Talk:Amphisbaenia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→New map request: new section |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/04/01/amphisbaenians-and-origins-of-mammals/ [[Special:Contributions/74.109.193.163|74.109.193.163]] ([[User talk:74.109.193.163|talk]]) 19:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/04/01/amphisbaenians-and-origins-of-mammals/ [[Special:Contributions/74.109.193.163|74.109.193.163]] ([[User talk:74.109.193.163|talk]]) 19:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Note the date of that article ;) [[User:Dinoguy2|MMartyniuk]] ([[User talk:Dinoguy2|talk]]) 20:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
:Note the date of that article ;) [[User:Dinoguy2|MMartyniuk]] ([[User talk:Dinoguy2|talk]]) 20:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
== New map request == |
|||
The current map is inaccurate, showing, among other things that amphisbaenas occur in Madagascar, in a different area of the Arabian Peninsula from their actual range, and missing their range in Asia Minor. The second page of [http://www.merrittgenomics.com/enwiki/static/docs/Macey,%20J.R.%20%282004%29.%20Phylogenetic%20relationships%20among%20amphisbaenian%20reptiles%20based%20on%20complete%20mitochondrial%20genomic%20sequences.%20Molecular%20Phylogenetics%20and%20Evolution.pdf| this article] contains an accurate map of Amphisbaenia distribution and I'd like to request that a new map be made for this article based on it. Note that the article has different colors for each Family within the group, and that the range of Amphisbaenia is the aggregate of those ranges. It might also be worthwhile to make a distribution map for each family to be included in the respective articles on those taxa. Cheers! [[User:Peter G Werner|Peter G Werner]] ([[User talk:Peter G Werner|talk]]) 02:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:52, 7 April 2014
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. |
 | Amphibians and Reptiles Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Legless
What about this one? Jimp 10 March 2006
- According to the Axolotl article it's not an Amphisbaenia, it's from the Amphibia class. Amphisbaenia are from the Sauropsida class, according to this article. --portugal (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
No, it's an Amphisbaenid, it's Bipes biporus. That's not a picture of an Axolotl. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Name
The article says "Their name is derived from Amphisbaena, a mythical serpent with a head at each end." This may not be 100% correct - T. H. White in "The Book of Beasts" suggests that the mythical creature was an exaggerated version of this real animal. Vultur (talk) 20:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Presence
There are such animals in Portugal as well, I've seen them. --portugal (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
No Longer Squamates
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/04/01/amphisbaenians-and-origins-of-mammals/ 74.109.193.163 (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note the date of that article ;) MMartyniuk (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
New map request
The current map is inaccurate, showing, among other things that amphisbaenas occur in Madagascar, in a different area of the Arabian Peninsula from their actual range, and missing their range in Asia Minor. The second page of this article contains an accurate map of Amphisbaenia distribution and I'd like to request that a new map be made for this article based on it. Note that the article has different colors for each Family within the group, and that the range of Amphisbaenia is the aggregate of those ranges. It might also be worthwhile to make a distribution map for each family to be included in the respective articles on those taxa. Cheers! Peter G Werner (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)