Talk:History of Dalmatia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:26, 1 June 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Dalmatia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Template:Ds/talk header

Croatia C‑class High‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History C‑class High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Editwarring

VVVladimir, if several different editors disagree with you, there is an obvious explanation which is much more likely than the notion that you are protecting the Truth against tag-teaming. Please stop. bobrayner (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I've been following this for the past three days and I don't see any explanation or discussion (and thus no consensus) for removal of such large portions of the article. Care to explain yourself? Shokatz (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, bobrayner, would you please explain to us why do you insist on removing those parts of the article, including several whole sections? They were deleted three days ago without explanation by a newly created account, and when the text was restored by an experienced editor, you undid his edit with the summery "not an improvement". So, how was the article improved by those deletions? Vladimir (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bob, I came this -><- close to blocking you now. This is simply improper, and you and everyone else editing in the WP:ARBMAC topic area should know better. This was plain censorship by what appears to be a disposable WP:SPA - reinstating those edits without so much as a useful edit summary is a clear violation of decorum. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Talk header}}
+{{Ds/talk header|topic=b|style=long}}
 {{WikiProject Croatia|class=C|importance=High}}
 {{WikiProject History|class=C|importance=High}}