Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Junohk

Junohk

Junohk (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Junohk/Archive.

21 April 2014

– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Chadlesch (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

This issue has been dealt and explained by the Wiki admin already. Chadlesch (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is a friend of mine from the same university. This content created by Oda Mari is to disregard other user's contributions to wiki article.

Oda Mari has been noticed by many for the user's skeptical/nationalist view on East Asian history. (i.e. reverting other user's edits over 30 times on articles. For the controversy with me on Joseon article, Oda Mari reverted 4 times without any clarification.)

This is a clear personal vandalization

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Since the end of Nov. last year, many newbies and IPs came and removed a sourced material in the infobox of the article Joseon. Recently, Junohk repeatedly removed it without edit summary. After his/her 3 removals on April 18, the newbie Chadlesch jumped in the article, supporting Junohk's removal. [1] I was a bit surprised because it was shortly after my restore. Then came Junohk soon again with his/her first edit summary. [2] After Junohk's self revert [3], Chadlesch came and removed the material [4] and after that, s/he first commented on the talkpage. [5] Probably because I refrain from restoring the material, Chadlesch stopped editing WP. Oda Mari (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Please take a look at this SPI too. Oda Mari (talk) 10:24, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Clerk note: Don't have the time to investigate right now, but one of these people is part of Education Program:University of Toronto/INF-KMD Knowledge, Media, Culture and Society (SP14) -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 12:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Declined These are both obviously students from a university program, and their writing tone on talk pages is quite different. Insufficient basis to checkuser, especially as there is a good chance they'll resolve to an institutional IP. Instead, resolve the central dispute. As the term is over, there's good chance that neither account will continue. Risker (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

---