Tactical frivolity: Difference between revisions
m →History of the role of humour in political protest: Added 2 dois to journal cites using AWB (10081) |
Name correction |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The study of humour by social historians did not become popular until the early 1980s and the literature on this subject studying periods before the 20th century is relatively sparse.<ref name="HumourandProtest"> |
The study of humour by social historians did not become popular until the early 1980s and the literature on this subject studying periods before the 20th century is relatively sparse.<ref name="HumourandProtest"> |
||
{{cite book |
{{cite book |
||
|author = Dennis Bos and Marjolein |
|author = Dennis Bos and Marjolein 't Hart |
||
|title=Humour and Social Protest |
|title=Humour and Social Protest |
||
|year=2008 |
|year=2008 |
Revision as of 20:32, 15 May 2014
Tactical frivolity is a form of public protest involving humour; often including peaceful non-compliance with authorities, carnival and whimsical antics. Humour has played a role in political protests at least as far back as the Classical period in ancient Greece. Yet it is only since the 1990s that the term tactical frivolity has gained common currency for describing the use of humour in opposing perceived political injustice. Generally the term is used to denote a whimsical, non confrontational approach rather than aggressive mocking or cutting jokes.
History of the role of humour in political protest
The study of humour by social historians did not become popular until the early 1980s and the literature on this subject studying periods before the 20th century is relatively sparse.[1] An exception is the frequently cited[1] Rabelais and His World by Mikhail Bakhtin, a Russian scholar considered by some to be the most important thinker of the 20th century.[2] The work discusses the life and times of the writer and satirist François Rabelais with emphases on what the author considers to be the powerful role of humour in medieval and early times. Carnivals, Satire and the French folk custom of Charivari were discussed as mediums that allowed the lower classes to use humour to highlight unjust behaviour by the upper classes. These humorous protests were generally tolerated by the ruling authorities. Examples of the use of humour for political protest even from Classical times, such as the play Lysistrata by ancient Greek dramatist Aristophanes, have been described as "Rabeleisan protest".[3] Studies of hunter gather tribes thought to have systems of social organisation that have changed little since prehistoric times, have found that ridicule or anger is used by many tribes to oppose any individual who tries to assume authority in a way that violates the tribe's egalitarian norms. Tribes observed to show this behaviour include the !Kung, Mbuti, Naskapi and Hazda.[4] An example of a political protest making extensive use of humour in early modern times was the 17th century British movement, the Levellers.[5] There is much more extensive literature covering the use of humour by the protest movements which emerged in the 20th century.[1]
In the United States, Abbie Hoffman is a well-known user of frivolous tactics; active in the 1960s and 70s, his actions included dropping money onto the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange, running a pig as a candidate for president, and the "levitation" of the Pentagon. One of the earliest protest groups whose use of humour has been specifically described as "tactical frivolity"[6] is Orange Alternative, a movement that emerged in Poland during the early 1980s as a part of the broader Solidarity campaign.[1] They made extensive use of visual jokes and theatrical stunts to protest against oppression by the authorities,[7] a common theme was to dress up as elves (sometimes translated dwarves or gnomes). Orange Alternative have been described as the most "influential of the solidarity factions", central to enabling the overall movement to prevail; due in part to the success their comedic "happenings" enjoyed in attracting the attention of the world's media.[1] A protest movement described as partly responsible for popularising the contemporary use of "Tactical Frivolity" is Reclaim the Streets (RTS).[8] They formed in 1991 in Great Britain, inspired in part by the anti-road protests of the previous decades and in part by the Situationists. As the 1990s advanced, RTS inspired splinter groups in other countries across the world, and they were heavily involved in organising the international Carnival against Capitalism - an anti-capitalism event held in many cities simultaneously on June 18, 1999. Carnival against Capitalism, frequently known as J18, is sometimes credited as being the first of the major international anti-capitalist protests. RTS have reported that many of their organisers were inspired by independently reading the work of Bakhtin.[2]
Role in international anti-capitalist protests
Large scale International anti-capitalist protests are widely seen as dawning between 1998 and 2000 with events such as the protests at the Birmingham 1998 G8, J18, the Seattle 1999 WTO protests and the Prague 2000 IMF protests.[2][9]
The 1999 Seattle demonstrations saw extensive violent clashes with the police. For the 2000 protest in Prague, demonstrators divided themselves into three broad groupings based in part on the way they wished to engage with the authorities. There was a "Yellow march" for traditional non violent protest, a "Blue march" for those who were up for physically taking on the police, and a "Silver and Pink" group which is described as employing "tactical frivolity" [9] and also in being the most successful in terms of penetrating the security cordon around the IMF meeting.[8] Attending Prague was also a small group specifically calling itself "Tactical Frivolity", which consisted of a Samba band plus thirteen women from Yorkshire dressed as pink fairies.[10]
Ten months later, a group of protesters dressed in carnival outfits and again calling themselves the Pink and Silver bloc, or Pink Fairies, used the term "tactical frivolity" to describe their own methods when protesting at the 27th G8 summit in Genoa. These included waving "magic fairy wands" at the police and training "radical cheerleaders," as well as the deployment of a "revolutionary spaghetti catapult" designed to "splatter the leaders with pasta". The device failed to hit any leaders with spaghetti, but according to journalist Johann Hari the Pink Fairies did succeed in causing mass laughter among the crowds.[11][12][13]
In the early 21st century, tactical frivolity was often used at much smaller events than global summits, for example by the group Billionaires for Bush who would stage humorous events at US Republican conventions. According to David Graeber, this upswell in the use of humorous protest tactics can be traced in part to the Yippies of the 1960s and the Zapatista which began operations in the 1990s.[14]
At the 2005 G8 summit in Scotland, tactical frivolity was again used by protesters such as the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army[15] a group whose theatrical and carnival like performances succeeded in attracting considerable media attention and were funded by Arts Council England.[16] The large scale use of tactical frivolity at the 2001 and 2005 G8 protests failed to deliver any tangible change in policy. But the method continued to be used, for example at protests held concerning air travel at Heathrow, England, during 2007.[17] [18]
Tactical frivolity was used at the 2011 London anti-cuts protest. Some of the tactical frivolity protestors integrated fully into the main march - others trailed in the wake of black bloc anarchists, while remaining non violent themselves.[19] Adbusters, the magazine credited for starting the global Occupy movement, called for Occupiers to use tactical frivolity, though the method has only been used sporadically. Author and academic Luke Bretherton has suggested that tactical frivolity allows protestors to represent the otherwise inexpressible sacred power of imagination, which is achieved partly through the "use of huge puppets, dance and street theatre".[20]
See also
- Anarchism and violence
- Pink Chaddi Campaign
- Rhythms of resistance
- The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence
- Fathers for Justice
- Front Deutscher Äpfel
- Glitter bombing
- Wavy Gravy
References
- ^ a b c d e Dennis Bos and Marjolein 't Hart (2008). Humour and Social Protest. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–12, 141–147. ISBN 0-521-72214-4.
- ^ a b c John Carter and Dave Morland (2004). Anti-capitalist Britain. New Clarion Press. pp. 7–12, 84, 85, 90, 91. ISBN 1-873797-43-5.
- ^ Robin Sowerby. "Aristophanes - Dyskolos, Plutus, A Pleasant Comedie, Entituled, Hey for Honesty, Down with Knavery, Volpone". jrank.org. Retrieved 2009-11-25.
- ^ Eleanor Burke Leacock and Richard B. Lee (1982). Politics and history in band societies. Cambridge University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-521-28412-7.
- ^
Sammy Basu (2007). ""A Little Discourse Pro & Con": Levelling Laughter and Its Puritan Criticism". International Review of Social History. 52 (S15): 95. doi:10.1017/s0020859007003148. Retrieved 2009-13-20.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ In the 2007 book Complexity and Social Movements: Protest at the Edge of Chaos by Graeme Chesters and Ian Welsh, but speaking of the methods employed in the 1980s
- ^ Bronislaw Misztal (March 1992). "Between the State and Solidarity". The British Journal of Sociology. 43 (1): 55–78. doi:10.2307/591201.
- ^ a b Lees, Loretta (2004). The Emancipatory City?: Paradoxes and Possibilities. Sage Publications Ltd. pp. 91–106. ISBN 0-7619-7387-7.
- ^ a b Desmond Tutu and Theodore H. MacDonald (2005). Third world health: hostage to first world health. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd. pp. 12, 111. ISBN 1-85775-769-6.
- ^ Vidal, John (September 23, 2000). "Carnivalistas slink in with a pink revolution". The Guardian. London. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
- ^ Hari, Johann (July 30, 2001). "The failure that led to Carlo's death". New Statesman. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
- ^ Rae, Robert (March 6, 2005). "Avoiding the road to chaos". The Scotsman. Edinburgh. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
- ^ Hari, Johann (June 17, 2005). "Johann Hari: These G8 protests are vital for the world, so we must avoid the violence of Genoa". The Independent. London. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
- ^ David Graeber (2002-02-02). "THE NEW ANARCHISTS". New Left Review. Retrieved 2012-02-28.
- ^ Skrimshire, Stefan (2008). Politics of fear, practices of hope. Continuum International. p. 156. ISBN 1-84706-075-7.
- ^ G8 Can You Hear Us? (TV documentary). UK: BBC 4. 2005.
- ^ John Harris (2007-08-17). "Turbulent times". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2009-09-09.
- ^ Potter, Mitch (August 18, 2007). "Activists target Heathrow; Plan 'tactical frivolity' to disrupt airport, put focus on eco-damage caused by air travel". Toronto Star.
- ^ Mason, Paul (2012). "Chpt. 3". Why It's Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions. London,Verso. ISBN 978-1-84467-851-8.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Luke Bretherton (2011-10-29). "The Real Battle of St Paul Cathedral: The Occupy Movement and Millennial Politics". Huffinton Post. Retrieved 2012-02-18.
External links
- Tactical frivolity described by Rhythms of Resistance
- Pink Silver Group in Genoa report
- Tactical Frivolity + Rhythms of Resistance", video by Nuria Vila and Marcelo Expósito (2007)
- Tactical frivolity at the Internet Archive