Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffiti Kings: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Business (FWDS) |
Jeremy112233 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts|list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Comment''' It does seem that more sources have been added since I nominated, this may have altered the eligibility status of the article. [[User:Jeremy112233|Jeremy112233]] ([[User talk:Jeremy112233|talk]]) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:16, 12 February 2014
- Graffiti Kings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing that separates this page as needed from the Darren Cullen page, which uses most of this material--making this article repetitious. At best the material should be merged into the Cullen article and this should become a redirect, unless enough sources can be found that show the company is independently notable from Cullen. Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment It does seem that more sources have been added since I nominated, this may have altered the eligibility status of the article. Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)