Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Edward Avenue (Vancouver): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
:: I don't an assumption about investment makes it notable by Wikipedia standards. --[[User:OKNoah|OKNoah]] ([[User talk:OKNoah|talk]]) 04:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
:: I don't an assumption about investment makes it notable by Wikipedia standards. --[[User:OKNoah|OKNoah]] ([[User talk:OKNoah|talk]]) 04:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
:: [[WP:NOTINHERITED|Notability is not inherited]] from the SkyTrain station, either from its location or its naming (people who have ships named after them, for instance, do ''not'' become notable for that). - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 21:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
:: [[WP:NOTINHERITED|Notability is not inherited]] from the SkyTrain station, either from its location or its naming (people who have ships named after them, for instance, do ''not'' become notable for that). - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 21:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
:::It would be impossible for there not to be extremely extensive government reports with analysis, traffic and pedestrian patterns and the impact on the area of this street by having a station on this street, thus passing even WP:GNG. There is far too much investment and civic importance for such reports not to be done.--[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 23:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/British Columbia|list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/British Columbia|list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation|list of Transportation-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Transportation|list of Transportation-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 00:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 23:23, 28 April 2014

King Edward Avenue (Vancouver) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof of notability. OKNoah (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This is a major thoroughfare in Vancouver. I believe the prevailing consensus is that major thoroughfares in major cities are notable while sidestreets are generally not (excepting for ones with substantial independant coverage). ThemFromSpace 16:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any special exceptions for streets in Wikipedia:Notability --OKNoah (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Numbered highways in national or state/provincial systems are what are considered notable. Simple streets pass GNG or die. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't an assumption about investment makes it notable by Wikipedia standards. --OKNoah (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherited from the SkyTrain station, either from its location or its naming (people who have ships named after them, for instance, do not become notable for that). - The Bushranger One ping only 21:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It would be impossible for there not to be extremely extensive government reports with analysis, traffic and pedestrian patterns and the impact on the area of this street by having a station on this street, thus passing even WP:GNG. There is far too much investment and civic importance for such reports not to be done.--Oakshade (talk) 23:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]