Talk:Jews and the slave trade: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Jews and the slave trade/Archive 1) (bot |
Removed anti-Semitic nonsense |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Where is the source for this leap in logic? It smacks of historic revisionism - "Since they were expelled, they had no other choice but to engage in slave trading." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.210.129.152|70.210.129.152]] ([[User talk:70.210.129.152|talk]]) 00:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Where is the source for this leap in logic? It smacks of historic revisionism - "Since they were expelled, they had no other choice but to engage in slave trading." <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.210.129.152|70.210.129.152]] ([[User talk:70.210.129.152|talk]]) 00:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:It looks like sources 34 and 35 in the article support it. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 20:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC) |
:It looks like sources 34 and 35 in the article support it. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 20:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Ottoman Empire == |
|||
I stumbled upon [http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~yaronbn/No.26.pdf this interesting paper] regarding the common Ottoman Jewish practice of keeping Slavic women as sex slaves. I was surprised neither this article nor [[Slavery in the Ottoman Empire]] nor [[Concubinage]] mentioned this subject. I don't have the time to do it now, but this practice ought to be noted in this article. [[User:Dmcw127|Dmcw127]] ([[User talk:Dmcw127|talk]]) 00:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Reads Like an Opinion Piece == |
|||
Tons of assertions, loaded language, etc. This article reads nothing like an encyclopedic article. [[Special:Contributions/151.52.95.171|151.52.95.171]] ([[User talk:151.52.95.171|talk]]) 11:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== £20 million buyout by British Government == |
|||
Suggested edit: It was the slaveowners who were bought out, not the slaves. |
|||
Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Brmcgne|Brmcgne]] ([[User talk:Brmcgne|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Brmcgne|contribs]]) 14:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 06:11, 20 February 2014
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Citation needed
In an article this hotly disputed, this well patrolled and this well sourced; how does this line remain?
Later scholars would challenge Raphael's assessment of the extent of Jewish participation in the slave-trade.[citation needed]
If it can't be sourced within a week then it should be removed. 97.85.168.22 (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- We can do better than citing "later scholars", we can give a cited retraction from the original author. --GRuban (talk) 16:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
"During the 1490s, trade with the New World began to open up. At the same time, the monarchies of Spain and Portugal expelled all of their Jewish subjects. As a result, Jews began participating in all sorts of trade on the Atlantic, including the slave trade."
Where is the source for this leap in logic? It smacks of historic revisionism - "Since they were expelled, they had no other choice but to engage in slave trading." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.210.129.152 (talk) 00:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- It looks like sources 34 and 35 in the article support it. Jayjg (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Low-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- NA-Class Discrimination articles
- NA-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- NA-Class Human rights articles
- NA-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- NA-Class sociology articles
- NA-importance sociology articles