Jump to content

User:Garyt45/sandbox1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Garyt45 (talk | contribs)
Garyt45 (talk | contribs)
Line 45: Line 45:
===Hong Kong SAR private housing===
===Hong Kong SAR private housing===
[[Hong Kong SAR]] private housing, on the other hand, has been severely limited [[supply]] due to restrictive land policy in Hong Kong SAR. To effectively utilize the land, many land acquired on the basis of redevelopment of old sites has been transformed into high-rise [[apartment]] buildings to increase the density of development. From the sales to completion (does not include the period from planning to acquiring new land for development) usually takes 2-3 years to complete, which means supply of private housing would be unable to match the [[demand]]<ref name=sanjay/>. As the Hong Kong SAR government hardly intervened in private housing market, many developers usually opt to release the units in batches to speculators (or-end users)<ref name=sanjay/>. Speculators would then mark up the prices before unloading it to potential buyers. Thus, over the cycle, the prices fluctuation amplified due to the nature of speculation <ref name=sanjay/>.
[[Hong Kong SAR]] private housing, on the other hand, has been severely limited [[supply]] due to restrictive land policy in Hong Kong SAR. To effectively utilize the land, many land acquired on the basis of redevelopment of old sites has been transformed into high-rise [[apartment]] buildings to increase the density of development. From the sales to completion (does not include the period from planning to acquiring new land for development) usually takes 2-3 years to complete, which means supply of private housing would be unable to match the [[demand]]<ref name=sanjay/>. As the Hong Kong SAR government hardly intervened in private housing market, many developers usually opt to release the units in batches to speculators (or-end users)<ref name=sanjay/>. Speculators would then mark up the prices before unloading it to potential buyers. Thus, over the cycle, the prices fluctuation amplified due to the nature of speculation <ref name=sanjay/>.

==Identification==

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

The figure provides a rough estimation of actual property price changes from the trend vales against its estimated fundamentals. As a guideline, to determine whether the property prices were “overvalued” or “undervalued”, in this case, it is assumed that the obsolete value needs to be compared to the levels which determined by the “fundamentals” <ref name=sanjay/>. In any case, anything beyond 10% at the [[peak]] was considered excessive upswing, while 5% at the [[trough]] was considered a swing <ref name=sanjay/>. In this case, the property prices in Hong Kong SAR were clearly overvalued throughout the crisis – thus suggesting excessive speculations which undermine the sustainability of the housing prices in Hong Kong SAR. The bubble collapsed towards the end of the crisis “dragged” down the whole market prices closer to its fundamental<ref name=sanjay/>.

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

On the assumption that in 1990 that Hong Kong SAR property price was [[equilibrium]] against its fundamental, thus, the figure above may provide some indication on whether there is any “overvaluation” or “undervaluation” in the property market prices. Considering by the time of peak of the crisis in second quarter of 1997, the property market has been estimated 40-45% above the values which was suggested as “fundamentals” <ref name=sanjay/>. Thus, this evidently proves the existence of property bubble in Hong Kong SAR at that period of short span.

===Relationship between Hang Seng Index and Hong Kong SAR Property Price===
[[Hang Seng Index]] rise or fall has close relationship to the current property prices movement. It fact, Hang Seng Index rose sharply throughout the 1990s prior to the [[1997 Asian Financial Crisis]], buoyant sentiment among investors. By 1994, the stock market rose substantially before halted by [[interest rate]] hike, which witnessed the market weakened from as high as 12,201 in January 1994 to as low as 6,968 in January 1995 <ref name=hk>Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy (2000)"Asian Financial Crisis: Causes and Development"</ref>. Similarly, property price in Hong Kong SAR slumped cumulatively by almost 30%, which lasted for several months as the effect of the interest rate hike taken place<ref name=hk/>. After the minor correction in stock and property prices, the stock market rebound sharply as the property prices resumed the upward trend.

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

Second quarter of 1997, however, spelt out the worst for [[Hong Kong SAR]] economy as Asian Financial turmoil taken place. Stock prices tumbled over 50% from its peak in August 1997 and reached a 3-year low of 7,909 on 12 January before gradually regaining its pace in the subsequent months. In the property market, coupled with the announcement of the government's policy in October 1997 to increase the supply of housing units, the [[interest rate]] hike resulting from Asian financial turmoil sent property prices down by 20% to 30% in the last few months. The property price crash in Hong Kong SAR affected the overall investors’ sentiment as well as weaker domestic [[consumer demand]] in the subsequent years.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 02:45, 19 February 2014

Hong Kong SAR property bubble (1991-1998)

Hong Kong SAR property bubble is a type of economic bubble that affects the Hong Kong SAR real estate sector. Hong Kong SAR property sector plays an important role in maintaining its economy sustainability as it may influence the banking sector and stock market sector. Partly due to cultural aspects, property sector also widely used as a gauge for the purpose of investment, saving and consumption by the households and corporate in Hong Kong SAR [1] [2].

