Anarchism: Difference between revisions
Warren property, etc. |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] is commonly regarded as the first self-proclaimed anarchist, a label he adopted in his groundbreaking work ''[[What is Property?]]'', published in 1840. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory.<ref> Daniel Guerin, ''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice'' (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970).</ref> Proudhon developed the theory of [[spontaneous order]] in society, where organization emerges without a central coordinator imposing its own idea of order against the wills of individuals acting in their own interests; his famous quote on the matter is, "Liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order." In ''What is Property?'' Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "[[Property is theft]]." In this work he opposed the institution of decreed "property" (propriété), where owners have complete rights to "use and abuse" their property as they wish.<ref name="proudhon-prop">[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon|Proudhon]], Pierre-Joseph. ''"[http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch03.htm Chapter 3. Labour as the efficient cause of the domain of property]"'' from ''"[[What is Property?]]"'', 1840</ref> He contrasted this with what he called 'possession' - limited ownership of resources and goods only while in more or less continuous use. About this latter type of property, Proudhon wrote "Property is Liberty," and argued that it was a bulwark against state power.<ref>Edwards, Stewart. Introduction to ''Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon'', Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc. 1969, p. 33</ref> |
[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] is commonly regarded as the first self-proclaimed anarchist, a label he adopted in his groundbreaking work ''[[What is Property?]]'', published in 1840. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory.<ref> Daniel Guerin, ''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice'' (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970).</ref> Proudhon developed the theory of [[spontaneous order]] in society, where organization emerges without a central coordinator imposing its own idea of order against the wills of individuals acting in their own interests; his famous quote on the matter is, "Liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order." In ''What is Property?'' Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "[[Property is theft]]." In this work he opposed the institution of decreed "property" (propriété), where owners have complete rights to "use and abuse" their property as they wish.<ref name="proudhon-prop">[[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon|Proudhon]], Pierre-Joseph. ''"[http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch03.htm Chapter 3. Labour as the efficient cause of the domain of property]"'' from ''"[[What is Property?]]"'', 1840</ref> He contrasted this with what he called 'possession' - limited ownership of resources and goods only while in more or less continuous use. About this latter type of property, Proudhon wrote "Property is Liberty," and argued that it was a bulwark against state power.<ref>Edwards, Stewart. Introduction to ''Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon'', Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc. 1969, p. 33</ref> |
||
[[Image:Pierre_Joseph_Proudhon.jpg|110px|thumb|left|Pierre Joseph Proudhon]] |
[[Image:Pierre_Joseph_Proudhon.jpg|110px|thumb|left|Pierre Joseph Proudhon]] |
||
His opposition to statist capitalism, the state, and organised religion inspired subsequent anarchists and made him one of the leading socialist thinkers of his time. For Proudhon: |
His opposition to statist capitalism, the state, and organised religion inspired subsequent anarchists and made him one of the leading socialist thinkers of his time. For Proudhon: |
||
::''"The economic idea of capitalism, the politics of government or of authority, and the theological idea of the Church are three identical ideas, linked in various ways. To attack one of them is equivalent to attacking all of them . . . What capital does to labour, and the State to liberty, the Church does to the spirit. This trinity of absolutism is as baneful in practice as it is in philosophy. The most effective means for oppressing the people would be simultaneously to enslave its body, its will and its reason."'' <ref>quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 43-44</ref> |
::''"The economic idea of capitalism, the politics of government or of authority, and the theological idea of the Church are three identical ideas, linked in various ways. To attack one of them is equivalent to attacking all of them . . . What capital does to labour, and the State to liberty, the Church does to the spirit. This trinity of absolutism is as baneful in practice as it is in philosophy. The most effective means for oppressing the people would be simultaneously to enslave its body, its will and its reason."'' <ref>quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 43-44</ref> |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
[[Image:PeterKropotkin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Peter Kropotkin]] |
[[Image:PeterKropotkin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Peter Kropotkin]] |
||
Whereas Proudhon disliked the collective aspects of [[communism]],[http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch05.htm] Bakunin was originally sympathetic to it, translating the [[Communist Manifesto]] into [[Russian language|Russian]]. Bakunin was to repudiate communism, however, which he associated with statism, |
Whereas Proudhon disliked the collective aspects of [[communism]],[http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/ch05.htm] Bakunin was originally sympathetic to it, translating the [[Communist Manifesto]] into [[Russian language|Russian]]. Bakunin was to repudiate communism, however, which he associated with statism, for a form of [[collectivist anarchism]]. The collectivist anarchists advocated remuneration for labor but held out the possibility of a post-revolutionary transition to a communist system of distribution according to need. Bakunin's associate, [[James Guillaume]], put it this way in his essay, ''[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/guillaume/works/ideas.htm Ideas on Social Organization]''(1876): "When… production comes to outstrip consumption… [e]veryone will draw what he needs from the abundant social reserve of commodities, without fear of depletion; and the moral sentiment which will be more highly developed among free and equal workers will prevent, or greatly reduce, abuse and waste." |
||
An early anarchist communist was [[Joseph Déjacque]], the first person to describe himself as "[[libertarian socialism|libertarian]]".<ref>[http://joseph.dejacque.free.fr/ecrits/lettreapjp.htm De l'être-humain mâle et femelle - Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque] (in [[French language|French]])</ref> Unlike Proudhon, he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature."[http://www.blackrosebooks.net/anarism1.htm] |
An early anarchist communist was [[Joseph Déjacque]], the first person to describe himself as "[[libertarian socialism|libertarian]]".<ref>[http://joseph.dejacque.free.fr/ecrits/lettreapjp.htm De l'être-humain mâle et femelle - Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque] (in [[French language|French]])</ref> Unlike Proudhon, he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature."[http://www.blackrosebooks.net/anarism1.htm] |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
[[Image:BenjaminTucker.jpg|thumb|150px|left|[[Benjamin Tucker]]]] |
[[Image:BenjaminTucker.jpg|thumb|150px|left|[[Benjamin Tucker]]]] |
||
In 1825 [[Josiah Warren]] had participated in a [[communitarian]] experiment headed by [[Robert Owen]] called [[New Harmony]], which failed in a few years amidst much internal conflict. Warren blamed the community's failure on a lack of [[individual sovereignty]].<ref name="warrenindividualism">In 1827, as New Harmony disintegrated, he returned to Cincinnati. Of all the colonists, he was the only one, at least in a leading position, who seems to have learned anything. Most of them, like Frances Wright, were doomed to repeat the same mistakes and follies and end in the same disasters. Almost all critics of New Harmony have said that what it lacked was strong leadership, discipline, and commitment — strong government. Warren came to exactly the opposite conclusion. New Harmony had suffered from the disorderly exercise of freedom and the instability of Owen’s authority. On the principle of like cures like, he was convinced that the basis of all future reform must be complete individual liberty. “Man seeks freedom as the magnet seeks the pole or water its level,” he wrote, “and society can have no peace until every member is really free.” But such a condition was not realizable under the existing organization and ideas of society. New views had to replace those of the past. For the future society new principles were needed. The first of these was “individual individuality.” The sovereignty of every individual at all times had to be held inviolable. Everyone necessarily was free to dispose of his person, his time, his property, and his reputation as he pleased — but always at his own cost. - Kenneth Rexroth, Communalism From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century[http://www.bopsecrets.org/rexroth/communalism6.htm#16.%20Josiah%20Warren]</ref> Warren proceeded to organise experimental anarchist communities which respected what he called "the sovereignty of the individual" at [[Utopia (anarchist community)|Utopia]] and [[Past and present anarchist communities#Modern times .281851 to late 1860.27s.29|Modern Times]]. In 1833 Warren wrote and published ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', which some have noted to be the first anarchist periodical ever published. Benjamin Tucker says that Warren "was the first man to expound and formulate the doctrine now known as Anarchism." (''Liberty'' XIV (December, 1900):1) |
