Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkham Knight: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:08, 21 May 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Batman: Arkham Knight. WP:SNOW close as redirect to Batman: Arkham Knight and protect since it is the second AfD for this (1st AfD); will by extension also protect The Arkham Knight. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arkham Knight

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable character of a video game not yet released. Also, the article lacks sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Batman: Arkham Knight. Right now, it looks like there's nothing but fan speculation, which is more applicable to Wikia. Sourced commentary can go to the main article. If he actually becomes notable, then the page can be recreated. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per NinjaRobotPirate; may be notable one day, or might appear in a spin-off article listing all the characters, but currently does not stand on its own. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Batman: Arkham Knight. It's worth attempting to engage the page history and/or talk page before coming to AfD. The character from an unreleased game is clearly missing any sort of significant coverage so there isn't much to discuss, and a good redirect target exists so it won't be deleted. czar ♔ 05:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I created this page as a Redirect to Batman: Arkham Knight. If the villain ever (doubt it) becomes notable enough for his own article, we can disambiguate with Arkham Knight (character). CR4ZE (t • c) 06:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is twice now in as many months that the major contributor has created an article on the subject. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Arkham Knight. CR4ZE (t • c) 06:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and create protect I was one of the editors who nominated for deletion/redirected (can't remember) this article to the main article. This character is not inherently notable outside the context of the game. Tutelary (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect there is nowhere near enough content for a proper article.--70.49.80.26 (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{pp-protected|reason=Per [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkham Knight]]|expiry=21 August 2014|small=yes}}
 <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''