Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Chameleon '92: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Jorgath - "→Operation Chameleon '92: del" |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
*'''Delete.''' I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by [[Siege of Sarajevo]] and that's clearly the superior article. |
*'''Delete.''' I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by [[Siege of Sarajevo]] and that's clearly the superior article. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jorgath|Jorgath]] ([[User talk:Jorgath|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jorgath|contribs]]) 17:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 17:08, 19 February 2014
- Operation Chameleon '92 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any real notability within the context of the Siege of Sarajevo and the Bosnian War. There aren't any real results for Operation Chameleon '92 on Google Books, which leads me to believe that a deletion (or merger with Siege of Sarajevo) is best. 23 editor (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by Siege of Sarajevo and that's clearly the superior article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorgath (talk • contribs) 17:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)