In 1825 [[Josiah Warren]] had participated in a [[communitarian]] experiment headed by [[Robert Owen]] called [[New Harmony]], which failed in a few years amidst much internal conflict. Warren blamed the community's failure on a lack of [[individual sovereignty]] and a lack of private property.<ref name="warrenindividualism">In 1827, as New Harmony disintegrated, he returned to Cincinnati. Of all the colonists, he was the only one, at least in a leading position, who seems to have learned anything. Most of them, like Frances Wright, were doomed to repeat the same mistakes and follies and end in the same disasters. Almost all critics of New Harmony have said that what it lacked was strong leadership, discipline, and commitment — strong government. Warren came to exactly the opposite conclusion. New Harmony had suffered from the disorderly exercise of freedom and the instability of Owen’s authority. On the principle of like cures like, he was convinced that the basis of all future reform must be complete individual liberty. “Man seeks freedom as the magnet seeks the pole or water its level,” he wrote, “and society can have no peace until every member is really free.” But such a condition was not realizable under the existing organization and ideas of society. New views had to replace those of the past. For the future society new principles were needed. The first of these was “individual individuality.” The sovereignty of every individual at all times had to be held inviolable. Everyone necessarily was free to dispose of his person, his time, his property, and his reputation as he pleased — but always at his own cost. - Kenneth Rexroth, Communalism From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century[http://www.bopsecrets.org/rexroth/communalism6.htm#16.%20Josiah%20Warren]</ref> Warren proceeded to organise experimental anarchist communities which respected what he called "the sovereignty of the individual" at [[Utopia (anarchist community)|Utopia]] and [[Past and present anarchist communities#Modern times .281851 to late 1860.27s.29|Modern Times]]. In 1833 Warren wrote and published ''The Peaceful Revolutionist'', which some have noted to be the first anarchist periodical ever published. Benjamin Tucker says that Warren "was the first man to expound and formulate the doctrine now known as Anarchism." (''Liberty'' XIV (December, 1900):1) |
||
[[Benjamin Tucker]] became interested in anarchism through meeting Josiah Warren and [[William B. Greene]]. He edited and published ''Liberty'' from August 1881 to April 1908; it is widely considered to be the finest individualist-anarchist periodical ever issued in the English language. Tucker's conception of individualist anarchism incorporated the ideas of a variety of theorists: Greene's ideas on [[mutualism|mutual banking]]; Warren's ideas on [[cost the limit of price|cost as the limit of price]] (a [[heterodox economics|heterodox]] variety of [[labour theory of value]]); [[Proudhon]]'s market anarchism; [[Max Stirner]]'s [[egoism]]; and, [[Herbert Spencer]]'s "law of equal freedom". Tucker strongly supported the individual's right to own the product of his or her labour as "[[private property]]", and believed in a <ref name="tucker-pay">[[Benjamin Tucker|Tucker]], Benjamin. ''"[http://www.blackcrayon.com/page.jsp/library/tucker/tucker37.htm Labor and Its Pay]"'' Individual Liberty: Selections From the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker, Vanguard Press, New York, 1926, Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, NY, 1973.</ref>[[market economy]] for trading this property. However, like most anarchists, he rejected intellectual property rights as well as opposing private property in land and other natural resources in favour of "occupancy and use" |
[[Benjamin Tucker]] became interested in anarchism through meeting Josiah Warren and [[William B. Greene]]. He edited and published ''Liberty'' from August 1881 to April 1908; it is widely considered to be the finest individualist-anarchist periodical ever issued in the English language. Tucker's conception of individualist anarchism incorporated the ideas of a variety of theorists: Greene's ideas on [[mutualism|mutual banking]]; Warren's ideas on [[cost the limit of price|cost as the limit of price]] (a [[heterodox economics|heterodox]] variety of [[labour theory of value]]); [[Proudhon]]'s market anarchism; [[Max Stirner]]'s [[egoism]]; and, [[Herbert Spencer]]'s "law of equal freedom". Tucker strongly supported the individual's right to own the product of his or her labour as "[[private property]]", and believed in a <ref name="tucker-pay">[[Benjamin Tucker|Tucker]], Benjamin. ''"[http://www.blackcrayon.com/page.jsp/library/tucker/tucker37.htm Labor and Its Pay]"'' Individual Liberty: Selections From the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker, Vanguard Press, New York, 1926, Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, NY, 1973.</ref>[[market economy]] for trading this property. However, like most anarchists, he rejected intellectual property rights as well as opposing private property in land and other natural resources in favour of "occupancy and use" He argued that in a truly free market system without the state, the abundance of competition would eliminate profits, interest and rent and ensure that all workers received the full value of their labor. Many individualists (such as Tucker and Yarros) supported market-provided private defense of labour produced property and land occupied by those who used it. |
||
Other nineteenth century individualists included [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]], and [[Victor Yarros]]. |
Other nineteenth century individualists included [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]], and [[Victor Yarros]]. |
||
According to political historian Carl Levy, "Since World War II this tradition has been reborn and modified in the United States as anarcho-capitalism or libertarianism."<ref>Levy, Carl. "[http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568770/Anarchism.html Anarchism]", under the "Anarcho-individualism" heading, Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2006</ref> |
|||
==Issues in anarchism== |
==Issues in anarchism== |
||
Line 117: | Line 119: | ||
===Capitalism=== |
===Capitalism=== |
||
{{main|Anarchism and capitalism}} |
{{main|Anarchism and capitalism}} |
||
Throughout most of its history, anarchism has been defined by its proponents in opposition to [[capitalism]] - which, as they understand the term, can be maintained only by state violence. Anarchist organisations, for example the [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT]] (Spain) and the [[Anarchist Federation]] (UK), all take an explicitly anti-capitalist stance. In the 20th century a new school of thought sprung up which attempted to formulate a theory of anarchism embracing a stateless form of capitalism. This anarcho-capitalist school has met resistance from those who hold that capitalism is inherently oppressive; many anarchists and scholars don't consider |
Throughout most of its history, anarchism has been defined by its proponents in opposition to [[capitalism]] - which, as they understand the term, can be maintained only by state violence. Anarchist organisations, for example the [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT]] (Spain) and the [[Anarchist Federation]] (UK), all take an explicitly anti-capitalist stance. In the 20th century a new school of thought sprung up which attempted to formulate a theory of anarchism embracing a stateless form of capitalism. This anarcho-capitalist school has met resistance from those who hold that capitalism is inherently oppressive; many anarchists and scholars don't consider it to be "true" anarchism.<ref>Peter Marshall, '''Demanding the Impossible'''; John Clark, '''The Anarchist Moment'''; Albert Meltzer, '''Anarchism: Arguments for and Against'''; Noam Chomsky, '''Understanding Power''', David Weick, ''Anarchist Justice''; Brian Morris, ''"Anthropology and Anarchism,"'' '''Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed''' (no. 45); Peter Sabatini, ''Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy''; Donald Rooum, '''What is Anarchism?'''; Bob Black, ''Libertarian as Conservative''</ref> However, other anarchists and scholars regard anarchism as opposition to the state, and thus do consider anarcho-capitalism to be a form of anarchism.<ref>1) Perlin, Terry M. Contemporary Anarchism. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ 1979, p. 7. 2) [[Richard Sylvan|Sylvan]], Richard. ''Anarchism''. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, editors Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Blackwell Publishing, 1995, p.231.</ref> |
||
====Anarcho-capitalism==== |
====Anarcho-capitalism==== |
||
[[Image:Murray Rothbard Smile.JPG|thumb|left|150px|[[Murray Rothbard]] (1926-1995)]] |
[[Image:Murray Rothbard Smile.JPG|thumb|left|150px|[[Murray Rothbard]] (1926-1995)]] |
||
:''Main article: [[Anarcho-capitalism]]; Semantic debate: [[Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism]] |
|||
Anarcho-capitalism is a predominantly [[United States]]-based theoretical tradition that promotes an economic system of [[free market]] [[capitalism]]. In such a society no authority would prohibit anyone from providing, via the [[free market]], ''any'' service - even those services traditionally provided by state [[monopoly]] such as police, courts, and defense against invasion. Anarcho-capitalism does not oppose [[profit]], rent, interest, or employment. |
Anarcho-capitalism is a predominantly [[United States]]-based theoretical tradition that promotes an economic system of [[free market]] [[capitalism]]. In such a society no authority would prohibit anyone from providing, via the [[free market]], ''any'' service - even those services traditionally provided by state [[monopoly]] such as police, courts, and defense against invasion. Anarcho-capitalism does not oppose [[profit]], rent, interest, or employment. |
||
[[Murray Rothbard]]'s synthesis of [[classical liberalism]] and [[Austrian economics]], along with the anarchist critiques of the state, was germinal for the development of contemporary anarcho-capitalist theory. Rothbard believes that property can only legitimately ''originate'' by the application of labor to unowned resources rather than by mere claim or seizure, and that it may then only be transferred by voluntary trade or gift.<ref name=Rothbard-1962>Rothbard, Murray N. (1962) [http://www.mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2d.asp ''Man, Economy & State with Power and Market''] Ludwig von Mises Institute ISBN 0945466307 ch2 Retrieved [[19 May]] [[2005]]</ref> While Rothbard bases anarcho-capitalism on [[natural rights]], others such as [[David D. Friedman]], author of [[The Machinery of Freedom]], prefer to justify it on a utilitarian basis. Some [[minarchism|minarchists]], such as [[Ayn Rand]] and [[Robert Nozick]], have also influenced anarcho-capitalism. |
[[Murray Rothbard]]'s synthesis of [[classical liberalism]] and [[Austrian economics]], along with the anarchist critiques of the state, was germinal for the development of contemporary anarcho-capitalist theory. Rothbard believes that property can only legitimately ''originate'' by the application of labor to unowned resources rather than by mere claim or seizure, and that it may then only be transferred by voluntary trade or gift.<ref name=Rothbard-1962>Rothbard, Murray N. (1962) [http://www.mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2d.asp ''Man, Economy & State with Power and Market''] Ludwig von Mises Institute ISBN 0945466307 ch2 Retrieved [[19 May]] [[2005]]</ref> While Rothbard bases anarcho-capitalism on [[natural rights]], others such as [[David D. Friedman]], author of [[The Machinery of Freedom]], prefer to justify it on a utilitarian basis. Some [[minarchism|minarchists]], such as [[Ayn Rand]] and [[Robert Nozick]], have also influenced anarcho-capitalism. |
||
Anarcho-capitalism is typically founded on the [[Non-aggression principle]] (or NAP), which states that the initiation of violence is not permissible. Some anarcho-capitalists, such as Rothbard, accept the nonaggression principle on a [[natural law]] basis. Others take a [[consequentialist]] value-free approach per Friedman; yet others such as [[Jan Narveson]] take a contractarian approach asserting that rights can only come about by contract between self-interested parties who agree to refrain from initiating coercion against each other. |
|||
Most anarcho-capitalists believe that anarchism without stateless capitalism cannot exist, because in the absence of a state authority that would prevent it, stateless capitalism would naturally and inevitably develop in any free society. Hence, Rothbard's statement that "capitalism is the fullest expression of anarchism, and anarchism is the fullest expression of capitalism."<ref>[http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard103.html ''Exclusive Interview With Murray Rothbard''] The New Banner: A Fortnightly Libertarian Journal ([[25 February]] [[1972]])</ref> |
Most anarcho-capitalists believe that anarchism without stateless capitalism cannot exist, because in the absence of a state authority that would prevent it, stateless capitalism would naturally and inevitably develop in any free society. Hence, Rothbard's statement that "capitalism is the fullest expression of anarchism, and anarchism is the fullest expression of capitalism."<ref>[http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard103.html ''Exclusive Interview With Murray Rothbard''] The New Banner: A Fortnightly Libertarian Journal ([[25 February]] [[1972]])</ref> |
||
Line 182: | Line 186: | ||
===Other issues=== |
===Other issues=== |
||
*'''Technology''' - Recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Many people use the Internet to form on-line communities. [[Intellectual property]] is undermined and a gift-culture supported by [[file sharing|sharing music files]], collaborative software development, and [[free software]] ([[Alternative terms for free software|also called]] [[open-source software]]). These cyber-communities include the [[GNU]], [[Linux]], [[Indymedia]], and [[Wiki]]. <ref name="digitalcurrency">Some anarchist sites accepting e-gold are: http://www.strike-the-root.com/, http://www.spaz.org/~dan/individualist-anarchist/help.html "I'm trying to find stuff that is specifically individualist anarchist, not anarcho-capitalist...", and http://www.buildfreedom.com</ref Some anarchists see [[information technology]] as the best weapon to defeat authoritarianism. Some even think the information age makes eventual anarchy inevitable.<ref>[http://www.modulaware.com/a/?m=select&id=0684832720 The Sovereign Individual -- Mastering the transition to the information age]</ref> ''See also'': [[Crypto-anarchism]] and [[Cypherpunk]]. |
*'''Technology''' - Recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Many people use the Internet to form on-line communities. [[Intellectual property]] is undermined and a gift-culture supported by [[file sharing|sharing music files]], collaborative software development, and [[free software]] ([[Alternative terms for free software|also called]] [[open-source software]]). These cyber-communities include the [[GNU]], [[Linux]], [[Indymedia]], and [[Wiki]]. [[Public key cryptography]] has made anonymous digital currencies such as [[e-gold]] and [[Local Exchange Trading Systems]] an alternative to statist [[fiat money]].<ref name="digitalcurrency">Some anarchist sites accepting e-gold are: http://www.strike-the-root.com/, http://www.spaz.org/~dan/individualist-anarchist/help.html "I'm trying to find stuff that is specifically individualist anarchist, not anarcho-capitalist...", and http://www.buildfreedom.com</ref> Some anarchists see [[information technology]] as the best weapon to defeat authoritarianism. Some even think the information age makes eventual anarchy inevitable.<ref>[http://www.modulaware.com/a/?m=select&id=0684832720 The Sovereign Individual -- Mastering the transition to the information age]</ref> ''See also'': [[Crypto-anarchism]] and [[Cypherpunk]]. |
||
*'''Parliamentarianism''' - In general terms, anarchism opposes voting in elections. This is for three reasons. First, it is ineffective, at best resulting in minor reforms. Second, taking part in elections has always resulted in radicals becoming part of the system they oppose rather than ending it.<ref>[http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secJ2.html J.2 What is direct action?]</ref>. Third, because voting amounts to condoning the state.<ref>"Voting Anarchists: An Oxymoron or What?" by [[Joe Peacott]], and writings by [[Fred Woodworth]].</ref> The anarchist [[collective]] [[CrimethInc.]] around the 2004 Presidential election in the US, endorsed a campaign called, "[[Don't Just Vote, Get Active]]", which promoted the importance of [[direct action]], as opposed to electoral change, regarding social change in society. In 2006, an anarchist activist was elected to local government in Lake Worth, Florida.<ref>[http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2665/ Anarchist Cheerleader Elected: Lake Worth City Commissioner Cara Jennings refocuses her radicalism after surprise win]</ref> |
*'''Parliamentarianism''' - In general terms, anarchism opposes voting in elections. This is for three reasons. First, it is ineffective, at best resulting in minor reforms. Second, taking part in elections has always resulted in radicals becoming part of the system they oppose rather than ending it.<ref>[http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secJ2.html J.2 What is direct action?]</ref>. Third, because voting amounts to condoning the state.<ref>"Voting Anarchists: An Oxymoron or What?" by [[Joe Peacott]], and writings by [[Fred Woodworth]].</ref> The anarchist [[collective]] [[CrimethInc.]] around the 2004 Presidential election in the US, endorsed a campaign called, "[[Don't Just Vote, Get Active]]", which promoted the importance of [[direct action]], as opposed to electoral change, regarding social change in society. In 2006, an anarchist activist was elected to local government in Lake Worth, Florida.<ref>[http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2665/ Anarchist Cheerleader Elected: Lake Worth City Commissioner Cara Jennings refocuses her radicalism after surprise win]</ref> |
||
Revision as of 13:46, 27 June 2006
Anarchism is the name for both a political philosophy and manner of organizing society, derived from the Greek αναρχία ("without archons" or "without rulers"). Thus "anarchism," in its most general meaning, is the belief that all forms of rulership are undesirable and should be abolished. For many anarchists, this includes not only the state but also the institution of capitalism. The word "anarchy", as most anarchists use it, does not imply chaos, nihilism, or anomie, but rather a harmonious anti-authoritarian society that is based on voluntary association of free individuals in autonomous communities, mutual aid, and self-governance.
Origins
The word "anarchist" originated as a term of abuse. For example at the Putney Debates (1647) during the English Civil War, the Leveller, Thomas Rainsborough, remarked: "I know that some particular men we debate with believe we are for anarchy." Whilst the term is still used in a pejorative way to describe "any act that used violent means to destroy the organization of society"[1], it has also been taken up as a positive label by self-defined anarchists.
In the modern era, the first to use the term "Anarchy" to mean something other than chaos was Louis-Armand, Baron de Lahontan, in his Nouveaux voyages dans l'Amérique septentrionale (New voyages in northern America) (1703), where he described the indigenous American society, which had no state, laws, prisons, priests or private property, as being in anarchy[2].
One of the earliest known essays explicitly advocating the absence of government was "A Vindication of Natural Society" (1756) by Edmund Burke.[3] Strongly influenced by Vindication, William Godwin published An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice [2] in 1793. Although Godwin did not use the word "anarchism," many later anarchists have regarded this book as the first major anarchist text, and Godwin as the "founder of philosophical anarchism." But at this point no anarchist movement yet existed, and the term "anarchiste" was known mainly as an insult hurled by the bourgeois Girondins at more radical elements in the French Revolution.
The first self-labelled anarchist
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon is commonly regarded as the first self-proclaimed anarchist, a label he adopted in his groundbreaking work What is Property?, published in 1840. It is for this reason that some claim Proudhon as the founder of modern anarchist theory.[4] Proudhon developed the theory of spontaneous order in society, where organization emerges without a central coordinator imposing its own idea of order against the wills of individuals acting in their own interests; his famous quote on the matter is, "Liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order." In What is Property? Proudhon answers with the famous accusation "Property is theft." In this work he opposed the institution of decreed "property" (propriété), where owners have complete rights to "use and abuse" their property as they wish.[5] He contrasted this with what he called 'possession' - limited ownership of resources and goods only while in more or less continuous use. About this latter type of property, Proudhon wrote "Property is Liberty," and argued that it was a bulwark against state power.[6]
His opposition to statist capitalism, the state, and organised religion inspired subsequent anarchists and made him one of the leading socialist thinkers of his time. For Proudhon:
- "The economic idea of capitalism, the politics of government or of authority, and the theological idea of the Church are three identical ideas, linked in various ways. To attack one of them is equivalent to attacking all of them . . . What capital does to labour, and the State to liberty, the Church does to the spirit. This trinity of absolutism is as baneful in practice as it is in philosophy. The most effective means for oppressing the people would be simultaneously to enslave its body, its will and its reason." [7]
While he opposed communism and favoured remuneration for labour, he also opposed capitalist wage labour (i.e. profiting from someone else's labour). [8] He called this economic system mutualism. He urged workers "to form themselves into democratic societies, with equal conditions for all members, on pain of a relapse into feudalism." Under statist capitalism, he argued employees are "subordinated, exploited" and their "permanent condition is one of obedience," a "slave." Support for workers' management of production is shared by all schools of social anarchism.
Proudhon's ideas were influential within French working class movements, and his followers were active in the Revolution of 1848 in France as well as the Paris Commune of 1871. Anarcho-communists, such as Kropotkin, later disagreed with Proudhon for his support of "private property" in the products of labour (i.e. wages, or "remuneration for work done") rather than free distribution of the products of labour.[9] Proudhon's philosophy of property is complex and often contradictory: it was developed in a number of works over his lifetime, and there are differing interpretations of some of his ideas. For more detailed discussion see Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.
Anarchism and workers' revolution
In Europe, harsh reaction followed the revolutions of 1848. Twenty years later in 1864 the International Workingmen's Association, sometimes called the 'First International', united some diverse European revolutionary currents, including French followers of Proudhon, Blanquists, English trade unionists, socialists and social democrats. Due to its genuine links to active workers movements the International became a significant organization.
Karl Marx was a leading figure in the International and a member of its General Council. Proudhon's followers, the Mutualists, opposed Marx's state socialism, advocating political abstentionism and small property holdings. Mikhail Bakunin joined in 1868, allying with the anti-authoritarian socialist sections of the International, who advocated the revolutionary overthrow of the state and the collectivization of property. At first, the collectivists worked with the Marxists to push the First International into a more revolutionary socialist direction. Subsequently, the International became polarised into two camps, with Marx and Bakunin as their respective figureheads. The clearest difference between the camps was over strategy. The anarchist collectivists around Bakunin favoured (in Kropotkin's words) "direct economic struggle against capitalism, without interfering in the political parliamentary agitation."[3] Marx and his followers focused on parliamentary activity and the need for structured political parties with central leadership and control.
Bakunin characterised Marx's ideas as authoritarian, and predicted that if a Marxist party came to power its leaders would simply take the place of the ruling class they had fought against.[10] In 1872 the conflict climaxed with a final split between the two groups, when at the Hague Congress Marx engineered the expulsion of Bakunin and James Guillaume from the International and had its headquarters transferred to New York. In response, the anti-authoritarian sections formed their own International at the St. Imier Congress, adopting a revolutionary anarchist program.[4]
Many contemporary debates among the Left can be traced back to the debate between Bakunin and Marx over the role of revolutionary parties in the revolution and in post-revolutionary society. Many leftists, communist and anarchist, reject the traditional Leninist and Bolshevist concept of a vanguard party prepared to form a new proletarian state, in part because of the historical failures of the Soviet Union but also out of concern for the development of an aparatchik/bureaucratic class that will replace the existing ruling class with their own bureaucratic dictatorship, although the radical communists do not share the anarchists' opposition to all political power (see a 1992 interview with Joelle Aubron, former leader of the militant urban guerilla group Action Directe in France).[5]
Anarchist communism
Whereas Proudhon disliked the collective aspects of communism,[6] Bakunin was originally sympathetic to it, translating the Communist Manifesto into Russian. Bakunin was to repudiate communism, however, which he associated with statism, for a form of collectivist anarchism. The collectivist anarchists advocated remuneration for labor but held out the possibility of a post-revolutionary transition to a communist system of distribution according to need. Bakunin's associate, James Guillaume, put it this way in his essay, Ideas on Social Organization(1876): "When… production comes to outstrip consumption… [e]veryone will draw what he needs from the abundant social reserve of commodities, without fear of depletion; and the moral sentiment which will be more highly developed among free and equal workers will prevent, or greatly reduce, abuse and waste."
An early anarchist communist was Joseph Déjacque, the first person to describe himself as "libertarian".[11] Unlike Proudhon, he argued that "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature."[7]
Peter Kropotkin, often seen as the most important theorist of anarchist communism, outlined his economic ideas in The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops. Kropotkin felt co-operation to be more beneficial than competition, arguing in Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution that this was illustrated in nature. He advocated the abolition of private property through the "expropriation of the whole of social wealth" by the people themselves[12], and for the economy to be co-ordinated through a horizontal network of voluntary associations[13]. He maintained that in anarcho-communism "houses, fields, and factories will no longer be private property, and that they will belong to the commune or the nation" and money, wages, and trade would be abolished.[14] Individuals and groups would use and control whatever resources they needed as the aim of anarchist-communism was to place "the product reaped or manufactured at the disposal of all, leaving to each the liberty to consume them as he pleases in his own home." [15] Moreover, he repeatedly stressed (like other communist-anarchists) that individuals would not be forced into communism, arguing that the peasant "who is in possession of just the amount of land he can cultivate," the family "inhabiting a house which affords them just enough space… considered necessary for that number of people" and the artisan "working with their own tools or handloom" would be free to live as they saw fit. [16] Some argue that communist-anarchism is based on the same distinction between possession and property as found in Proudhon's work.
Other important anarchist communists include Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman and Errico Malatesta. Many in the anarcho-syndicalist movements (see below) saw anarchist communism as their objective. Isaac Puente's 1932 El comunismo libertario [8] was adopted by the Spanish CNT as its manifesto for a post-revolutionary society.
Some anarchists disliked merging communism with anarchism. A number of individualist anarchists maintained that abolition of private property was not consistent with liberty. For example, Benjamin Tucker, whilst professing respect for Kropotkin and publishing his work[9], described communist anarchism as "pseudo-anarchism".[17]
Anarchism and organized labor
Anarcho-syndicalism is a form of anarchism which looks to the labor movement as the catalyst for revolutionary change ("syndicalism" being derived from the French syndicalisme, meaning "trade unionism"). Anarcho-syndicalists advocate the creation of revolutionary trade unions to fight for better working conditions, to seize control of the means of production, and to overthrow the State by means of direct action and the general strike. Anarcho-syndicalists seek to abolish the wage system and private ownership of the means of production, which they believe lead to class division.
After the 1871 repression French anarchism reemerged, influencing the Bourses de Travails of autonomous workers groups and trade unions. From this movement the Confédération Générale du Travail (General Confederation of Labour, CGT) was formed in 1895 as the first major anarcho-syndicalist movement. Emile Pataud and Emile Pouget's writing for the CGT saw libertarian communism developing from a general strike. After 1914 the CGT moved away from anarcho-syndicalism, adopting a class collaborationist position during the First World War, and then allying with the Marxist Third International following the success of Bolshevism in Russia.
Spanish anarchist trade union federations were formed in the 1870s, 1880s, 1900 and 1910. The most successful was the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (National Confederation of Labour: CNT), founded in 1910. Before the 1940s the CNT was the major force in Spanish working class politics. With a membership of 1.58 million in 1934, the CNT played a major role in the Spanish Civil War. See also: Anarchism in Spain.
Latin American anarchism had a strong anarcho-syndicalist component. Major Latin American trade union federations adopted anarcho-syndicalist programs, most notably in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay.[10] There were also numerically significant anarcho-syndicalist movements in Portugal, Italy, Germany and Japan. In Berlin in 1922 the CNT joined the International Workers Association, an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the First International, with approximately 2 million members from 15 different countries in Europe and Latin America.
The largest organised anarchist movement today is in Spain, in the form of the Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) and the CNT. The CGT claims a paid-up membership of 60,000, and received over a million votes in Spanish syndical elections. Other active syndicalist movements include the US Workers Solidarity Alliance, and the UK Solidarity Federation. The revolutionary industrial unionist Industrial Workers of the World also exists, claiming 2,000 paid members.
Contemporary critics of anarcho-syndicalism and revolutionary industrial unionism claim that they are workerist and fail to deal with economic life outside work. Post-leftist critics such as Bob Black claim anarcho-syndicalism advocates oppressive social structures, such as work, workplace, and compulsory membership in labor unions, which violates the concept of individual autonomy by denying the right to work.
The Russian Revolution
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a seismic event in the development of anarchism as a movement and as a philosophy.
Anarchists participated alongside the Bolsheviks in both February and October revolutions, many anarchists initially supporting the Bolshevik coup. However the Bolsheviks soon turned against the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict which culminated in the 1921 Kronstadt rebellion. Anarchists in central Russia were imprisoned or driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks. In Ukraine anarchists fought in the civil war against both Whites and Bolsheviks within the Makhnovshchina peasant army led by Nestor Makhno.
Expelled American anarchists Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman before leaving Russia were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising. Both wrote classic accounts of their experiences in Russia, aiming to expose the reality of Bolshevik control. For them, Bakunin's predictions about the consequences of Marxist rule had proved all too true.
The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the US for example, the major syndicalist movements of the CGT and IWW began to realign themselves away from anarchism and towards the Communist International.
In Paris, the Dielo Truda group of Russian anarchist exiles which included Nestor Makhno concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organisation in response to the structures of Bolshevism. Their 1926 manifesto, known as the Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists [18] , was supported by some communist anarchists, though opposed by many others.
The Platform continues to inspire some contemporary anarchist groups who believe in an anarchist movement organised around its principles of 'theoretical unity', 'tactical unity', 'collective responsibility' and 'federalism'. Platformist groups today include the Workers Solidarity Movement in Ireland and the North Eastern Federation of Anarchist Communists of North America
The fight against fascism
In the 1920s and 1930s the familiar dynamics of anarchism's conflict with the state were transformed by the rise of fascism in Europe. In many cases, European anarchists faced difficult choices - should they join in popular fronts with reformist democrats and Soviet-led Communists against a common fascist enemy.
Italy saw the first struggles between anarchists and fascists. Anarchists played a key role in the anti-fascist organisation Arditi del Popolo. This group was strongest in areas with anarchist traditions and marked up numerous successful victories, including the total humiliation of thousands of Blackshirts in the anarchist stronghold of Parma in August 1922. Unfortunately, anarchist calls for a united front against fascism were ignored by the socialists and communists until it was too late. [19] In France, where the fascists came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a 'united front' policy. [11] In Spain, the CNT initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the ruling class responded with an attempted coup, and the Spanish Civil War (1936-39) was underway.
In response to the army rebellion, an anarchist-inspired movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of the major city of Barcelona and of large areas of rural Spain where they collectivized the land. But even before the eventual fascist victory in 1939, the anarchists were losing ground in a bitter struggle with the Stalinists. The CNT leadership often appeared confused and divided, with some members controversially entering the government. Stalinist-led troops suppressed the collectives, and persecuted both dissident Marxists and anarchists.
Anarchism and the individual
Max Stirner's egoism
Around the same time as Proudhon's most famous work was published, Max Stirner argued in The Ego and Its Own, that most commonly accepted social institutions - including the notion of State, property as a right, natural rights in general, and the very notion of society - were mere illusions or ghosts in the mind, saying of society that "the individuals are its reality." He advocated egoism and a form of amoralism, in which individuals would unite in 'associations of egoists' only when it was in their self interest to do so. For him, property simply comes about through might: "Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property." And, "What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing."
Stirner never called himself an anarchist - he accepted only the label 'egoist'. Nevertheless, he is considered by most to be an anarchist because of his rejection of the state, law and government, and his ideas influenced many anarchists, although interpretations of his thought are diverse. Anarchists including Benjamin Tucker, Federica Montseny and the Bonnot Gang claimed him as an influence, and Emma Goldman gave lectures on his thought.[20]
American individualist anarchism
The context of American anarchism can be traced back to the American Revolution and the Whiskey Rebellion, Shays' Rebellion, and similar local revolts following American independence. Social contract theory had been used to justify the secession of the American colonies from Britain, and by extension settlers on the Western frontier claimed the right of counties and towns to secede from American states, and for pioneers to live in what were small, village-based communities. Although the Whiskey Rebellion was put down by George Washington, West Virginia ultimately did secede from Virginia during the American Civil War, following Virginia's secession into the Confederate States of America. The movement's economic projects also had colonial roots. The mutual bank was a reinvention of the private land banks and public loan offices of the colonies, a tradition extending back to 1681 and the establishment of "The Fund at Boston."
In 1825 Josiah Warren had participated in a communitarian experiment headed by Robert Owen called New Harmony, which failed in a few years amidst much internal conflict. Warren blamed the community's failure on a lack of individual sovereignty and a lack of private property.[21] Warren proceeded to organise experimental anarchist communities which respected what he called "the sovereignty of the individual" at Utopia and Modern Times. In 1833 Warren wrote and published The Peaceful Revolutionist, which some have noted to be the first anarchist periodical ever published. Benjamin Tucker says that Warren "was the first man to expound and formulate the doctrine now known as Anarchism." (Liberty XIV (December, 1900):1)
Benjamin Tucker became interested in anarchism through meeting Josiah Warren and William B. Greene. He edited and published Liberty from August 1881 to April 1908; it is widely considered to be the finest individualist-anarchist periodical ever issued in the English language. Tucker's conception of individualist anarchism incorporated the ideas of a variety of theorists: Greene's ideas on mutual banking; Warren's ideas on cost as the limit of price (a heterodox variety of labour theory of value); Proudhon's market anarchism; Max Stirner's egoism; and, Herbert Spencer's "law of equal freedom". Tucker strongly supported the individual's right to own the product of his or her labour as "private property", and believed in a [17]market economy for trading this property. However, like most anarchists, he rejected intellectual property rights as well as opposing private property in land and other natural resources in favour of "occupancy and use" He argued that in a truly free market system without the state, the abundance of competition would eliminate profits, interest and rent and ensure that all workers received the full value of their labor. Many individualists (such as Tucker and Yarros) supported market-provided private defense of labour produced property and land occupied by those who used it.
Other nineteenth century individualists included Lysander Spooner, Stephen Pearl Andrews, and Victor Yarros.