Hong Kong SAR property prices have been reputed as one of the most volatile in the world, due to highly susceptible to speculation, largely blamed on the mainlanders[3]. In 1990, Hong Kong SAR property sector experienced a brief slowdown as doubts over reunification with the People’s Republic of China arise after the Tiananmen Square incident coupled with the Gulf Crisis[1]. By 1991, the real estate prices jumped almost 40%, but fell by approximately 16.2% in 1995 – due to US interest rates increase resulting higher mortgage loan interest rates in Hong Kong SAR [4]. The price trend reversed in two subsequent years as the housing prices jumped 18.9% and 20% in 1996 and 1997,respectively [4]. The property bubble burst in 1998, as the property prices slid by 50% [4]. The property prices crisis coincide with the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. At one point, analysis has estimated the property prices within Hong Kong SAR were overvalued by 40-45% of its “fundamental” levels in order to remain sustainable [4].

Background

Prior to 1990, Hong Kong SAR property sector has been bogged down by higher interest rate as well as net loss in population over uncertainties of transfer of sovereignty back to People’s Republic of China in 1997 [1]. Negative real interest rates by the early 1990s, however, saw a reversed in trend as property prices began to rise[1]. The rising trend, however, interrupted in 1995 by a jump in mortgage interest rate in Hong Kong SAR due to higher interest rate in US [4](Note: Hong Kong Dollar maintained linked exchange rate with the US Dollar, thus any changes in the US monetary policy would affect Hong Kong SAR monetary policy).

By 1996, improved labour market conditions as well as steady increase in household income boasted the demand for property in Hong Kong SAR [2]. At the same time, Hong Kong SAR banks reduced lending rates as well as loosening lending conditions meant that household has access to cheaper credit than prior years. As a result, Hong Kong SAR property experienced rapid increase in prices, in which appeared to be property bubble. To curb speculation, Hong Kong SAR government introduced curbing measurements in March 1997 but did not have any major impact on property prices into mid-1997 [4].

By the third quarter of 1997, the impact of 1997 Asian financial crisis hit the property prices in Hong Kong SAR due to a widespread of panic as well as lesser confidence among its investors. Hong Kong Dollar experienced repeated speculative attacks which threatened its peg against US Dollar[2]. To defend the currency peg, Hong Kong Monetary Authority had to increase the interest rate – which directly jolted the stability of Hong Kong SAR property sector. Property prices reportedly dived 40-50%, while rental down by 20% [2]. Declining in affordability, higher interest rate, weaker consumer confidence and tightening in bank lending resulted in negative market outlook.

Property market returned to stable only by 1999, after the government of Hong Kong SAR introduced series of rescue package to return the confidence into the market [2].

Timeline

1990: Property in Hong Kong SAR on average has gone up substantially compared to 1989. Hong Kong SAR private domestic housing for all classes has up by almost 11.4% compared to 1989. Private domestic housing for class A, B & C (equivalent to area below 100m2) has gone up by 11.3% compared to 1989. On the other hand, private domestic housing for class D & E (equivalent to area below 100m2) rose 4.5% compared to 1989. Areas within Hong Kong island are generally higher than Kowloon City and New Territories. By 1990, a typical housing with an area of 100m2 within Hong Kong district on average worth HK$2.05million (U$263,000), while similar housing may worth HK$1.81million (U$232,050) in Kowloon district and HK$1.55million (U$198,718). By comparison, similar housing on average worth HK$1.10 million (U$141,025) in Hong Kong SAR district, HK$0.94 million (U$120,510) in Kowloon and HK$0.78million (U$100,000) back in 1985.

1991-1994: Property in Hong Kong SAR continued to rise over the period as the housing price continued to soar. By 1994, private domestic housing for class A, B & C (equivalent to area below 100m2) has accelerated by 85.3% compared to 1991. On the other hand, private domestic housing for class D & E (equivalent to area below 100m2) rose 157.9% compared to 1991 – reflecting changes in housing demand in Hong Kong SAR. Housing in Hong Kong island remained as the most expansive housing in Hong Kong SAR as in 1994. By 1994, a typical housing in Hong Kong island with an area of 100m2 on average may cost around HK$7.46million (U$956,410). For comparison purposes, similar housing in 1991 may worth HK$2.71million (U$347,435). Other areas in Hong Kong SAR were not spared either. In Kowloon, to own a housing with an area of 100m2, potential buyer on average have to coughed up to HK$4.73million (U$606,410) in 1994, compared to a price tag of HK$2.21million (U$283,333) in 1991. For an identical property in New Kowloon, one may expected to hefty tag of HK$6.18million (U$792,308) in 1994, up approximately 136% compared to 1991. On the other hand, housing in New Territories experienced similar housing bubble effect as the housing price on average has gone up 156% I 1994, compared to 1991. Estimated average price for housing in New Territories (with an area of 100m2) may cost about HK$5.38million (U$689,743) in 1994.

