Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defensive expenditures: Difference between revisions
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Business (FWDS) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)</small> |
||
I'm not sure how to reply best so feel free to reformat this. Defensive expenditures is a key concept in development economics and comes up in many Wikipedia articles (Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare is one example). Although not necessarily a twenty page article, there is enough to warrant a full article in time - also known as preventative expenditure, there is debate within the economics community as to to what extent this expenditure should be included in economic growth models. Some argue fully like it is in GDP while others argue it should be subtracted (ISEW). It will also become more and more relevant as climate change continues - expenditures to protect communities and countries will begin to form larger and larger portions of GDP and therefore become more and more relevant. This is a very brief overview as to why I think defensive expenditures as a topic undoubtedly warrants a Wikipedia article.[[Special:Contributions/131.251.253.107|131.251.253.107]] ([[User talk:131.251.253.107|talk]]) 09:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:18, 18 May 2014
- Defensive expenditures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little more than a dictionary definition: "refs" have been supplied but do not convince me that an article can be written on this topic. PamD 17:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure how to reply best so feel free to reformat this. Defensive expenditures is a key concept in development economics and comes up in many Wikipedia articles (Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare is one example). Although not necessarily a twenty page article, there is enough to warrant a full article in time - also known as preventative expenditure, there is debate within the economics community as to to what extent this expenditure should be included in economic growth models. Some argue fully like it is in GDP while others argue it should be subtracted (ISEW). It will also become more and more relevant as climate change continues - expenditures to protect communities and countries will begin to form larger and larger portions of GDP and therefore become more and more relevant. This is a very brief overview as to why I think defensive expenditures as a topic undoubtedly warrants a Wikipedia article.131.251.253.107 (talk) 09:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)