Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of version-control software: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Explanation of terms: thanks for the info
Lam (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:


2) Add others RCS like [[Rational ClearCase]] and [[Visual Source Safe]] (see below, Open Souce )
2) Add others RCS like [[Rational ClearCase]] and [[Visual Source Safe]] (see below, Open Souce )

3) And I'd like to see if any of those can convert character sets on-the-fly (not file names, which CVSNT does, but file contents). None of the presented features are of any interest to me ;) --[[User:Lam|Lam]] 09:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


==Open source==
==Open source==

Revision as of 09:19, 21 June 2006

Requests

I guess many improvements could be apply here:

1) Add others features like in following links: berlios comparison, bitkeeper Vs subversion and Wine Hacking Tips

2) Add others RCS like Rational ClearCase and Visual Source Safe (see below, Open Souce )

3) And I'd like to see if any of those can convert character sets on-the-fly (not file names, which CVSNT does, but file contents). None of the presented features are of any interest to me ;) --Lam 09:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Open source

Is this open-source only listing? If so, its title should be changed. If not, I'm going to add our product, Code Co-op to the list. -- Bartosz 19:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not intended to be open-source only, although I'd prefer to only have notable projects so that the article doesn't get cluttered. You are welcome to add your product, but I might add more columns later, so help keeping the entry up to date would be appreciated.
If your product has any outstanding features that you think distinguish it from other systems, feel free to add columns for those. Of course, all the information should be presented in a neutral and verifiable way. Wmahan. 20:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of terms

What is namespace revision IDs? -- Bartosz 19:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I borrowed the terminology from [1]. Basically I was trying to indicate how a user refers to particular revision. By namespace I mean that the system uses a filename and maybe a simple version number. Other systems use hex values representing hashes of a file's contents. I realize that the concept is a little unclear as currently presented, and I'm open to suggestions. Wmahan. 20:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC

)

The table has subversion listed as using snapshots for the history model. That's a common misconception; while svn presents the history to the user as a list of snapshots, the change is actually stored internally as a changeset. If a repository uses the fsfs backend, you can see the individual changesets in db/revs/nnn.

OK. I'm not sure whether that column represents a useful distinction. I was trying to show that systems can use very different ways of storing revisions internally. But to be honest, I'm not sure I understand each system well enough to come up with an accurate comparison in this area. Maybe I should just remove that column. Wmahan. 05:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]