User talk:Bittergrey

Hello, Bittergrey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Old history...

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Bittergrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Blocking administrator: SarekOfVulcan (talk)

Reviewing administrator: Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Request reason:

I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. I've never been blocked before. Not even once. No priors. Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3. The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block. At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[1]. This contradicts the reason given here ("disruptive editing"[2]). BLP@ANI was irrelevant: The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP put it there himself, along with additional copies from his supporters[3]. This suggests they were just crying "BLP". The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[4]. His most recent RFA was declined("...too disruptive."). Of course, all of that is old history now. It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia. I've been blocked for two. BitterGrey (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. I've never been blocked before. Not even once. No priors. Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3. The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block. At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[5]. This contradicts the reason given here ("disruptive editing"[6]). BLP@ANI was irrelevant: The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP put it there himself, along with additional copies from his supporters[7]. This suggests they were just crying "BLP". The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[8]. His most recent RFA was declined("...too disruptive."). Of course, all of that is old history now. It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia. I've been blocked for two. BitterGrey (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. I've never been blocked before. Not even once. No priors. Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3. The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block. At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[9]. This contradicts the reason given here ("disruptive editing"[10]). BLP@ANI was irrelevant: The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP put it there himself, along with additional copies from his supporters[11]. This suggests they were just crying "BLP". The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[12]. His most recent RFA was declined("...too disruptive."). Of course, all of that is old history now. It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia. I've been blocked for two. BitterGrey (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}