Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eelco Visser: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:09, 28 May 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eelco Visser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dutch professor without any prizes or rewards, being that important that even the Dutch Wikipedia has no article about him. With 23k Google hits of doubtable notability The Banner talk 16:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep And an h-index of "only" 37... See his GS profile. --Randykitty (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 17:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clear keep by WP:Prof#1 at least. Nominator is advised to carry put WP:Before before making further AfD nominations. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]
- You are right, I should have looked better at this article. Then I would have seen that it was a BLP without sources and had prodded it... The Banner talk 23:47, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Without sources? I can find 5375 sources with one click. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Until someone added one, there were none in the article... And I don't assume that the sources are there, I want to see them. BTW, a prod for no sources was there before, but was removed. The Banner talk 00:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BEFORE. AfD is not for cleanup, and lack of sources when they exist elsewhere is a cleanup problem. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Nominators who make mistaken AfD nominations ~~often~~ sometimes have the grace to withdraw them to save trouble for other editors. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. His named professorship is (from the sources) aimed at younger faculty, so may not be enough by itself to count for WP:PROF#C5. But I think that putting it together with the citation record makes the case clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''keep'''. [[User:Joe Decker|j⚛e decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk</i></small></sup>]] 01:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 ===[[Eelco Visser]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Eelco Visser}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eelco Visser|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 20#{{anchorencode:Eelco Visser}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eelco_Visser Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 16: / Line 22: @@
 *'''Comment'''. Nominators who make mistaken AfD nominations <s>often</s> sometimes have the grace to withdraw them to save trouble for other editors. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 02:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC).
 *'''Keep'''. His named professorship is (from the sources) aimed at younger faculty, so may not be enough by itself to count for [[WP:PROF#C5]]. But I think that putting it together with the citation record makes the case clear. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 17:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>