According to political historian Carl Levy, "Since World War II this tradition has been reborn and modified in the United States as anarcho-capitalism or libertarianism."[22]
Issues in anarchism
Ideas about how an anarchist society might work vary considerably, especially with respect to economics. There are also disagreements about how such a society might be brought about, with some anarchists being committed to a strategy of nonviolence, while others advocate armed struggle.
Capitalism
Throughout most of its history, anarchism has been defined by its proponents in opposition to capitalism - which, as they understand the term, can be maintained only by state violence. Anarchist organisations, for example the CNT (Spain) and the Anarchist Federation (UK), all take an explicitly anti-capitalist stance. In the 20th century a new school of thought sprung up which attempted to formulate a theory of anarchism embracing a stateless form of capitalism. This anarcho-capitalist school has met resistance from those who hold that capitalism is inherently oppressive; many anarchists and scholars don't consider it to be "true" anarchism.[23] However, other anarchists and scholars regard anarchism as opposition to the state, and thus do consider anarcho-capitalism to be a form of anarchism.[24]
Anarcho-capitalism
- Main article: Anarcho-capitalism; Semantic debate: Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
Anarcho-capitalism is a predominantly United States-based theoretical tradition that promotes an economic system of free market capitalism. In such a society no authority would prohibit anyone from providing, via the free market, any service - even those services traditionally provided by state monopoly such as police, courts, and defense against invasion. Anarcho-capitalism does not oppose profit, rent, interest, or employment.
Murray Rothbard's synthesis of classical liberalism and Austrian economics, along with the anarchist critiques of the state, was germinal for the development of contemporary anarcho-capitalist theory. Rothbard believes that property can only legitimately originate by the application of labor to unowned resources rather than by mere claim or seizure, and that it may then only be transferred by voluntary trade or gift.[25] While Rothbard bases anarcho-capitalism on natural rights, others such as David D. Friedman, author of The Machinery of Freedom, prefer to justify it on a utilitarian basis. Some minarchists, such as Ayn Rand and Robert Nozick, have also influenced anarcho-capitalism.
Anarcho-capitalism is typically founded on the Non-aggression principle (or NAP), which states that the initiation of violence is not permissible. Some anarcho-capitalists, such as Rothbard, accept the nonaggression principle on a natural law basis. Others take a consequentialist value-free approach per Friedman; yet others such as Jan Narveson take a contractarian approach asserting that rights can only come about by contract between self-interested parties who agree to refrain from initiating coercion against each other.
Most anarcho-capitalists believe that anarchism without stateless capitalism cannot exist, because in the absence of a state authority that would prevent it, stateless capitalism would naturally and inevitably develop in any free society. Hence, Rothbard's statement that "capitalism is the fullest expression of anarchism, and anarchism is the fullest expression of capitalism."[26]
For information about anarcho-capitalists favoring counter-economic strategies, see Agorism.
Globalization
Many anarchists are actively involved in the anti-globalization movement, seeing corporate globalization as a neocolonialist attempt to use economic coercion on a global scale, carried out through state institutions such as the World Bank, World Trade Organization, Group of Eight, and the World Economic Forum. Globalization is an ambiguous term that has different meanings to different anarchist factions. Many anarchists use the term to mean neocolonialism and/or cultural imperialism (which they may see as related). Others, particularly anarcho-capitalists, use "globalization" to mean the worldwide expansion of the division of labor and trade, which they see as beneficial so long as governments do not intervene.
Violence
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts, including riots, assassinations, insurrections, and terrorism by some anarchists. Some revolutionaries of the late 19th century encouraged acts of political violence, such as bombings and the assassinations of heads of state to further anarchism. Such actions have sometimes been called 'propaganda of the deed'. However, the term originally referred to exemplary forms of direct action meant to inspire the masses to revolution. Propaganda of the deed may be violent or nonviolent.
There is no consensus on the legitimacy or utility of violence in general. Mikhail Bakunin and Errico Malatesta, for example, wrote of violence as a necessary and sometimes desirable force in revolutionary settings. But at the same time, they denounced acts of individual terrorism. (Bakunin, "The Program of the International Brotherhood" (1869)[12] and Malatesta, "Violence as a Social Factor" (1895)).
Some anarchists consider Pacifism, (opposition to war), to be inherent in their philosophy. Anarcho-pacifists take it further and follow Leo Tolstoy's belief in non-violence. Although many anarchist projects have been based around the tactic of non-violence, (Earth First!, Food Not Bombs), many anarchists reject pacifism, and support a diversity of tactics, in their organizing efforts. Many anarchists do not see the destruction of property to be violent. Anarchists see war as an activity in which the state seeks to gain and consolidate power, both domestically and in foreign lands, and subscribe to Randolph Bourne's view that "war is the health of the state"[27]. A lot of anarchist activity has been anti-war based, largely in protests, demonstrations, and counter-recruiting.
Feminism
Early French feminists such as Jenny d'Héricourt and Juliette Adam criticised the misogyny in the anarchism of Proudhon during the 1850s.
Anarcha-feminism is a kind of radical feminism that espouses the belief that patriarchy is a fundamental problem in society. However, it was not explicitly formulated as anarcha-feminism until early 1970s[28], during the second-wave feminist movement. Anarcha-feminism, views patriarchy as the first manifestation of hierarchy in human history; thus, the first form of oppression occurred in the dominance of male over female. Anarcha-feminists then conclude that if feminists are against patriarchy, they must also be against all forms of hierarchy, and therefore must reject the authoritarian nature of the state and statist capitalism. [citation needed]
Early first-wave feminist Mary Wollstonecraft held proto-anarchist views, and William Godwin is often considered a feminist anarchist precursor. While most anarchists of the period did not take these ideas seriously, others, such as Florence Finch Kelly and Moses Harman held gender equality as a topic of significant importance.[29] Anarcha-feminism garnered further attention through the work of early 20th-century authors and theorists including Emma Goldman and Voltairine de Cleyre. In the Spanish Civil War, an anarcha-feminist group, "Free Women", organized to defend both anarchist and feminist ideas.
In the modern day anarchist movement, many anarchists, male or female, consider themselves feminists, and anarcha-feminist ideas are growing. The publishing of Quiet Rumors, an anarcha-feminist reader, has helped to spread various kinds of anti-authoritarian and anarchist feminist ideas to the broader movement.
Anarcho-primitivists see the creation of gender roles and patriarchy as a creation of the start of civilization, and therefore consider primitivism to also be an anarchist school of thought that addresses feminist concerns. Eco-feminism, although not exclusively anarchist, is often considered a feminist variant of green anarchist feminist thought.
Anti-racism
Since the late 1970s anarchists have been involved in fighting the rise of neo-fascist groups. In Germany and the United Kingdom some anarchists worked within militant anti-fascist groups alongside members of the Marxist left. They advocated directly combating fascists with physical force rather than relying on the state. Since the late 1990s, a similar tendency has developed within US anarchism. See also: Anti-Racist Action (US), Anti-Fascist Action (UK/Europe), Antifa
Black anarchism opposes the existence of a state, statist capitalism, and subjugation and domination of people of color, and favors a non-hierarchical organization of society. Theorists include Ashanti Alston, Lorenzo Komboa Ervin, and Sam Mbah. Some of these theorists have had past experiences with the Black Panther Party, and came to anarchism after they became critical of the Black Panther Party's brand of Marxist-Leninism. Anarchist People of Color, (or APOC), was created as a forum for non-Caucasian anarchists to express their thoughts about racial issues within the anarchist movement, particularly within the United States. Anti-Racist Action is not an anarchist group, but many anarchists are involved. It focuses on publicly confronting racist agitators, such as the KKK, neo-Nazi groups, etc.
The environment
Since the late 1970s anarchists in Anglosphere and European countries have been agitating for the natural environment. Eco-anarchists or green anarchists believe in deep ecology. This is a worldview that embraces biodiversity and sustainability. Eco-anarchists often use direct action against what they see as earth-destroying institutions. Of particular importance is the Earth First! movement, that takes action such as tree sitting. Another important component is ecofeminism, which sees the domination of nature as a metaphor for the domination of women. Murray Bookchin's work on social ecology, David Watson's work with Fifth Estate magazine, Steve Booth's work in the UK publication Green Anarchist, and Graham Purchase's writings on green syndicalism have all contributed to the broad variety and scope of green anarchist/eco-anarchist thought and action. Green anarchism also involves a critique of industrial capitalism, and, for some green anarchists, civilization itself.
Primitivism is a predominantly Western philosophy that advocates a return to a pre-industrial and usually pre-agricultural society. It develops a critique of industrial civilization. In this critique technology and development have alienated people from the natural world. This philosophy develops themes present in the political action of the Luddites and the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Primitivism developed in the context of the Reclaim the Streets, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front movements. John Zerzan wrote that civilization — not just the state — would need to fall for anarchy to be achieved.[citation needed] Anarcho-primitivists point to the anti-authoritarian nature of many 'primitive' or hunter-gatherer societies throughout the world's history, as examples of anarchist societies.
Religion
Most anarchist culture tends to be secular if not outright anti-religious. However, the combination of religious social conscience, historical religiosity amongst oppressed social classes, and the compatibility of some interpretations of religious traditions with anarchism has resulted in religious anarchism.
Christian anarchists believe that there is no higher authority than God, and oppose earthly authority such as government and established churches. They believe that Jesus' teachings and the practice of the early church were clearly anarchistic, but were corrupted when "Christianity" was declared the official religion of Rome. Christian anarchists, who follow Jesus' directive to "turn the other cheek", are strict pacifists. The most famous advocate of Christian anarchism was Leo Tolstoy, author of The Kingdom of God is Within You, who called for a society based on compassion, nonviolent principles and freedom. Christian anarchists tend to form experimental communities (such as the Catholic Worker). They also occasionally resist taxation.
Chinese anarchism was most influential in the 1920s. Strands of Chinese anarchism included Taixu's Buddhist anarchism which was influenced by Tolstoy and the well-field system. Buddhist anarchism was later revived in the 1960s by writers such as Gary Snyder.
Neopaganism, with its focus on the environment and equality, along with its often decentralized nature, has led to a number of neopagan anarchists. One of the most prominent is Starhawk, who writes extensively about both spirituality and activism.
Other issues
- Technology - Recent technological developments have made the anarchist cause both easier to advance and more conceivable to people. Many people use the Internet to form on-line communities. Intellectual property is undermined and a gift-culture supported by sharing music files, collaborative software development, and free software (also called open-source software). These cyber-communities include the GNU, Linux, Indymedia, and Wiki. Public key cryptography has made anonymous digital currencies such as e-gold and Local Exchange Trading Systems an alternative to statist fiat money.[30] Some anarchists see information technology as the best weapon to defeat authoritarianism. Some even think the information age makes eventual anarchy inevitable.[31] See also: Crypto-anarchism and Cypherpunk.
- Parliamentarianism - In general terms, anarchism opposes voting in elections. This is for three reasons. First, it is ineffective, at best resulting in minor reforms. Second, taking part in elections has always resulted in radicals becoming part of the system they oppose rather than ending it.[32]. Third, because voting amounts to condoning the state.[33] The anarchist collective CrimethInc. around the 2004 Presidential election in the US, endorsed a campaign called, "Don't Just Vote, Get Active", which promoted the importance of direct action, as opposed to electoral change, regarding social change in society. In 2006, an anarchist activist was elected to local government in Lake Worth, Florida.[34]
- Sectarianism - Most anarchist schools of thought are, to some degree, sectarian. There is often a difference of opinion within each school about how to react to, or interact with, other schools. Some, such as panarchists, believe that it is possible for a variety of modes of social life to coexist and compete. Some anarchists view opposing schools as a social impossibility and resist interaction; others see opportunities for coalition-building, or at least temporary alliances for specific purposes. See anarchism without adjectives. Many anarchists however, draw from a wide range of political perspectives, as there has been a growth in recent decades on the anti-authoritarian left of groups that are against the state, statist capitalism, and hierarchal organization, and are often highly critical of anarchism. This could include the Zapatistas, the Situationists, "Ultra leftists", the autonomen, Autonomist Marxism, various indigenous cultures, and many more.
Other branches and offshoots
Anarchism generates many eclectic and syncretic philosophies and movements. Since the Western social ferment in the 1960s and 1970s a number of new movements and schools have appeared. Most of these stances are limited to even smaller numbers than the schools and movements listed above.
- Post-left anarchy - Post-left anarchy seeks to distance itself from the traditional "left" - communists, socialists, social democrats, etc. - and to escape the confines of ideology in general. Post-leftists argue that anarchism has been weakened by its long attachment to contrary "leftist" movements and single issue causes (anti-war, anti-nuclear, etc.). It calls for a synthesis of anarchist thought and a specifically anti-authoritarian revolutionary movement outside of the leftist milieu. Important groups and individuals associated with Post-left anarchy include: CrimethInc, the magazine Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed and its editor Jason McQuinn, Bob Black, Hakim Bey and others. For more information, see Infoshop.org's Anarchy After Leftism[35] section, and the Post-left section on anarchism.ws. See also: Post-left anarchy
- Post-Anarchism - The term postanarchism was originated by Saul Newman, first receiving popular attention in his book From Bakunin to Lacan to refer to a theoretical move towards a synthesis of classical anarchist theory and poststructuralist thought. Subsequent to Newman's use of the term, however, it has taken on a life of its own and a wide range of ideas including autonomism, post-left anarchy, situationism, post-colonialism and Zapatismo. By its very nature post-anarchism rejects the idea that it should be a coherent set of doctrines and beliefs. As such it is difficult, if not impossible, to state with any degree of certainty who should or should not be grouped under the rubric. Nonetheless key thinkers associated with post-anarchism include Saul Newman, Todd May, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. External reference: Postanarchism Clearinghouse[36] See also Post-anarchism
- Insurrectionary anarchism - Insurrectionary anarchism is a form of revolutionary anarchism critical of formal anarchist labor unions and federations. Insurrectionary anarchists advocate informal organization, including small affinity groups, carrying out acts of resistance in various struggles, and mass organizations called base structures, which can include exploited individuals who are not anarchists. Proponents include Wolfi Landstreicher and Alfredo M. Bonanno, author of works including "Armed Joy" and "The Anarchist Tension". This tendency is represented in the US in magazines such as Willful Disobedience and Killing King Abacus. See also: Insurrectionary anarchism
- Small 'a' anarchism - Small 'a' anarchism is a term used in two different, but not unconnected contexts. Dave Neal posited the term in opposition to big 'A' Anarchism in the article Anarchism: Ideology or Methodology?. While big 'A' Anarchism referred to ideological Anarchists, small 'a' anarchism was applied to their methodological counterparts; those who viewed anarchism as "a way of acting, or a historical tendency against illegitimate authority." As an anti-ideological position, small 'a' anarchism shares some similarities with post-left anarchy. David Graeber and Andrej Grubacic offer an alternative use of the term, applying it to groups and movements organising according to or acting in a manner consistent with anarchist principles of decentralisation, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and crucially, "the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state power and then begin imposing one's vision at the point of a gun."[13]
Criticisms of anarchism
The theory and practice of anarchism has been controversial since it came to prominence in the 19th century. Some of the criticisms made of anarchism come from the interests it opposes, such as governments. Other criticisms have been made internally of other anarchists or by political movements that appear to share similar goals, such as Marxism.
Cultural phenomena
The kind of anarchism that is most easily encountered in popular culture is represented by celebrities who publicly identify themselves as anarchists. Although some anarchists reject any focus on such famous living individuals as inherently élitist, the following figures are examples of prominent publicly self-avowed anarchists:
- the MIT professor of Linguistics Noam Chomsky
- the social historian Howard Zinn
- author Edward Abbey
- author Robert Anton Wilson
- graphic novelist Alan Moore
- UFC fighter and champion Jeff Monson
- feminist, author and critic Germaine Greer
- Hans Alfredson, actor, film director, writer and comedian.
In Denmark, the Freetown Christiania was created in downtown Copenhagen. The housing and employment crisis in most of Western Europe led to the formation of communes and squatter movements like the one still thriving in Barcelona, in Catalonia. Although not always explicitly anarchist, militant resistance to neo-Nazi groups in places like Germany, and the uprisings of autonomous Marxism, situationist, and Autonomist groups in France and Italy also helped to give popularity to anti-authoritarian, non-capitalist ideas.
