Jump to content

User talk:Strot: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Strot (talk | contribs)
Strot (talk | contribs)
m Tildes
Line 29: Line 29:
That's why I am referring to the Financial Times ranking in order to corroborate my supposedly biased statement.
That's why I am referring to the Financial Times ranking in order to corroborate my supposedly biased statement.


Best, S.
Best,

[[User:Strot|Strot]] ([[User talk:Strot#top|talk]]) 12:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:25, 22 May 2014

Citing Steffen Roth

Hello, Strot. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Logo ESC Rennes.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo ESC Rennes.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

as far as I know, you describe yourself as a Juniorprofessor an die École supérieure de commerce de Rennes, so I strongly advice you to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before stating that your school is a world class business school. Note that this also applies to the German and the French Wikipedias.

XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 12:18, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

That's why I am referring to the Financial Times ranking in order to corroborate my supposedly biased statement.

Best,

Strot (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]