Jump to content

Talk:Charles Frederick Worth: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Edmund Patrick moved page Talk:Charles Worth to Talk:Charles Frederick Worth over redirect: revert needs to be discussed first and proposed then discussed
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
|importance=top
|importance=top
}}
}}


==Requested move 25 February 2014==

{{Requested move/dated|Charles Frederick Worth}}

[[:Charles Frederick Worth]] → {{no redirect|Charles Frederick Worth}} – This is a move back to the original title which was moved with no prior discussion on original talk page or this one. His House is called the "House of Worth" and he has always been know as Charles Fredrick Worth see [http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/wrth/hd_wrth.htm] for example and [http://www.angelpig.net/victorian/worth.html]to see how other non museum sites also call him by his full name. [http://www.apparelsearch.com/Definitions/Fashion/Designers/Charles_Frederick_Worth.htm] shows how the fashion industry and archives also use his full name. [http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/html_En/04/b2003/hm4_1y.html] shows how he is listed in other museums and [http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Charles_Frederick_Worth.aspx] and [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/649245/Charles-Frederick-Worth]encyclopedias. To facilitate ease of searching there could be (in fact should have been) a Charles Worth redirect to Charles Frederick Worth. [[User:Edmund Patrick|Edmund Patrick]] &ndash;<small> [[User talk:Edmund Patrick|'''confer''']]</small> 12:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

===Survey===
:''Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with'' <code><nowiki>*'''Support'''</nowiki></code> ''or'' <code><nowiki>*'''Oppose'''</nowiki></code>'', then sign your comment with'' <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>''. Since [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|polling is not a substitute for discussion]], please explain your reasons, taking into account [[Wikipedia:Article titles|Wikipedia's policy on article titles]].''

*

===Discussion===
:''Any additional comments:''

Revision as of 12:25, 25 February 2014

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFashion Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.


Requested move 25 February 2014

Charles Frederick WorthCharles Frederick Worth – This is a move back to the original title which was moved with no prior discussion on original talk page or this one. His House is called the "House of Worth" and he has always been know as Charles Fredrick Worth see [1] for example and [2]to see how other non museum sites also call him by his full name. [3] shows how the fashion industry and archives also use his full name. [4] shows how he is listed in other museums and [5] and [6]encyclopedias. To facilitate ease of searching there could be (in fact should have been) a Charles Worth redirect to Charles Frederick Worth. Edmund Patrick confer 12:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments: