User talk:C1776M: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:C1776M/Archive 1. (BOT) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Thanks and best regards to you. |
Thanks and best regards to you. |
||
-scaniaman188 :) |
-scaniaman188 :) |
||
==Re: Recent edit to [[Nikola Tesla]]== |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I have reverted your edit. The List "Electromechanical devices and principles developed by Nikola Tesla:" was removed from the article "Nikola Tesla" (starting with comments by me[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Archive_4#Electromechanical_devices_and_principles] 19 months ago) because it was fundamentally un-encyclopedic. It made implied claims these were Tesla inventions, it did not conform to [[WP:LIST]] (must be articles), and it contained material that was unreferenced or referenced to primary sources. Not sourcing or sourcing to 100 year old primary sources ''is'' a valid reason for removal. This list was ''trimmed'' by me to conform it to WP:LIST and basic WP:V[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nikola_Tesla&diff=508659400&oldid=508619550], remainder moved to the info box by another editor[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nikola_Tesla&diff=513295144&oldid=513291225], and then trimmed again to conform the info box to guidelines. I see no reason to take the article backwards after 19 months consensus edits. I will note the removal on the article talk page. Feel free to supply versions/encyclopedic rational/reliable sources for such a list if you think it is still necessary. Thank you! [[User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|Fountains of Bryn Mawr]] ([[User talk:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|talk]]) 20:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:29, 28 March 2014
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
This is C1776M's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
Article policies
|
Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 4 days |
This user is a member of the United States Armed Forces and may be away from Wikipedia for long periods of time, but will most likely return. Emails sent to this user and messages left on this user's talk page may not be replied to for a while. |
Hello!
It's just that I have the same name of the painter! I'm creating english pages for the articles in it.wiki i created. Anyway, thank you for the thoughtfulness!--Carlomartini86(Knock-Knock) 21:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- It's just a very common name... :)--Carlomartini86(Knock-Knock) 22:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Please You Do It
For page [[1]]Please mark appropriately that the term "Black" is "inappropriate" Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.146.203.220 (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
YO
HOMOPHOBIA ISN'T NEUTRAL WHILE ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL IS SO...
Linear equations
Thanks for the fix. Was trying to get rid of the vandalism and I think I reverted to the wrong entry. Frobags (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Frobags
Trouted
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE dick
- Thanks! C1776MTalk 14:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Editing
I did not undertake disruptive editing to the shown pages. My Wikipedia account was hacked by a server user which has now been sorted out, and in addition to this I am a new user to Wikipedia.
Furthermore, I found your E-Mail specifically threatening and harmful to me, so therefore would like no further editing related articles to do with your user page. I would class your message as abusive.
-scaniaman188
- I've replied on your talk page. Thanks! C1776MTalk 14:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism?
Why did u reverted my edition here (http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=2014_Crimean_crisis&diff=601548871&oldid=601547279)? Can you explain that? 46.71.4.197 (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for explanation and good luck. 46.71.4.197 (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Mesenteric Ischemia
To Whom it May Concern:
I am unclear as to why you have deleted my edits to the mesenteric ischemia article. Are you a physician? I am a physician at Columbia University, and the old information in the mesenteric ischemia article was factually incorrect; it pertained to a different topic--ischemic colitis--which has its own Wikipedia entry. If you, as a medical professional, have disagreements, I am happy to discuss them; if not, I ask that you respect my edits because they are indeed correct.
-JS— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.117.223 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 28 March 2014
- Your edits may very well be correct, but personal knowledge is not a verifiable, reliable source. Feel free to make your edits and properly cite independent, secondary sources. —Josh3580talk/hist 04:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
Hello, C1776M, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Tentinator 06:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks
Hi again, thanks for your message; appreciate that. The hacking issue has been sorted out now, so hopefully won't happen again! I see your in the Armed Forces, I am too. I'm in the ATC in the United Kingdom Royal Air Force. Don't spend too much time on Wikipedia because of this!
Thanks and best regards to you. -scaniaman188 :)
Re: Recent edit to Nikola Tesla
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I have reverted your edit. The List "Electromechanical devices and principles developed by Nikola Tesla:" was removed from the article "Nikola Tesla" (starting with comments by me[2] 19 months ago) because it was fundamentally un-encyclopedic. It made implied claims these were Tesla inventions, it did not conform to WP:LIST (must be articles), and it contained material that was unreferenced or referenced to primary sources. Not sourcing or sourcing to 100 year old primary sources is a valid reason for removal. This list was trimmed by me to conform it to WP:LIST and basic WP:V[3], remainder moved to the info box by another editor[4], and then trimmed again to conform the info box to guidelines. I see no reason to take the article backwards after 19 months consensus edits. I will note the removal on the article talk page. Feel free to supply versions/encyclopedic rational/reliable sources for such a list if you think it is still necessary. Thank you! Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)