conceptual exploration. The main focus of critical making is open design, which includes digital software and hardware. Software usually refers to the [[Integrated_development_environment|Arduino integrated development environment (IDE)]]. Hardware refers to computer, Ardruino, or any other devices that are used in critical making activities. |
||
Matt Ratto advanced the concept of critical making, which stimulates that learning is influenced by the learner's participation towards creating and/or making things within the technological context. High degrees of participation will help improve the learning activities. However, critical making should not be reviewed as design, but rather as a type of practice. The quality of critical making lab is evaluated based on the physical “making” process, regardless of quality of the final material production. |
Matt Ratto advanced the concept of critical making, which stimulates that learning is influenced by the learner's participation towards creating and/or making things within the technological context. High degrees of participation will help improve the learning activities. However, critical making should not be reviewed as design, but rather as a type of practice. The quality of critical making lab is evaluated based on the physical “making” process, regardless of quality of the final material production <ref>1</ref>. |
||
Prior studies have noted the separation between critical thinking and physical “making”. Specifically, experts in technology lack the knowledge from art, and vice versa. Ratto claims that his goal is to connect the conceptual understanding of technology in social life to the materialized activities. By situating himself within the area of “design-oriented research” rather than “research-oriented research”, Ratto believes that critical making enhance the shared experience in both theoretical and practical understandings of critical socio-technical issues |
Prior studies have noted the separation between critical thinking and physical “making”. Specifically, experts in technology lack the knowledge from art, and vice versa. Ratto claims that his goal is to connect the conceptual understanding of technology in social life to the materialized activities<ref>2</ref>. By situating himself within the area of “design-oriented research” rather than “research-oriented research”<ref>3</ref>, Ratto believes that critical making enhance the shared experience in both theoretical and practical understandings of critical socio-technical issues.<ref>4</ref> |
||
=== Importance === |
=== Importance === |
||
The empirical findings in Ratto’s research provide a potential solution for what he refers as “wicked problems”. This concept refers to issues in which no consensus exists with regard to problem definition (Matt, 253). In this context, critical making is successful. It encourages participants to collaborate during the process of “making”, as what Ratto called, “a mode of engagement” (Ratto, 258). |
The empirical findings in Ratto’s research provide a potential solution for what he refers as “wicked problems”<ref>5</ref>. This concept refers to issues in which no consensus exists with regard to problem definition (Matt, 253)<ref>6</ref>. In this context, critical making is successful. It encourages participants to collaborate during the process of “making”, as what Ratto called, “a mode of engagement”<ref>7</ref> (Ratto, 258). |
||
=== Practice === |
=== Practice === |
||
By way of illustration, Ratto came up with the concept “flwr pwr” in critical making scenario, which was introduced to shows how people gain knowledge from critical making. In general, this scenario is ways to “talked” and “listened” to participants using infrared communication, displayed by a series of colored, blinking lights. Specifically, “flwr pwr” is simple electronic agents constructed from pre-assembled and coded components, including the arduino microcontroller and development environment(Ratto, 258) Arduino also includes hardware and software. The software can be installed into computers, which allow users to control the hardware (i.e colored, blinking lights) by using simple coding systems. As a result, by connecting Arduino to computer through use cable, critical making allows designers to create arts using technologies. |
By way of illustration, Ratto came up with the concept “flwr pwr” in critical making scenario, which was introduced to shows how people gain knowledge from critical making. In general, this scenario is ways to “talked” and “listened” to participants using infrared communication, displayed by a series of colored, blinking lights<ref>8</ref>. Specifically, “flwr pwr” is simple electronic agents constructed from pre-assembled and coded components, including the arduino microcontroller and development environment<ref>9</ref>(Ratto, 258) Arduino also includes hardware and software. The software can be installed into computers, which allow users to control the hardware (i.e colored, blinking lights) by using simple coding systems. As a result, by connecting Arduino to computer through use cable, critical making allows designers to create arts using technologies. |
||
=== The Future === |
=== The Future === |
||
The concept of critical making is fairly new. The popularity of its maker labs suggests the urgent of developing better open-source hardware and software, and involving larger communities of artists, designers, and engineers (Ratto, 258). It seems to have a promising future by quickly adopting the 3D printing. However, further research should be done to investigate the balancing act between technical and social scholarly expertise. Overall, Critical making allows an easy transition from technological coding to design, which may be a force to reconnect society and technology in the future. |
The concept of critical making is fairly new. The popularity of its maker labs suggests the urgent of developing better open-source hardware and software, and involving larger communities of artists, designers, and engineers <ref>10</ref>(Ratto, 258). It seems to have a promising future by quickly adopting the 3D printing. However, further research should be done to investigate the balancing act between technical and social scholarly expertise. Overall, Critical making allows an easy transition from technological coding to design, which may be a force to reconnect society and technology in the future. |
||
=== See also === |
=== See also === |
||
Revision as of 01:42, 12 February 2014
Critical Making
Introduction
The term critical making is invented to bridge the gap between creative physical and conceptual exploration. The main focus of critical making is open design, which includes digital software and hardware. Software usually refers to the Arduino integrated development environment (IDE). Hardware refers to computer, Ardruino, or any other devices that are used in critical making activities.
Matt Ratto advanced the concept of critical making, which stimulates that learning is influenced by the learner's participation towards creating and/or making things within the technological context. High degrees of participation will help improve the learning activities. However, critical making should not be reviewed as design, but rather as a type of practice. The quality of critical making lab is evaluated based on the physical “making” process, regardless of quality of the final material production [1].
Prior studies have noted the separation between critical thinking and physical “making”. Specifically, experts in technology lack the knowledge from art, and vice versa. Ratto claims that his goal is to connect the conceptual understanding of technology in social life to the materialized activities[2]. By situating himself within the area of “design-oriented research” rather than “research-oriented research”[3], Ratto believes that critical making enhance the shared experience in both theoretical and practical understandings of critical socio-technical issues.[4]
Importance
The empirical findings in Ratto’s research provide a potential solution for what he refers as “wicked problems”[5]. This concept refers to issues in which no consensus exists with regard to problem definition (Matt, 253)[6]. In this context, critical making is successful. It encourages participants to collaborate during the process of “making”, as what Ratto called, “a mode of engagement”[7] (Ratto, 258).
Practice
By way of illustration, Ratto came up with the concept “flwr pwr” in critical making scenario, which was introduced to shows how people gain knowledge from critical making. In general, this scenario is ways to “talked” and “listened” to participants using infrared communication, displayed by a series of colored, blinking lights[8]. Specifically, “flwr pwr” is simple electronic agents constructed from pre-assembled and coded components, including the arduino microcontroller and development environment[9](Ratto, 258) Arduino also includes hardware and software. The software can be installed into computers, which allow users to control the hardware (i.e colored, blinking lights) by using simple coding systems. As a result, by connecting Arduino to computer through use cable, critical making allows designers to create arts using technologies.
The Future
The concept of critical making is fairly new. The popularity of its maker labs suggests the urgent of developing better open-source hardware and software, and involving larger communities of artists, designers, and engineers [10](Ratto, 258). It seems to have a promising future by quickly adopting the 3D printing. However, further research should be done to investigate the balancing act between technical and social scholarly expertise. Overall, Critical making allows an easy transition from technological coding to design, which may be a force to reconnect society and technology in the future.
See also
Reference
External Links
- ^ Ratto, Matt. "Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life" (PDF). Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved 11 February 2014.