Talk:Language proficiency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:58, 2 April 2014

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Unassessed

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

other language and countries

it seems like there is only language proficiency in United States (ironic)

Still working on this. Hoping to be done by 3.30 UTC.samwaltz 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In civil aviation

Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (Language Proficiency Endorsement) that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proficiency tests

Based on which criteria were the named "Proficiency tests" selected? Amount of native speaker population? Random addition? ... I think in all fairness there should be a certain "selective bias" exerted here, i.e. one might even "rank" the mentioned tests after one or the other criteria, as mentioned above. I say all this because, firstly Wikipedia is about relevance and secondly I truly believe that whatever Wikipedia serves to readers might - in some cases - lead them (learners) to pick up a certain language or not.. --Philipp Grunwald (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding picture

How do you think I can add this picture in the article? File:Proficiency.PNG Gudach (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:FILE. But I do not understand clearly what the image means. And where did it come from?--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Education}}
 {{WikiProject Linguistics|applied=Yes|applied-importance=|class=|importance=}}
+== other language and countries==
+it seems like there is only language proficiency in United States (ironic)
 Still working on this. Hoping to be done by 3.30 UTC.[[User:Samwaltz|samwaltz]] 01:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)