User talk:Rilech: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| style="background-color--[[User:Zeality|Zeality]] 23:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC): #fff; padding: 1.3em; border: 1px solid #002bb8;" |
|||
|- |
|||
|Talk page policy: |
|||
* If you leave me a message, '''I will reply on this page'''. |
|||
* If I have left you a message, '''I will be watching your page''', I would prefer your replies there. |
|||
-Rilech |
|||
|} |
|||
__ToC__ |
__ToC__ |
||
Revision as of 04:22, 19 April 2014
Rilech, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
Hi Rilech!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |
As per WP:TALK "Stay on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article. Comments that are plainly irrelevant are subject to archival or removal.", I removed the offending section.--Asher196 (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is a common vandal based edit to the article, to add the stereotyping. The replies made and the original post is a legitimate talk page discussion and may help give reason why it isn't included in the article. Rilech (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It would legitimate if the post was about the article, not the TV show in general.--Asher196 (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with that if it weren't about the article, it shouldn't be included. But that is my disagreement with you. I DO believe he is asking why there is no discussion about it in the article. The original poster, obviously has no clue what Wikipedia's policies are on what belongs and what doesn't belong in an article and why the stereotyping wouldn't be in the article. Rilech (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know the intent of the editor, only what I read. I still don't see any reference to the article in his post. It's just a general rant about the show. I disagree with leaving the section on the talk page, but I won't continue to fight it.--Asher196 (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with that if it weren't about the article, it shouldn't be included. But that is my disagreement with you. I DO believe he is asking why there is no discussion about it in the article. The original poster, obviously has no clue what Wikipedia's policies are on what belongs and what doesn't belong in an article and why the stereotyping wouldn't be in the article. Rilech (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- It would legitimate if the post was about the article, not the TV show in general.--Asher196 (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello!
I saw your comment at WT:FILM and just wanted to say hello. Always good to see feedback from editors besides the usual crowd! Hope you'll stick around, and let me know if you have any questions about the WikiProject or film articles in general. Happy editing! Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)