Morley v Morley: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tagged stub/unref |
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Unref}} |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unref|date= |
{{unref|date=February 2014}} |
||
{{Infobox court case |
{{Infobox court case |
||
| name = Morley v Morley |
| name = Morley v Morley |
||
Revision as of 17:46, 15 February 2014
 |
| Morley v Morley | |
|---|---|
| Court | Court of Chancery |
| Citation | (1678) 22 ER 817 |
| Keywords | |
| Trusts, theft, duty of care | |
Morley v Morley (1678) 22 ER 817 is an English trusts law case, concerning the duty of care owed by a trustee.
Facts
A trust fund was the victim of a robbery, and £40 of gold was taken.
Judgment
Lord Nottingham LC held that a trustee could not be liable if £40 of the trust fund's gold was robbed, so long as he otherwise performed his duties.
See also
Notes
References
External links
 | This article related to English law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |