Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ithkuil (0th nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Ithkuil]] & [[John Quijada]]=== |
===[[Ithkuil]] & [[John Quijada]]=== |
||
Another conlang article. Heck, these people are making all of us conlangers look bad. - [[User:Cymydog Naakka|Cymydog Naakka]] 02:26, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) Note: Forgot to log in! |
Another conlang article. Heck, these people are making all of us conlangers look bad. - [[User:Cymydog Naakka|Cymydog Naakka]] 02:26, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) Note: Forgot to log in! |
||
:Another note -- [[John Quijada]] was added by [[User:Mikkalai]], not me. He also added a couple of extra words before my signature, making it look like I wrote them. (You shouldn't do that, Mikkalai...) I do vote for the '''deletion''' of both articles |
:Another note -- [[John Quijada]] was added by [[User:Mikkalai]], not me. He also added a couple of extra words before my signature, making it look like I wrote them. (You shouldn't do that, Mikkalai...) However I do vote for the '''deletion''' of both articles. - [[User:Cymydog Naakka|Cymydog Naakka]] 09:57, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Hmm, Not only that, but a conlang based on speedtalk . . . dearie me. Delete. [[User:Lacrimosus|Lacrimosus]] 02:46, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
*Hmm, Not only that, but a conlang based on speedtalk . . . dearie me. Delete. [[User:Lacrimosus|Lacrimosus]] 02:46, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Delete: Fluggernuff -- that's my own conlang for "I've had enough of private manias placed in public spaces as if they were of the utmost concern to scholars and students, perhaps out of a deeply seated mental illness that prevents the distinguishing of subjective and objective and perhaps only out of hostility at the indifference of the world." As you can tell, my language is very concise. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 04:14, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
*Delete: Fluggernuff -- that's my own conlang for "I've had enough of private manias placed in public spaces as if they were of the utmost concern to scholars and students, perhaps out of a deeply seated mental illness that prevents the distinguishing of subjective and objective and perhaps only out of hostility at the indifference of the world." As you can tell, my language is very concise. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 04:14, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
::Like I said, these people are making all of us conlangers look bad! No, we are not mentally ill, thank you very much, George, and most of us are quite capable of distinguishing subjective and objective. Don't start insulting an entire group of people because of the deeds of one. Conlangery is not a disease, it's an art form; and conlangs are works of art, not concoctions of an ill mind. - [[User:Cymydog Naakka|Cymydog Naakka]] 10:08, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' both. There are zillions of [[conlang]]s over the web now. BTW, I'm wondering whether John is a descendant of [[Don Quixote]] (Quijada was the true name.) ''That'' would make him much more notable. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 05:25, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' both. There are zillions of [[conlang]]s over the web now. BTW, I'm wondering whether John is a descendant of [[Don Quixote]] (Quijada was the true name.) ''That'' would make him much more notable. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 05:25, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Delete both: nonnotable. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 05:48, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
*Delete both: nonnotable. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 05:48, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 10:08, 24 September 2004
Another conlang article. Heck, these people are making all of us conlangers look bad. - Cymydog Naakka 02:26, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) Note: Forgot to log in!
- Another note -- John Quijada was added by User:Mikkalai, not me. He also added a couple of extra words before my signature, making it look like I wrote them. (You shouldn't do that, Mikkalai...) However I do vote for the deletion of both articles. - Cymydog Naakka 09:57, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm, Not only that, but a conlang based on speedtalk . . . dearie me. Delete. Lacrimosus 02:46, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Fluggernuff -- that's my own conlang for "I've had enough of private manias placed in public spaces as if they were of the utmost concern to scholars and students, perhaps out of a deeply seated mental illness that prevents the distinguishing of subjective and objective and perhaps only out of hostility at the indifference of the world." As you can tell, my language is very concise. Geogre 04:14, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Like I said, these people are making all of us conlangers look bad! No, we are not mentally ill, thank you very much, George, and most of us are quite capable of distinguishing subjective and objective. Don't start insulting an entire group of people because of the deeds of one. Conlangery is not a disease, it's an art form; and conlangs are works of art, not concoctions of an ill mind. - Cymydog Naakka 10:08, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both. There are zillions of conlangs over the web now. BTW, I'm wondering whether John is a descendant of Don Quixote (Quijada was the true name.) That would make him much more notable. Mikkalai 05:25, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both: nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:48, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both. Non notable. A language needs either a long history, or a lot of people using it, preferably both. These appear to have neither. Average Earthman 09:34, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)