In various musical styles, anarchism rose in popularity. Most famous for the linking of anarchist ideas and music has been punk rock, although in the modern age, hip hop, and folk music are also becoming important mediums for the spreading of the anarchist message. In the UK this was associated with the punk movement; the band Crass is celebrated for its anarchist and pacifist ideas. For further details, see anarcho-punk and list of anarchist musicians.
See also
There are many concepts relevant to the topic of anarchism, this is a brief summary. There is also a more extensive list of anarchist concepts.
- individualist anarchism, anarcho-communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-capitalism, mutualism, Christian anarchism, anarcha-feminism, green anarchism, nihilist anarchism, black anarchism, post-anarchism, post-left anarchism
- Libertarian Socialism
- Anarchist symbolism
- List of anarchists
- List of anarchist organizations
- Major conflicts within anarchist thought
- Criticisms of anarchism
- Past and present anarchist communities
Historical events
- Paris Commune (1871)
- Haymarket Riot (1886)
- Ukrainian Revolution (1918-1922) (see also The Free Territory)
- Kronstadt rebellion (1921)
- Amakasu Incident (1923)
- Spanish Revolution (1936) (see also Anarchism in Spain)
- May 1968, France (1968)
- WTO Meeting in Seattle (1999)
- Argentine riots (2001)
Anarchism by region/culture
- African Anarchism
- American individualist anarchism
- Anarchism in France
- Anarchism in Mexico
- Anarchism in Spain
- Anarchism in the English tradition
- Chinese anarchism
- Islam and anarchism
- Jewish anarchism
- Russian anarchism
Books
- Mikhail Bakunin, God and the State [14]
- Emma Goldman, Anarchism & Other Essays [15]
- Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid [16]
- Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, What is Property? [17]
- Rudolf Rocker, Anarcho-Syndicalism [18]
- Murray Rothbard, Man, Economy, and State [19]
- Max Stirner, The Ego And Its Own [20]
- Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You [21]
- John Zerzan, Future Primitive
Notes and References
- ^ Deflem, Mathieu (2005). "History of International Police Cooperation". The Encyclopedia of Criminology. Routledge. Retrieved 2006-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: line feed character in|work=
at position 18 (help) - ^ Dictionary of the History of Ideas - ANARCHISM
- ^ "It was Godwin, in his Enquiry concerning Political Justice (2 vols., 1793), who was the first to formulate the political and economical conceptions of anarchism, even though he did not give that name to the ideas developed in his remarkable work." - Peter Kropotkin, "Anarchism", from The Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1910. Yet Godwin himself, in An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, credits Burke: "Most of the above arguments may be found much more at large in Burke's Vindication of Natural Society; a treatise, in which the evils of the existing political institutions are displayed with incomparable force of reasoning and lustre of eloquence, while the intention of the author was to shew that these evils were to be considered as trivial."
- ^ Daniel Guerin, Anarchism: From Theory to Practice (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970).
- ^ Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. "Chapter 3. Labour as the efficient cause of the domain of property" from "What is Property?", 1840
- ^ Edwards, Stewart. Introduction to Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc. 1969, p. 33
- ^ quoted by Max Nettlau, A Short History of Anarchism, pp. 43-44
- ^ Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. The General Idea of the Revolution, p. 281
- ^ Kropotkin, Peter. Chapter 13 The Collectivist Wages System from The Conquest of Bread, G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, 1906.
- ^ Bakunin, Mikhail (1991) [1873]. Statism and Anarchy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521369738.
- ^ De l'être-humain mâle et femelle - Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque (in French)
- ^ Kropotkin, Peter. Words of a Rebel, p99.
- ^ Kropotkin, Peter. The Conquest of Bread, p145.
- ^ Kropotkin, Peter. Chapter 13 The Collectivist Wages System from The Conquest of Bread, G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York and London, 1906.
- ^ The Place of Anarchism in the Evolution of Socialist Thought
- ^ Act for Yourself, pp. 104-5
- ^ a b Tucker, Benjamin. "Labor and Its Pay" Individual Liberty: Selections From the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker, Vanguard Press, New York, 1926, Kraus Reprint Co., Millwood, NY, 1973.
- ^ Dielo Trouda group (1997) [1926]. Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists. Ireland: Workers' Solidarity Movement. Retrieved 2006-05-30.
- ^ A.5.5 Anarchists in the Italian Factory Occupations.
- ^ "Emma Goldman: Chronology 1901-1919". Berkeley Digital Library. Retrieved 2006-05-30.
- ^ In 1827, as New Harmony disintegrated, he returned to Cincinnati. Of all the colonists, he was the only one, at least in a leading position, who seems to have learned anything. Most of them, like Frances Wright, were doomed to repeat the same mistakes and follies and end in the same disasters. Almost all critics of New Harmony have said that what it lacked was strong leadership, discipline, and commitment — strong government. Warren came to exactly the opposite conclusion. New Harmony had suffered from the disorderly exercise of freedom and the instability of Owen’s authority. On the principle of like cures like, he was convinced that the basis of all future reform must be complete individual liberty. “Man seeks freedom as the magnet seeks the pole or water its level,” he wrote, “and society can have no peace until every member is really free.” But such a condition was not realizable under the existing organization and ideas of society. New views had to replace those of the past. For the future society new principles were needed. The first of these was “individual individuality.” The sovereignty of every individual at all times had to be held inviolable. Everyone necessarily was free to dispose of his person, his time, his property, and his reputation as he pleased — but always at his own cost. - Kenneth Rexroth, Communalism From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century[1]
- ^ Levy, Carl. "Anarchism", under the "Anarcho-individualism" heading, Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2006
- ^ Peter Marshall, Demanding the Impossible; John Clark, The Anarchist Moment; Albert Meltzer, Anarchism: Arguments for and Against; Noam Chomsky, Understanding Power, David Weick, Anarchist Justice; Brian Morris, "Anthropology and Anarchism," Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed (no. 45); Peter Sabatini, Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchy; Donald Rooum, What is Anarchism?; Bob Black, Libertarian as Conservative
- ^ 1) Perlin, Terry M. Contemporary Anarchism. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ 1979, p. 7. 2) Sylvan, Richard. Anarchism. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, editors Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Blackwell Publishing, 1995, p.231.
- ^ Rothbard, Murray N. (1962) Man, Economy & State with Power and Market Ludwig von Mises Institute ISBN 0945466307 ch2 Retrieved 19 May 2005
- ^ Exclusive Interview With Murray Rothbard The New Banner: A Fortnightly Libertarian Journal (25 February 1972)
- ^ War is the Health of the State
- ^ Anarcho-Feminism - Two Statements - Who we are: An Anarcho-Feminist Manifesto
- ^ Marsh, Margaret S. Anarchist Women, 1870-1920. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.
- ^ Some anarchist sites accepting e-gold are: http://www.strike-the-root.com/, http://www.spaz.org/~dan/individualist-anarchist/help.html "I'm trying to find stuff that is specifically individualist anarchist, not anarcho-capitalist...", and http://www.buildfreedom.com
- ^ The Sovereign Individual -- Mastering the transition to the information age
- ^ J.2 What is direct action?
- ^ "Voting Anarchists: An Oxymoron or What?" by Joe Peacott, and writings by Fred Woodworth.
- ^ Anarchist Cheerleader Elected: Lake Worth City Commissioner Cara Jennings refocuses her radicalism after surprise win
- ^ Infoshop.org - Anarchy After Leftism
- ^ Post anarchist clearing house
- [22]
- [23]
- Against Politics - Appleton - Boston Anarchists
- Yarros, Victor Liberty VII, January 2 1892.
- Noam Chomsky on Anarchism by Noam Chomsky
External links
The overwhelming diversity and number of links relating to anarchism exist, below are but a few.
- "An Anarchist FAQ" version 11.4 at Infoshop.org - "An Anarchist FAQ" written by a group of social(ist) anarchists.
- "Anarchist Theory FAQ" - a FAQ written by anarcho-capitalist economics professor Bryan Caplan.
- Anarchoblogs Blogs by Anarchists.
- Anarchy Archives extensively archives information relating to famous anarchists. This includes many of their books and other publications.
- 1,500+ anarchists listed, with short bios, links & dedicated pages at the Daily Bleed's Anarchist Encyclopedia
- Infoshop.org (wikipedia page)