Jump to content

Talk:Nasopharynx: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
merged to tag
Assessment: WikiProject Anatomy: class=Redirect, importance=NA, field=NA (assisted)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Anatomy |class=start |importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Anatomy |class=Redirect |importance=NA |field=NA}}
{{merged-to|Pharynx|February 2014}}
{{merged-to|Pharynx|February 2014}}

== Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]? ==
== Should this article be merged into [[Human pharynx]]? ==
I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs ([[nasopharynx]], [[oropharynx]], and [[hypopharynx]]) in addition to one Start-class article ([[human pharynx]]), when we could have one C-class article describing the [[human pharynx]], with a section for each of the above. [[User:DiverDave|DiverDave]] ([[User talk:DiverDave|talk]]) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs ([[nasopharynx]], [[oropharynx]], and [[hypopharynx]]) in addition to one Start-class article ([[human pharynx]]), when we could have one C-class article describing the [[human pharynx]], with a section for each of the above. [[User:DiverDave|DiverDave]] ([[User talk:DiverDave|talk]]) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:35, 24 May 2014

WikiProject iconAnatomy Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect has been classified as relating to NA.

Should this article be merged into Human pharynx?

I believe it should, as it remains a stub after more than 4 years since its creation. Seems a bit excessive to me to have three stubs (nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx) in addition to one Start-class article (human pharynx), when we could have one C-class article describing the human pharynx, with a section for each of the above. DiverDave (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]