1995: Adjustment to the mortgage interest rate began to take effect as the housing prices began to slow down. By 1995, private domestic housing for class A, B & C (equivalent to area below 100m2) has declined by 6.4% compared to 1994. On the other hand, private domestic housing for class D & E (equivalent to area below 100m2) went down 10.7% compared to 1994. Housing in Hong Kong island (area of 100m2) worth around HK$6.74million (U$864,102), while Kowloon may worth at about HK$4.73million (U$606,410). Other areas like New Kowloon may worth HK$5.69million (U$729,487) while in New Territories estimated worth HK$4.79million (U$614,102) in 1995.

1996-mid 1997: This period refers to the “golden years” in Hong Kong SAR property sector, marking the peak of the housing prices bubble in Hong Kong SAR. Within a short span of 2 years, Hong Kong SAR housing has reached to an alarming, unsustainable scenario. Based on the Housing Price Index, housing for category A, B and C has gone up 51.3% in 1997 compared to 1995. On the other hand, Housing Price Index for category D and E has shot up by 63.3% in 1997 compared to 1995. At the peak of the housing bubble crisis, housing in Hong Kong SAR island (area of 100m2), on average, worth around HK$11.5million (U$1,475,410), while Kowloon may worth at about HK$7.98million (U$1,023,077). Other areas like New Kowloon may worth HK$8.47million (U$1,085,897) while in New Territories estimated worth HK$7.95million (U$1,019,500) in 1995.

Mid-1997: Hong Kong SAR property prices began to decline as the effect of 1997 Asian Financial Crisis bites in. Hang Seng Index wiped out 50% of its value in August 1997 – resulted a wide mass panic over Hong Kong SAR economy. Housing in Category A, B and C began to enter correction although the impact, at this moment, remained minimal on housing in Category D and E. Anti-speculation by Hong Kong SAR government as well as hike in interest rate by October 1997 sent the Hong Kong SAR housing prices to tumble.

1998: Hang Seng Index dropped down further to as low as 7,909.1 on January 12, 1998. Hong Kong SAR property prices crashed by the first quarter of 1998 and the crisis aftermath brought down the Hong Kong SAR property back to the 1993 level. For instance, housing prices Hong Kong island with an area of 100m2 worth around HK$6.5million, comparable to the price tag set in 1993. Housing prices in other districts such as New Kowloon and New Territories was estimated to worth about HK$5.1million and HK$4.5million, respectively which was substantially lower than 1993 level. Kowloon with a price tag of HK$5.6million for 100 m housing, was the lowest level since 1994. The whole housing prices crisis lasted up to 2004.

Hong Kong SAR real estate sector

Hong Kong SAR real estate industry has been an important sector to its economy, but yet drew criticisms due to the structure of the whole real estate industry. It fact, the entire real estate sector has been dominated by a small number of firms which has stronger influence on the direction of property prices in Hong Kong SAR. At one point, the Consumer Council [5] has pinpointed the nature of existence of oligopolistic behaviour among the property developers has driven up the property prices. Hong Kong SAR real estate sector are effectively dominated by a few firms due to barriers to entry, given that the cost of acquiring of land and resources needed is higher, as well as higher financial costs and restrictions on tendering procedures to holders of land in certain districts in Hong Kong SAR (especially in New Territories).

Yet, on the other hand, there are arguments that high property prices may not be directly influenced by oligopolistic behaviour, but rather due to scarcity of land as land sale are strictly controlled by the Hong Kong SAR government [6].

Hong Kong SAR housing largely can be categorized into two different classes: public housing and private housing.

Hong Kong SAR public housing

Main article: Public housing in Hong Kong

Hong Kong SAR public housing began in 1954, with the aim to address the severe housing crisis in the island after the World War II[7]. The earlier housing policy has been focussing on mass production to tackle the housing demand (due to mass migration from the mainland) though later the policy began to focus more on its quality. Nevertheless, from as high as 75% of population lives in public rental housing has now dwindled down to around 35% [7]. The public housing in Hong Kong SAR has been longed criticized for long waiting periods has pushed up the private rental housing, while low public rental combined with higher affluence enable as many as 13% of tenants (as in 1995) to own a private property in Hong Kong SAR [1]. Public housing has continuously provide higher supply to the market compared to the private sector as in the peak of bubble crisis, public housing stock has exceeding 2 million units to fulfil demands in the market [7].

Hong Kong SAR private housing

Hong Kong SAR private housing, on the other hand, has been severely limited supply due to restrictive land policy in Hong Kong SAR. To effectively utilize the land, many land acquired on the basis of redevelopment of old sites has been transformed into high-rise apartment buildings to increase the density of development. From the sales to completion (does not include the period from planning to acquiring new land for development) usually takes 2-3 years to complete, which means supply of private housing would be unable to match the demand[1]. As the Hong Kong SAR government hardly intervened in private housing market, many developers usually opt to release the units in batches to speculators (or-end users)[1]. Speculators would then mark up the prices before unloading it to potential buyers. Thus, over the cycle, the prices fluctuation amplified due to the nature of speculation [1].

Identification

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

The figure provides a rough estimation of actual property price changes from the trend vales against its estimated fundamentals. As a guideline, to determine whether the property prices were “overvalued” or “undervalued”, in this case, it is assumed that the obsolete value needs to be compared to the levels which determined by the “fundamentals” [1]. In any case, anything beyond 10% at the peak was considered excessive upswing, while 5% at the trough was considered a swing [1]. In this case, the property prices in Hong Kong SAR were clearly overvalued throughout the crisis – thus suggesting excessive speculations which undermine the sustainability of the housing prices in Hong Kong SAR. The bubble collapsed towards the end of the crisis “dragged” down the whole market prices closer to its fundamental[1].

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

On the assumption that in 1990 that Hong Kong SAR property price was equilibrium against its fundamental, thus, the figure above may provide some indication on whether there is any “overvaluation” or “undervaluation” in the property market prices. Considering by the time of peak of the crisis in second quarter of 1997, the property market has been estimated 40-45% above the values which was suggested as “fundamentals” [1]. Thus, this evidently proves the existence of property bubble in Hong Kong SAR at that period of short span.

Relationship between Hang Seng Index and Hong Kong SAR Property Price

Hang Seng Index rise or fall has close relationship to the current property prices movement. It fact, Hang Seng Index rose sharply throughout the 1990s prior to the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, buoyant sentiment among investors. By 1994, the stock market rose substantially before halted by interest rate hike, which witnessed the market weakened from as high as 12,201 in January 1994 to as low as 6,968 in January 1995 [8]. Similarly, property price in Hong Kong SAR slumped cumulatively by almost 30%, which lasted for several months as the effect of the interest rate hike taken place[8]. After the minor correction in stock and property prices, the stock market rebound sharply as the property prices resumed the upward trend.

<<錯誤404:在此處插入圖>>

Second quarter of 1997, however, spelt out the worst for Hong Kong SAR economy as Asian Financial turmoil taken place. Stock prices tumbled over 50% from its peak in August 1997 and reached a 3-year low of 7,909 on 12 January before gradually regaining its pace in the subsequent months. In the property market, coupled with the announcement of the government's policy in October 1997 to increase the supply of housing units, the interest rate hike resulting from Asian financial turmoil sent property prices down by 20% to 30% in the last few months. The property price crash in Hong Kong SAR affected the overall investors’ sentiment as well as weaker domestic consumer demand in the subsequent years.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Sanjay, K., Dubravko, M., and Christoph, D. (2000), “Property prices and speculative bubbles: Evidence from Hong Kong SAR,” IMF Working paper, Asia and Pacific Department
  2. ^ a b c d e Hong Kong SAR Monetary Authority (2002), “What Drives Property Prices in Hong Kong SAR?” Quarterly Bulletin, 香港金融管, 8/2002)
  3. ^ Abraham, J.M. and P.H. Henderschott (1996, "Bubbles in Metropolitan Housing Market," Journal of Housing Research
  4. ^ a b c d e f Chan, H. L., Lee, S. K., Woo, K. Y. (2001), “Detecting rational bubbles in the residential housing markets in Hong Kong SAR,” Economic Modeling 18, 61-73)
  5. ^ Consumer Council (1996), “How Competitive is the Private Residential Property Market?" Consumer Council: Hong Kong SAR)
  6. ^ Enright, Michael J., Edith E. Scott, and David Dodwell (1997)," The Hong Kong SAR Advantage" (Hong Kong SAR: Oxford University Press)
  7. ^ a b c Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR SAR, People’s Republic of China (1995), “Hong Kong SAR Monthly Digest of Statistics”
  8. ^ a b Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy (2000)"Asian Financial Crisis: Causes and Development"